log☇︎
930800+ entries in 0.646s
MJR_: i don't care, i've never traded there and we all know they suck...let's move on to the next topic
MJR_: well, i am not talking about gox
KRS1337: ya think?
KRS1337: if i have old account but never verified will i float to the top
bitesak: the pertinent fact is slightly in between the lines. The statement doesn't quite instill confidence.
MJR_: cool thanks...i was just going to point out the one pertinent fact
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 133.10000, Best ask: 133.15000, Bid-ask spread: 0.05000, Last trade: 133.15000, 24 hour volume: 119390.78497527, 24 hour low: 110.00000, 24 hour high: 142.00000, 24 hour vwap: 127.53063
ThickAsThieves: The N options just turn into T's at the end of the month, correct?
troc: also via fb : Last year, Mt.Gox saw an average of 9,000 to 10,000 new accounts created every month. This number doubled in January, tripled in February, and sextupled in March. In this month alone, over 57,000 new accounts were created!
troc: rumour info, its what people report when they are in the queue
ThickAsThieves: but its a lot more than usual
ThickAsThieves: i guess in the scheme of things its not a lot of people
ThickAsThieves: where do i check that info again?
mircea_popescu: nah, it was all the press.
ThickAsThieves: kinda had a feeling that the run up was caused by gox lag entirely
ThickAsThieves: i'm amazed that after all that the price held
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 133.14634, Best ask: 133.19999, Bid-ask spread: 0.05365, Last trade: 133.20000, 24 hour volume: 119965.62436588, 24 hour low: 110.00000, 24 hour high: 142.00000, 24 hour vwap: 127.58826
gribble: MtGox lag is 0.056398 seconds. During this time, light travels 0.000113020960537 AU. You could have sent a bitcoin to the other side of the Earth, along the surface (0.0001339 AU).
mircea_popescu: bitcoin has been stable for the past 24 hours gasp
mircea_popescu: it's all spelled out for them, they can just steal it uncredited like before for all i care.
mircea_popescu: maybe they know what to do with it and reinvent themselves.
mircea_popescu: but let's be optiomistic : they've been given a boon these coupla months
ThickAsThieves: they will probably flail with some ugly moves before letting go of this cash cow
mircea_popescu: i wouldn't count on them being around much longer.
mircea_popescu: but that aside, mtgox has been bleeding marketshare since late 2011
mircea_popescu: and on and on. sure. intellectual lazyness is the main driver of human behaviour.
mircea_popescu: and if they're too lazy to read on something else "it's bad"
mircea_popescu: and if they happen to be used to something "it's great"
ThickAsThieves: if they sold too early "its overpriced!"
ThickAsThieves: everyone that owns possibly too much asicminer stock, says "its underpriced!"
ThickAsThieves: people's rationale usually tends to lean toward where their profit is
sturles: As long as they continue, I will be using MtGox. Hmm. Perhaps it is actually good for their business..
mircea_popescu: more power to you.
sturles: I hope they continue. I profit massively during panics.
ThickAsThieves: and Gox to man up
ThickAsThieves: causes people to seek alternatives
sturles: It is from the mouth of MagicalTux.
mircea_popescu: except this is bull, but anyway.
mircea_popescu: when you tell me to read up there's nothing there outside of very bad mtgox pr.
sturles: The pattern that has been repeated the last weeks is: DDoS starting against companies providing fast funding to MtGox, like Dwdolla, then a massive DDoS against MtGox, then only seconds later, massive selloff. Causing panic. Prolexis spends some time to mitigate the DDoS, and by then the panic is widespread.
mircea_popescu: see, that's the problem here. when i tell you you have to read up i give you what to read up.
sturles: mircea_popescu: You should at leas try to inform yourself about the DDoS against MtGox before coming with uninformed nonsense "for the record".
mircea_popescu: 1k traded today wiped the bids ?
mircea_popescu: which, i would hope, you've read the most recent trilema article on and know how it was arrived at and why.
mircea_popescu: and for the record, "mtgox ddos" is just mtgox crashing under sell pressure.
mircea_popescu: look around there, then we can talk more.
sturles: DDoS against MtGox is a bit more sophisticated then.
mircea_popescu: but seriously, please inform yourself before starting discussions, this is unseemly.
gribble: MtGox lag is 40.399133 seconds. During this time, light travels 0.0809594102008 AU. You could have sent a bitcoin ten times between Saturn and Titan (0.0802 AU).
sturles: How nice for you. No. How many trades per second was the DDoS able to generate, btw?
mircea_popescu: did you read the articles in discussion ?
sturles: If you think you can buy a better exchange and make it work better, then please go ahead. Everyone will encourage you to do so. If you are successful, you better be prepared for 100 Gbps DDoS attacks as well, but that should be no problem because every broker has a dedicated line. Right?
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 132.00000, Best ask: 132.98098, Bid-ask spread: 0.98098, Last trade: 131.83755, 24 hour volume: 125243.62956022, 24 hour low: 110.00000, 24 hour high: 142.00000, 24 hour vwap: 127.71252
sturles: And believe me -- I have tried many times to get expensive commercial solutions to difficult problems to work, and in most cases I end up with a much faster and better working homebrew solution. Commercial software developers do it for their salary, not for efficiency, elegance or anything else.
mircea_popescu: the only way this goes any further is we start insulting each other, so let's just leave it be.
mircea_popescu: as far as i'm concerned the situation here is that you are grossly unqualified to discuss this matter and still insist to do so (because as per the texbook you also lack the metacognitive abilities that'd allow you to realise you're way off).
sturles: You are still comparing apples and oranges. SIX != MtGox. Not even close. In so many ways I don't even bother to get started.
mircea_popescu: we are here in management territory. different beast.
mircea_popescu: this on top of the entire six doesn't come close to mtgox ?
mircea_popescu: you are sitting there and seriously telling me 16x replication is a big deal ?
sturles: mircea_popescu: What does homebrew has to do with anything?
mircea_popescu: bitcoin geeks still need to give up the disease and get serious.
mircea_popescu: mtgox still needs to get a real platform and professionalise.
mircea_popescu: seriously, this was an exercise in wasting my time.
sturles: Rate changes may cause trades to happen-
sturles: Yes. The big deal is that one order book change becomes 16.
mircea_popescu: i fail to see the big deal.
mircea_popescu: so then it's a magic number, they load it once a day
sturles: They use the current ECB rate for currency conversion.
mircea_popescu: don't be silly. there's no such thing. they query some service ?
mircea_popescu: wait, the conversion is not user specified ?
sturles: Because the order has to be reflected in all order books.
mircea_popescu: why's this a big deal /
mircea_popescu: so what, i can put an order to sell a bitcoin for 2 cad or 2.5 dkk ?
sturles: A bit more: USD, AUD, CAD, CHF, CNY, DKK, EUR, GBP, HKD, JPY, NZD, PLN, RUB, SEK, SGD, THB
mircea_popescu: i would guess the long list of ~250 option lines is longer than whatever list of mtgox currencies
sturles: This is the number two reason for slowness.
sturles: MtGox trades bitcoin against a long list of different currencies. A separate order book for each currency. Order books are connected at +/-2 2.5% of current exchange value.
mircea_popescu: i think you're confused.
sturles: This is the second largest reason for their slowness.
mircea_popescu: what sort of left field nonsense is that! mtgox only trades bitcoin. mpex only trades bitcoin. that mtgox has usd and eur and aud and w/e assets
sturles: MtGox supports matching buys and asks in different currencies to each other. How many does mpex handle?
sturles: How many currencies can I trade the same asset in?
mircea_popescu: obviously that's tested reality and real reality will diverge as soon as it gets a chance, but still.
mircea_popescu: and 2k it should be able to support indefinitely.
mircea_popescu: it makes no difference. trades aren't a bottleneck. if the 2k orders result in 2k trades or 2k orderbook changes or nothing at all, it's the same.
sturles: How many trades per second can mpex handle in the same asset while the number of orders are still ticking in at 2k/s?
sturles: Yes, so far it is you thinking.
mircea_popescu: this is a case of me having some competence and a bunch of geeks thinking they know better on the strength of their experience hacking their own nat router.
mircea_popescu: listen to me. this isn't a case of "i think"
sturles: If you think you can go out buy a better bitcoin exchange, just do it.
mircea_popescu: i'm not interested in handling fiat and this is not an argument.
mircea_popescu: wtf, we're talking about pretty much the one field where that's not the case.
mircea_popescu: no, just this bizzaro superman attitude. homebrew beats commercial.
sturles: mircea_popescu: And my home network is only 6 mbit/s, so I can't follow it during the DDoS sessions. To many order changes.
sturles: mircea_popescu: You have to use the socketIO feed for that.
mircea_popescu: yeah well, i'm putting all this down to geek disease then.
sturles: mircea_popescu: I have been working in IT for more than 20 years, and homebrew beats commercial products in 9 of 10 cases,.
mircea_popescu: having some tinker-product homebrew nonsensical thing used as a trade engine is nonsense.
taub: its one of the main reasons it lags, and they can have that feature and still not make the exchange lag