951500+ entries in 0.703s
topace_: yea, no need
to do
that :p
Ukto: topace: at least you didnt freeze
trading :D
ThickAsThieves: i cant see wall st investing in something
that is controlled by devs in IRC
topace_: bitcoind listtransactions bitches abotu safe mode, is
there a way
to
tell it
to just show me
the
transactions anyways?
benkay: be a shame
to see
the us consolidate under
their iron grip
benkay: i hope morgan and co drop
the ball hard
smickles: benkay: it was less
than 6 block according
to one claim by someone in -dev
dub: was
there an alert sent
to 0.8? I don't see it in .7
benkay: what was
the delay between blockchain fork and broadcast?
benkay: what's
the mtgox lag command?
smickles: some were saying
that, some were saying raise
the limit
dub: anti-dice would be work
to exclude
their
tsn not increas
the limit
smickles: dub: and i don't
think i said
they were responsible, i said
they forced
the issue
smickles: dub: i can see
that we disagree, but i don't
think
the limit should be raised until
the necessary
txfee is unreasonably high
dub: so sayign
teh anti-dice crew are responsible is wrong
mircea_popescu: not like iot says right
there, "put a little
tx fee, it helps
the network" etc
dub: yes but
they didn't know
that
dub: which everyone was used
to living with, when it suddenly
turned into mom and pop's
txns
taking days
to confirm somethign had
tobe done
dub: smickles: yeah dice
txns
smickles: hmm, i recall
there being
thousands of unconfirmed
txns for months and months
dub: pushing everyone else out of
the way
dub: smickles: it became a problem when dice increased
their fee
dub: smickles: yes we were,
there was 4000 unconfirmed
txn when
the call went out
to up
the limit
smickles: dub: we weren't hitting
the softcap
that offten
smickles: mircea_popescu: 23 minutes on
the .7 chain
dub: smickles: yes it was raised
to accomodate dice
smickles: mircea_popescu:
they do do a little on
the
testnet, it's just
that
the queue of stuff
to
test is long, and noone want's
to help out
smickles: or after it got caught in
testing
dub: because of
the dice spam
dub: uh
they had
to raise it
smickles: dub:
this would not have happened now if people were not encouraging pool ops
to raise
the soft limit on block size because of 'satoshiDice spam'
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 44.64974, Best ask: 44.87125, Bid-ask spread: 0.22151, Last
trade: 44.88000, 24 hour volume: 126419.84432523, 24 hour low: 36.65000, 24 hour high: 48.46900, 24 hour vwap: 44.49347
mod6: im not
trying
to
troll, i don't know srsly.
dub: <smickles> PeterL: it was
the anti-SD'ers who forced
this issue
smickles: it's stuff i recall from studying science
tho
mod6: if its on
the internet it must be
true
smickles: and
the wiki says
that electrons can't be distinguished even in principle
smickles: mod6: i
thought all electrons were indistinguishable as far as our best
tech can
tell
dub: no
theres a 250k limit
mod6: so
there is a 1mb limit now?
mod6: depends on
the scale. at
the plank scale everything is a different
smickles: the protons can't
tell one electron from
the other anyway
jborkl_: better not
tell
the protons
smickles: ya know, it's quite possible
that
there is only one electron in
the whole universe
Bowjob: he had fishes under
the
table
mircea_popescu: the (undocumented) limit
to client
tx size for instance, is not.
mircea_popescu: they need
to go
through
the whole code and
take out all
the bs of
the sort.
smickles: so you
think
there should be no limit?
mircea_popescu: it just
takes some firm adherence
to coding principle.
smickles: yeah, but not now. it could've undergone more
testing
smickles: PeterL: it was
the anti-SD'ers who forced
this issue
PeterL: how will
this outage affect satoshiDice share price?
smickles: they're still 9 blocks from forcing
the switch
smickles: ah, i
think i screwed up my look at it
then
PeterL: I
think in
the past hour
the 'right' chain has gone up 5 blocks,
the 'wrong' one has gone up 2
PeterL: The 'right' chain is definately catching up
to
the 'wrong' one
Bowjob: watching
this is entertaining as fuck
smickles: ya know,
there's a chance
this band-aid fix won't work,
the .8 chain looks like it might be going faster
than
the .7
smickles: if i had enough coins
to justify it, i might run one of each
Bowjob: and i hope everyone is actually mining on
the 0.72 chain
smickles: Bowjob:
they have a band=aid fix, revert
to
the old chain
mircea_popescu: i love
the various people on bitcointalk
trying
to move
the conversation
Bowjob: i
thoguht its solved already
smickles: now
the 'right' one is
trying
to catch up
smickles: they mined on
the 'wrong' one for some
time b/f peeps realized
there was a problem
smickles: yeah, gotta love all
those peeps encouraging
the pool ops
to mine blocks larger
than 250k b/c of SD
mircea_popescu: let me guess... so
the longer chain is
the wrong one. because
that's why it's longer
smickles: the orphaned chain is
the 'right' one
kakobrekla: well bitbet seems
to be on
the right one