log☇︎
940900+ entries in 0.66s
smickles: i mean, we were talking about that, then you tried to say that the market on S.DICE is evidence of SD's illegality
mjr_: have you found a place that accepts btc for aluminium foil?
mjr_: who don't understand TVM
smickles: so tiberiusiv care to say why it's illegal?
tiberiusiv: if i was voorhees id be on a plane along time ago
mjr_: look at its price over time
mjr_: sdice does the exact opposite
mjr_: because of TVM
mjr_: ex dividend means i trade HIGHEST right before dividend
tiberiusiv: mjr: all stocks do that
mjr_: for fucks sake, it typically trades its lowest right before divs, and higher right after
tiberiusiv: so now you are blaming the market mjr
smickles: and also, the market is fickel, ;you can't use that as evidence to their legality
mjr_: lol, to hold the majority of people who use btc to the level of expertise of a mature market is simply foolish
tiberiusiv: if it did the yield would be 15%
smickles: not in their legal status
smickles: i believe the uncertainty lies elsewhere
smickles: also there have been concerns about the higher usd/btc impacting their volume
tiberiusiv: especially for a proven moneymaker thats around for about 12months now
mjr_: the point is, that people who EXPECT things to look different in the future
smickles: yea, they could have a run of bad luck
mjr_: you say the market is always right
tiberiusiv: i told you from the high dividend yield
mjr_: the one fatal flaw is this
smickles: tiberiusiv: how do you prove that
tiberiusiv: mjr: if the market did not share concerns about sdice the price would be 2-3x higher.
tiberiusiv: thats all that matters discussion over
mjr_: this would be a great example of logical fallacies though if anyone saves the log
smickles: it wasn't illegal just because there was a real money market for the stock
tiberiusiv: as i said, the market shares my opinion of higher then normal risk with sdice shares.
smickles: and people would pay actual money for those shares
mjr_: i'll leave it where kakobrekla was smart enough to...you don't really know what you are talking about
Namworld: They're not unlike game currencies. They're worth nothing, just used in a game. You don't pay tax on what you earn in a virtual game.
smickles: remember that site that allowed trading 'stock' in any website?
Namworld: If no one takes it for money, they're worth nothing. No one backs it.
tiberiusiv: look at this example. your friend living 10 miles from you, sells chips which can be used at YOUR basement casino far away from him
Namworld: There's nothing in a Bitcoin and no backing. In that sense, they're valueless until sold.
mjr_: tiberiusiv: another flawed argument that causes you to jump to another shaky brance
tiberiusiv: btc can be freely exchanged for dollars, just becuase sdice isnt doing the exchanging doesnt mean anything
Namworld: They're not in the sense that people want to buy them so you can sell them. But there's no one backing Bitcoins.
mjr_: fixed exchange set by and guaranteed by the issuer
mjr_: % more today
tiberiusiv: they dont have to
mjr_: the casino BACKS the value of the chip
mjr_: see there is the non sequitur
Namworld: BTC is virtual token with no fixed value. Some people happen to want to buy it. They don't have a definite USD value however, they're just valueless tokens unbacked by any entity.
smickles: casino chips are provided in an wholly different environment than Bitcoin
tiberiusiv: theres nothing wrong with that
mjr_: actually card tables are legal
tiberiusiv: and you arent allowed to take a rake
Namworld: They're a proxy for USD for easier use at the table
Namworld: Casino chips have a fixed USD value and are sold/bought by the casino
tiberiusiv: and have someone operate a cashier service in another town
tiberiusiv: based on that premise people can run gaming tables in their basements using tokens
mjr_: tiberiusiv: that you can cash out through the casino with
tiberiusiv: casino chips are tokens too
Namworld: I don't consider anything regarding moving Bitcoins illegal and won't until I'm told to. For now it's just some virtual tokens.
mjr_: but pretty sure more than 10%
tiberiusiv: theres no other BTC firms that are paying 10%+ a year...
smickles: I really don't think what SD is doing is illegal, and I'd like to have a firm grasp of why some people do
mjr_: but yeah, nice comparison to a NYSE DOW JONES COMPANY
tiberiusiv: i dont get what that has to do with anything
mjr_: tiberiusiv: which is like saying it is less liquid than most pink sheet stocks?
tiberiusiv: sdice is one of the most liquid btc assets is it not?
mjr_: tiberiusiv: you are assuming financial reporting that is widespread, and liquidity that is many orders of magnitude higher than what we have
tiberiusiv: why? because you are more certain to recieve the income from JNJ in the future
tiberiusiv: thickasthieves: a simple example, a US blue chip like johnson and johnson will tend to have a lower dividend yield then a lesser quality firm
mjr_: think the point that they are making is that sdice is not converting the btc for cash
smickles: why isn't it illegal to play games with wow gold or others like that?
smickles: tiberiusiv: why is it illegal to play games with bitcoin?
tiberiusiv: sdice is more profitable then mpex yet is a less valuable firm for a reason
ThickAsThieves: and shifts the conv there
ThickAsThieves: tib just keeps pointing out the one thing no one is mentioniong at the moment
mjr_: by your logic...with a 0% return on investment...it must be the best deal ever
kakobrekla: tiberiusiv you have lots to learn
ThickAsThieves: obv more than one thing factors in
mjr_: dividends are not the most important...
tiberiusiv: kakobrekla: dividend yield signals many things
mjr_: lol: the "major player" herein referred to as the party of the first
smickles: tiberiusiv: you know voorhees isn't even the largest shareholder of SD, right? i think he owns significantly less than half
mjr_: similar to buying bitcoins at $3
kakobrekla: tiberiusiv the value of the company is not measured in dividends
mjr_: and who see your FUD for what it is...know that this is a bargain
mjr_: those who appreciate the fact that anyone with that much market share and that great profit margin CAN"T be that cheap
tiberiusiv: in theory sdice should be the most valuable BTC company at the moment
mjr_: so short term investors got out
mjr_: and dividends in feb where not the best
ThickAsThieves: there so many places to buy sdice, all you need to do is arb yourself down to market value
mjr_: it has plunged from 75 to like 40
tiberiusiv: jurov: yes but mpex is valued higher then sdice with lower profits...
mjr_: you have to realize that some people have not made money on SDICE
mjr_: yes...not to mention...
tiberiusiv: notice how the dividend yields of the other bitcoin based business's are nowhere near sdice?
mjr_: i think your FUD and others ignorance will keep it trading low for quite a whiloe
smickles: < tiberiusiv> what cant you comprehend? << i think they feel you are misrepresenting what is happening
ThickAsThieves: its the troll shuffle
mjr_: the point is this... tiberiusiv constantly casts doubt about things, but usually has logical flaws that are obvious...when confronted, he finds other doubts...also flawed
mjr_: or are the people who OWN the broker dealer operating it
tiberiusiv: voorhees is a US resident operating a US based cashier service that allows US residents to gamble on an illegal site
ThickAsThieves: you dont have permission to buy mpex