log☇︎
940800+ entries in 0.672s
ThickAsThieves: cant you sell those?
tiberiusiv: smickes: SD dice takes a cut from running a game of chance and promoting large payout multiples
mjr_: actually same exact standard that almost all btc gambling has been operating under
ThickAsThieves: diablo i think
smickles: sd takes a cut of people using bitcoin, it's not ok
tiberiusiv: where they promise people payout multiples
smickles: so they take a cut of people using wow gold, it's ok
mjr_: point is, to really simplify...whoever converts bears resonsibility for tax and aml
smickles: (or is that diablo?)
tiberiusiv: theres nothing wrong with that
smickles: also, blizzard makes money off of the gold directly in the real money markets
tiberiusiv: they earn a % of total bet volume
smickles: tiberiusiv: it's still up to chance if and how many coins you get in wow
smickles: how is SD not earning btc from their software?
tiberiusiv: smickles: you arent logging onto WoW to play poker or toss dice, or guess numbers.
smickles: you can sell those coins for fiat
tiberiusiv: no they are earning $ from software
ThickAsThieves: if Microsoft sells me a poker exe and accepts fiat for that purchase is that illegal too?
smickles: look at what blizzard is doing, you play a game, there is a chance you get coins
tiberiusiv: smickles: theres nothing illegal about bitcoins themselves nor exchanging them
tiberiusiv: once you start operating a gambling house for the sole purpose of profit it becomes illegal
tiberiusiv: if they are running commercial gambling ventures then yes it would be thickasthieves
smickles: tiberiusiv: why is the use of wow gold legal even tho you can convert them to fiat and the issuer doesn't do that conversion
ThickAsThieves: so if WoW has a poker game inside using WoW gold, thats illegal too?
smickles: or, sry, confusion in who you were talking at
tiberiusiv: which the major ones already did
tiberiusiv: they simply stated taht exchanges have to follow AML laws
smickles: yes they are
tiberiusiv: no they arent
ThickAsThieves: it is the party tht converts it that govs are looking at
smickles: anything is convertible to fiat
smickles: tokens in the game
tiberiusiv: i asked you what the shares represent
smickles: read the contract of all those asicminer things
smickles: read the contract
tiberiusiv: so if sdice doesnt represent sd shares what do they represent?
smickles: er tiberiusiv
smickles: all the assicminer shares out on 'the market' arn't actual shares of asicminer eithr
tiberiusiv: smickles im talking about asicminer..
tiberiusiv: smickles: when what is the asicminer?
smickles: tiberiusiv: they arn't listed
mjr_: thought they started on GLBSE
tiberiusiv: or whenever they listed
mjr_: did not realize that asic miner IPO'd recently
smickles: hah, you still think S.DICE represents the value of SD shares?
smickles: that would be a real show of strength to my mind, SD keeps going even after the US GOV't tried to shut it down
mjr_: but wait...assuming he is not in the US...you are saying the try to extradite?
tiberiusiv: i think mpex shares took a dive from missing out on 2 major IPOs
smickles: so if voorhees is jailed, and the service keeps running as if nothing happened, you think the price would drop for any significant lenght of time?
mjr_: except in cases of mark to market which is usually due to margin requirements
mjr_: you only take a "loss" when you sell
mjr_: and the price rebounds
mjr_: yep, panic can do that...then stronger hands buy
tiberiusiv: point is the value of the shares would collapse
mjr_: which is the only part of black friday that had any sting
mjr_: nor could they seize the btc
smickles: even if voorhees were jailed the whole time
mjr_: that is the point...btc can't really be stopped from flowing to SDICE
smickles: SD would likely keep running at the same BTC addresses the whole time
mjr_: i won! first big win for bitcoin...oh no one wants the company?
smickles: i bet it'd be running the whole time the case went on
tiberiusiv: during the years of the ongoing trial..
tiberiusiv: even if voorhees won the case
smickles: why is SD illegal under us law then?
mjr_: which is when BANKS couldn't transfer money to or from online gambling sights
tiberiusiv: it wouldnt take longer then 1 month for motivated US authorities to put a case against voorhees together
tiberiusiv: and most of his customers are from there
tiberiusiv: of which voorhees is a subject to since he is residing there
tiberiusiv: i dont think its illegal, im simply stating the position of the US government
smickles: if you alread said why you think SD is illegal, can you at least give me a timecode so i can grep it
tiberiusiv: when those poker sites got owned
tiberiusiv: and that lesson was taught during black thursday or friday
tiberiusiv: online gaming houses that cater to US customers, tend to stay away from the US..
Namworld: I'd have to check for Quebec
Namworld: So does other provinces. They have provincial tax/sales tax depending on provinces
tiberiusiv: why would they be they arent doing anything illegal
tiberiusiv: smickles: sure they can come to US
smickles: tiberiusiv: so the people who own the casino's in morocco can't come to america w/o fear of being arrested?
tiberiusiv: namworld: quebec have added capital gains on top of that?
Namworld: I guess it's not that bad... but not excellent
Namworld: In Canada, you're taxed on 50% of your gains. Not 100%. But you can get as much as 43% tax on that 50% if you're in the top income bracket. So as high as 21.5% on gains... hmm, interesting.
smickles: tiberiusiv: that seems quite wrong
tiberiusiv: smickles: they tend not to be
smickles: so the owners of forign casino's cant be in america?
mjr_: "Well, if activity is unusual 10 times a day then something is wrong with your unusually-mometer" re: mt. gox's response to lag...
tiberiusiv: i already told you, voorhees is running an illegal gaming operation under US laws, while being a subject of the united states.
smickles: the reason I was asking was that I don't believe you gave good justification for your position
smickles: ok, so you don't have a good reason then
smickles: do you think it's illegal?
smickles: why do you think it's illegal?
smickles: but all this is a side issue
smickles: i don't think S.DICE represents the market value of SD at all
mjr_: ie. people who are payed to review stuff like what you spout
smickles: all this outside the realm of S.DICE
mjr_: he's also obtained legal advice in this matter
smickles: at these plases he sold shars of SD
smickles: he went to china, morocco, paris
mjr_: majority are learning finance for the first time
smickles: tiberiusiv: also, evooorhees has been on a plane a long time ago
mjr_: that is the point...if you think most people, and obviously most people in this convo are excluded from this point, who trade sdice do any sort of fundamental analysis or even have traded stocks before...i'd say that is optimistic