954300+ entries in 0.707s
mircea_popescu: Anduck when i say mpex is
the superior design
this is what i mean.
Anduck: just hide
the ip of
the bot
Anduck: mircea_popescu: you
totally should change
the whole MPEX
to be used via IRC
pizzaman1337: mircea_popescu: is
that just
to provide liquidity or something?
gribble: You rated user smickles on Sat Aug 25 08:39:34 2012, giving him a rating of 4, and supplied
these additional notes: He's been running MPOE.ETF and releasing
THE monthly reports, a model for all Bitcoin financial reporting. Also handled k's of BTC as broker for various clients..
pizzaman1337: noob question: I've been watching some options books' and I've noticed some have buy/sell orders of 1000, with constantly changing prices. Is someone running a script with
those orders, or are
they mpex provided or something?
mircea_popescu: it's just
there as a possibility so people understand
that no matter what happens, mpex will
trade.
jurov: or you do
the manually?
jurov: and
trades by email are supported automatically?
mircea_popescu: there will be a 2nd bot coming online
this weekend, doing roughly
the same
thing, just for redundancy.
mircea_popescu: this ensures us against
trade being
taken down via ddos, unless someone manages
to ddoss frenode.
mircea_popescu: you can also issue orders
through it, via $post blabla, where blabla is
the url of a pastebin where you've uploaded your gpg encrypted clearsigned order
mircea_popescu: anyway : in case our proxies get
taken down, you can use mpexbot
to check
the json for vwap prices and market depth.
mpexbot: mircea_popescu: (help [<plugin>] [<command>]) --
This command gives a useful description of what <command> does. <plugin> is only necessary if
the command is in more
than one plugin.
deadweasel: it should resolve
to be a profitable venture
topace: what should mpex.co resolve
to ?
topace: BOOM GOES
THE DYNAMITE
smickles: i guess pizza is what we should stick
too
Namworld: not much
trading going on right now
TradeFortress: <TradeFortress> mircea_popescu, any output smaller
than 0.01 requires fee
mircea_popescu: you want
to impose a fee on
txs
that have small OUTPOUTS
TradeFortress: it could (not saying it is) be based on
the cost it
takes
to process/store
the
TX
mircea_popescu: and for
that matter, if you're
trying
to apply a penalty
to people who
tryt
to bloat
the blockchain
TradeFortress: then be a miner and choose which
TXes
to accept :)
mircea_popescu: the point is
that serious coders don't use magic numbers.
mircea_popescu: i don't care so much what people intend
to do
TradeFortress
TradeFortress: It's
to apply a penalty
to people who
try
to bloat
the blockchain
TradeFortress: so you can't send 1 satoshi. must send a million 1 satoshi inputs and
the size of
TX will make fees kill
TradeFortress: mircea_popescu, any output smaller
than 0.01 requires fee
Chaang-Noi: have some dust in wallet, send
to dice for lulz
to get rid of it, win under12000 lol
mircea_popescu: Namworld if
they get
to be old enough don't
they become free ?
Bowjob: Free 1 dollar
to everyone
Namworld: I guess
that's mostly
that. Not
that it's actually impossible
to
try
to send it without any fee.
Namworld: and people
tend
to exclude 1 satoshi
transactions
Namworld: apparently not... 1 satoshi
takes more fees
to
transact
than
the satoshi itself.
mircea_popescu: how come colored coins are spendable but satoshi aren't ? isn't
this exactly
the same
thing ?
mircea_popescu: well holly molly, if 1 satoshi is unspendable
then what are we doing here
mircea_popescu: im not sure what
their point is anyway. "unspendable" ?!
Namworld: I don't want
to read 1 billion forum posts and stupidities just
to find if Erik ever considered/commented
Namworld: The 1 satoshi "You lose"
transaction is kind of pointless.
Namworld: You can check
that without a
transaction...
that's
the point
Namworld: no... I guess so people know
the bet has been processed?
mircea_popescu: Namworld i dunno, did erik even say at any point why
they're sending it
that way ?
Namworld: If you don't win, don't reply with a 1 satoshi
transaction
Ukto: Namworld: join
the conversation for a sec pls :P
Namworld: SD offers a lookup
tool
to check your lucky numbers anyway. If you lose, you can see it from
the
tool.
Ukto: it worked fine
there
mircea_popescu: Ukto if you
think about it
the only practical effect it has is it prevents accounting becoming a mess a la asicminer.
Namworld: Seems
that part could be killed at least
Namworld: No, but is
the 1 satoshi return on loss needed?
Ukto: I was
talking
to Erik
the other day
Ukto: mircea_popescu:
they are just going overkill
Namworld: Can't Erik remove
those? I don't see much point anyway. You can check your lucky number regardless... If you don't win, don't confirm by sending 1 satoshi?
Namworld: Why is
the return amount needed on losses?
mircea_popescu: what is
this,
the dictature of
the proletariat or someshit ?! who even asked
them.
mircea_popescu: and wtf is going on in
these people's heads,
they're simultaneously arguing which exchanges should list and delist s.dice
mircea_popescu: i used
tghe ddos
to make a lot of upgrades, not everything's ready
to come up online
TradeFortress: mircea_popescu, are
they just
targeting mpex.co and not mpex.coinbr.com?
Chaang-Noi: after bfl fails
to ship and asicminer gets 50% of
the network i
think 1.5 btc might
trade
Chaang-Noi: only 40 shares left at .65 and
then im no longer under contract
to sell at
that price
Chaang-Noi: that was my fault, im fixing
that right now
Chaang-Noi: more
than 10,000 shares sold in
the last 2
to 3 weeks
error4733: haaa fail, i just
try but with instawallet
jurov: leave burned ground
to
them
jurov: finally managed
to sneak into my bitvps vps..