921100+ entries in 0.629s
jborkl: it is breaking support and
the chart looks sickly
gribble: There are currently 0 bitcoins demanded at or over 99.0 USD, worth 0.0 USD in
total. | Data vintage: 0.0042 seconds
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 93.97329, Best ask: 94.00000, Bid-ask spread: 0.02671, Last
trade: 94.00000, 24 hour volume: 143971.50098586, 24 hour low: 84.43689, 24 hour high: 102.00000, 24 hour vwap: 94.53419
jborkl: wow -gold down
to 1300's
pgp: markets
taken a beating,
too
Bugpowder: it is going
to sell off before I can dump
the rest of my coins.
jborkl: I did it, dont get
too excited
gribble: watching for another drop
to low 90s,
then re-evaluating ask depth and
targets | updated by OneFixt at Apr 15 2013, 10:47 UTC (
tips:
http://bit.ly/YnxUM4 ) | disclaimer:
http://bit.ly/129bYJ6 |
this is not investment or
trading advice | #bitcoin-analysis | 5 hours, 45 minutes, and 30 seconds ago
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 95.22101, Best ask: 95.92000, Bid-ask spread: 0.69899, Last
trade: 95.92000, 24 hour volume: 140774.22839093, 24 hour low: 84.43689, 24 hour high: 102.00000, 24 hour vwap: 94.64984
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 95.38000, Best ask: 95.49999, Bid-ask spread: 0.11999, Last
trade: 95.38000, 24 hour volume: 140456.92501169, 24 hour low: 84.43689, 24 hour high: 102.00000, 24 hour vwap: 94.65965
BitHub: better off
throwing yourself into
the mainstream and charging 20% comissions
BitHub: but i've noticed when
there's a huge dip
they'll hit
the websites straight away because its quicker
BitHub: i
think alot of people still buy locally
MJR_: who doesn't admit
that afghanistan is getting old...
MJR_: and
there is always iran
taub: he's one of
those
types who openly says war is good for
the economy etc
taub: Krugman doesn't know shit, he still belives
the broken window fallacy
Namworld: Before, people bought locally. Now,
they buy more on
the web. It shifted customers/services around. And I
think mostly consolidated a few large companies, but
that's just an impression I have. I'd need data
to back it =/
MJR_: As
the rate of
technological change in computing slows,
the number of jobs for IT specialists will decelerate,
then actually
turn down;
ten years from now,
the phrase information economy will sound silly.
MJR_: The growth of
the Internet will slow drastically, as
the flaw in "Metcalfe's law"–which states
that
the number of potential connections in a network is proportional
to
the square of
the number of participants–becomes apparent: most people have nothing
to say
to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear
that
the Internet's impact on
the economy has been no greater
than
the fax
pgp: from
that chart, perhaps
Bugpowder: VGTSX looks undervalued relative
to SPY
pgp: so now he banks on
that credential from his left wing bully pulpit and it annoys
the crap out of me...
pgp: you know, i always
thought it strange
that as a journalist/writer, he won
the nobel for economics, which is almost exclusively awarded
to academic
types...
pgp: it will end in
tears
Bugpowder: I just can't
think of any asset class
that is undervalued right now
Bugpowder: Sold my sprint on
the pop
this morning @ 7.29
Namworld: I didn't manage
to grab back some low BTCs in
the 60s before it bounced back
Bugpowder: top
to bottom of
the last crash, scaled for
this crash says $16.12 is
the bottom.
Namworld: I'm sad I had most of my BTC value in my portfolio couldn't sell all at
the
top
Bugpowder: it was really stable at 15 for a long
time
Namworld: I could share
the spreadsheet so you have make a copy, BitHub
pgp: not a good sign... definately further
to go down...
BitHub: going
to play with
this nam,
thanks i'll send you a
tip when finished
Namworld: since price doesn't go up, I expect demand from speculators
to drop and ones still holding
to start selling as prices slowly go down
Namworld: demand is gone... but most don't want
to sell yet
Namworld: yeah,
they should have an API soon
Namworld: and also convert
the whole BTC value
to USD using MtGox weighted average
Namworld: Other
than
that, it can
track BTCT.co, Havelock, BTC address balances
Namworld: and MPEx sharecount
too, as
there's no API for accounts
Namworld: BitFunder needs manual updating
tho, no API yet
BitHub: oh yeah i was just
there
Namworld: [11:28] <BitHub> i need
to
track my portfolio
gribble: Next difficulty estimate | 8898397.1525 based on data since last change | 8824046.14459 based on data for last
three days
BitHub: i need
to
track my portfolio
MJR_: not sure,
that's what someone recommended
to me before
BitHub: i checked
the website but nothing
gribble: (ticker [--bid|--ask|--last|--high|--low|--avg|--vol] [--currency XXX]) -- Return pretty-printed mtgox
ticker. If one of
the result options is given, returns only
that numeric result (useful for nesting in calculations). If '--currency XXX' option is given, returns
ticker for
that
three-letter currency code. It is up
to you
to make sure
that
the
three letter code you enter is a valid (1 more message)
MJR_: i
thought kakobrekla had a
ticker service already?
BitHub: i need
to check your site, its been a while :)
Namworld: You can use
the formulas
to fetch data using
the APIs of various exchanges
troc: because
that only works for mpex, others could cause a flood ?
Namworld: because it would put lots of stuff in
the chat
BitHub: why cant i just
type !ticker Mpex and get a list of all
the assets
Namworld: although
the
ticket
thing ain't
that hard
to do
Namworld: I have my spreadsheet
tools, should be able
to fetch all data you need
BitHub: cant anyone just do a simple readable asset
ticker?
assbot: Ah, your hair. Your hair is soft. It's like a girl's. Now how do you get it
that way?
assbot: !mp <signcrypted dpaste.com url> (desc: returns
the response from MPEX order)
assbot: !ticker <exchange> <ticker> (desc: returns current
ticker values, supported: MPEX, HAVELOCK, BTCTCO) {short: !t}
Scrat: its pretty evident by now
that
the gox "engine" does a linear scan of all orders (lol) and
that
takes around a second
Scrat: apaprently hft is 0.1
trade per second with 400 ms gateway latency now
Scrat: taub: what made me laugh is
that in
that "we are mtgox" reddit, a lot of people were like "please block
the hft bots"
taub: we believe
that not only does high frequency
trading not contribute
to
that purpose, but
the way exchanges currently operate leaves
the doors open for major manipulation.
jcpham: some form of implementation might get a lot of
traction
unbalanced_: jcpham, anyone: Do you
think a double auction exchnage as in
the 247btc.com link above would get
traction?
MJR_: is
that just a simple moving average or a standard deviation?
MJR_: bitcoinity looks prettier
than usual
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 97.05008, Best ask: 97.59899, Bid-ask spread: 0.54891, Last
trade: 97.05007, 24 hour volume: 139241.84612092, 24 hour low: 84.43689, 24 hour high: 102.00000, 24 hour vwap: 94.77476
gribble: There are currently 129652.19 bitcoins offered at or under 9999999.0 USD, worth 167037264.711 USD in
total. | Data vintage: 117.6040 seconds
gribble: There are currently 43723736 bitcoins demanded at or over 0.0 USD, worth 14483375.3202 USD in
total. | Data vintage: 96.4113 seconds
gribble: There are currently 0 bitcoins offered at or under 0.0 USD, worth 0.0 USD in
total. | Data vintage: 91.0591 seconds
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 96.97801, Best ask: 96.99900, Bid-ask spread: 0.02099, Last
trade: 96.97801, 24 hour volume: 139162.02515050, 24 hour low: 84.43689, 24 hour high: 102.00000, 24 hour vwap: 94.77353
gribble: watching for another drop
to low 90s,
then re-evaluating ask depth and
targets | updated by OneFixt at Apr 15 2013, 10:47 UTC (
tips:
http://bit.ly/YnxUM4 ) | disclaimer:
http://bit.ly/129bYJ6 |
this is not investment or
trading advice | #bitcoin-analysis | 2 hours, 16 minutes, and 20 seconds ago
mircea_popescu: anyway, i'd love
to stay and chat but i'm due in some meetings. we continue later.
mircea_popescu: mostly
the drop
triggered what looks more like safety
than actual pricing assumptions
unbalanced_: Did
the algo actually change mid-month, or did
the spreads just widen due
to volatility, still using
the existing algo?
mircea_popescu: anyway.
the bot's pricing algo is proprietary, yes. i don't see why it wouldn't be.
unbalanced_: New
topic:
the bot's option pricing algo. Is
that a secret? Does it have
to be?
unbalanced_: b) it's growing exactly as fast as you want it
to. If you want it
to grow faster or slower, you know what
to do better
than I.