948600+ entries in 0.653s
OgNasty: I'm not
trying
to get you interested. I just wanted
to know what kind of bureaucracy was behind not listing nasty
trades by assbot.
OgNasty: fan club distributes
the donated coins
to members based on
the number of seats
OgNasty: I mine coins and donate
them
to
the fan club
pigeons: i'm hoping
to hearing bout it
pigeons: ok im not smart enough
to know how a fan club can pay me money
pigeons: i cant
tell you your not smart enough
pigeons: yeah i saw you in
the forum a year ago, and it wasnt interesting
pigeons: you can be upset people aren't giving your fan club a fair chance because of surface misconceptions, but
that is happening
pigeons: i dont like
the name enough
to sign up for a site
that looks exactly like all
the scams out
there
OgNasty: your only reason is
that you don't like
the name...
pigeons: you wondered why no one in here is interested, and i
think i'm pretty accurate in
the reasons
OgNasty: you could look at
the donation distributions and do
the math if you don't
trust
the numbers on
the OP...
pigeons: how are we
to know
that your fan club yields over 18% a year. and yes i read your forum post
OgNasty: When an asset
that yields over 18% doesn't look interesting
to you, something is wrong. You are entitled
to your opinion
though. Not all of us have decades of asset management under our belts I guess...
pigeons: honestly, i don't
think people feel
threatened. i
think it doesn't look interesting
to anyone here
OgNasty: Not only
that, but by not pretending
to be a bank and refusing
to hold BTC, our exchange is far superior
to
the competition. Which is why I suspect people in here are
threatened by it. ;)
OgNasty: showing every donation and
the path
they all
take... more info
than any sane human would care
to sift
through, hence
the automated stats.
pigeons: well, best of luck
to you sir
OgNasty: available for members
to see.
OgNasty: the actual
transactions and all
that is on
the nastyfans.org site.
OgNasty: those are images... updated in real
time with stats from
the operation.
pigeons: ok i looked again, seriously
there is no information
there whatsover about your mining profits
pigeons: i looked at
that, just a bunch of manually entered numbers, and not hte ones im looking for
OgNasty: well, with nastyfans everything is automated with numbers coming from 3rd parties.
there is no need
to check anything...
the numbers come from where you'd check...
pigeons: i've never heard anyone
talk about your fan club, and i
thought maybe i will check some of
the numbers if
the pools are exposing
that information
pigeons: i've checked
the numbers myself, as have several in here
pigeons: i'm not in
the satoshi dice fan club, but you stated
that your fan club is
the most
transparent asset out
there, and here is one we can compare
OgNasty: Literally any numbers could be listed
there...
OgNasty: manually entered google spreadsheet does not equal
transparency.
pigeons: it seems 100% of s.dice profits go
to shareholders, and no one is disputing
that
OgNasty: Where is
the page showing
the P/E ratio of S.DICE shares, or
the yield?
pigeons: you said your asset was more
transparent
OgNasty: whatcu
talkin' bout willis?
pigeons: i'm not
talking about return on bets
OgNasty: S.DICE is profitting off
the ignorance of
the socially inept.
OgNasty: I'm not an independent auditor and I don't even care about S.DICE. I do my gambling at a casino, it's a social
thing.
OgNasty: go make 100 bets on
the 97% address and see what your return is for yourself.
pigeons: how did
they cheat
that? someone bet
to a secret address?
pigeons: please show me something indicating
the return from s.dice profits is any less
OgNasty: you are confused for sure. whether or not you are just
trolling me is what I'm
trying
to decypher.
pigeons: maybe i'm confused,
that's waht
the nasty fan club is
pigeons: we are
talking about assets not gambling sites
OgNasty: go make a few bets
then... haha
pigeons: they promise 100% of returns and you get
them
OgNasty: reading OPs is hard for
trolls.
OgNasty: whereas everything listed on my
thread is factual.
OgNasty: Every independent
test I've seen done on s.dice shows
that
the amount of return
they promise is a great deal from real returns.
pigeons: more
transparent
than s.dice? where everyone sees all
the money going in and out?
OgNasty: I'd say more stats and
transparency
than ANY OTHER asset.
pigeons: i looked
through several of
the 48 pages and still don't see
OgNasty: it's all public on
the site and
the
thread.
pigeons: i looked at
the forum links you posted, couldnt find anything bout
the 18% (per annum?) or any details. i do not doubt
these returns, just interested in
taking your advice and looking at it
OgNasty: even if
the fan club donates bitcoins
to you?
pigeons: and really, you are suprised no one bothers
to look?
pigeons: "NASTYFANS:
THE UNOFFICIAL NASTY MINING FANCLUB"
OgNasty: I
think most people would describe it as a company.
pigeons: well, i know for legal reasons you won't
tell us what it is, but what would you say someone else might call it
OgNasty: "The yield on
that asset is over 18%? Wow.
Too bad I don't like
the name." - No serious investor ever
OgNasty: I
think judging something on a name is retarded.
pigeons: i'm not claiming
to be a financial guru. i'm stating a fact
that calling something nastyfans is retarded
pigeons: anyway, have you offered
to push data
to assbot (assuming nastyfans is a relevant asset)
OgNasty: pigeons: sounds like you are an excellent finacial guru. You should share
that wisdom with Warren Buffet.
pigeons: i don't even look at a
thread when i see
the word nastyfans cause i ain't a fan and im sure
there are others
FabianB: then you might have
to figure
that out first
OgNasty: for legal reasons I'd rather let people figure
that out on
their own
FabianB: what kind of (in financial
terms)
kakobrekla: OgNasty can you answer
the FabianBs question-s
OgNasty: I don't
think you're ignorant enough
to be caught up on a naming convention. So I assume you have an alterior motive.
kakobrekla: nasty seats? dunno we are asset
traders here and what not, not fans of anything in particular
OgNasty: Maybe I should donate one
to you so you can see for yourself?
OgNasty: It fits
the definition of an asset.
OgNasty: NastyFans seats are capable of being owned
to produce value and ownership can be converted into cash.
kakobrekla: i dont see what
that has
to do with nasty fans?
OgNasty: "In financial accounting, assets are economic resources. Anything
tangible or intangible
that is capable of being owned or controlled
to produce value and
that is held
to have positive economic value is considered an asset. Simply stated, assets represent value of ownership
that can be converted into cash (although cash itself is also considered an asset)."
OgNasty: so
the inclusion of
the word fan makes it not an asset in your mind?
kakobrekla: yeah,
this is -assets, not -fans kinda.
OgNasty: Still say assbot should list NastyFans
trades... Sucks
to be lumped in with
the BS gigamining has going... Just sayin'
kakobrekla: errybody silently waiting for
the weekend dump
gribble: Next difficulty estimate | 5768719.44091 based on data since last change | 5650760.38918 based on data for last
three days
assbot: !mp <signcrypted dpaste.com url> (desc: returns
the response from MPEX order)
assbot: !ticker <exchange> <ticker> (desc: returns current
ticker values, supported: MPEX, HAVELOCK, BTCTCO)
MJR_: no one ever went broke
taking profits :)
Anduck: i sold mine a little
too cheap i
think
smickles: < Bowjob> you dont have
to if you just keep
the coins << (it being
taxes) it you do
that enough
to be noticed and audited you're fucked.
they'll say you should've been
treating bitcoin as barter all along, you'll have a few k of
taxes owed and 10s of k in fines