log☇︎
918600+ entries in 0.618s
orkaa: shouldn't matter where they came from
mircea_popescu: current day egyptians are turkish stock (short, stocky, black curly hair)
gribble: \*AWAY UNTIL April 28\* resistance: 132, 136, 138-140 | support: 120, 115, 110, 100, 90 | lower buy targets: 102, 96-100, 86 | updated by OneFixt at Apr 21 2013, 18:00 UTC ( tips: http://bit.ly/YnxUM4 ) | disclaimer: http://bit.ly/129bYJ6 | this is not investment or trading advice | #bitcoin-analysis | 1 day, 1 hour, 7 minutes, and 12 seconds ago
mircea_popescu: this is like egypt. classically egyptians were tall, thin nosed, fair haired people.
orkaa: Historically, the term was used for many people from these regions, without regard necessarily to skin tone.
orkaa: let me check the wiki page :)
mircea_popescu: tho the argument is kinda misplaced. caucasian !=== white.
jcpham: maybe not to everyone else
mircea_popescu: maybe that line is not always easy to draw.
jcpham: not the actual data
jcpham: the conspiracy would stem from the two of you combining your opinions
jcpham: i can see that but like i said, what do you value his data or his opinions
jcpham: what's the damage?
jcpham: well if we're talking about compensation, I wouldn't suggest paying for bad data...
jcpham: if he were providing a forecast or something i think it's a lot more questionable that paying for a data report
mircea_popescu: but he has designed the entire process.
jcpham: if you pay him for opinion it is one thing, but paying for reporting is another
jcpham: he work that dooglas does, does it involve his opinions or is he simply formulating data
jcpham: keep this in mind, if you will
mircea_popescu: jcpham indeed. article even says that.
mircea_popescu: and people doing useful shit will just get trhe added insult.
jcpham: i see the problem. but the irl solution is just as immoral
mircea_popescu: so then those with better marketing skills will get paid
jcpham: he work isn't lobbied for to your liking
jcpham: those who see value in his work should dnoate or contribute to an organization that pays him
mircea_popescu: bs model, even more immoral than the problem.
mircea_popescu: any guy who figures he can somehow elbow people into sending donations which he can then uyse as working capital for some other venture ?
jcpham: and pay him from that?
mircea_popescu: well that's why
jcpham: don't see the problem
mircea_popescu: "At any rate, I would like to humbly solicit the best and brightest minds of our generation to consider this problem"
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla im not sure things work that way. good scamzors are hard to detect anyway. bad ones are bad anyway
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla timisoara > california for sun
kakobrekla: im thinking now, publishing best practices like that would only make scamzors a bit harder to detect
kakobrekla: maybe MJR_ can tell him "no skateboards"
kakobrekla: >If you want to be a defacto regulatory, at least come up with sensible regulations.
kakobrekla: gotta calm the skin with lcd backlight.
mircea_popescu: and how the 500th iteration of a failed idea is going to yield results simply because he doesn't know of the other 499
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla i imagine he's going to show us all how stoopid we really are
mircea_popescu: ok this goes to twitter too
pgp: trust is hard won in the bitcoin arena...
mod6: i basically just end up hording btc since or sending them to use on MPEx since the trust level with just about everything else in this space is too great to bear.
mod6: i seriously do... i've had to navigate through all of these scams since the old days. i only got scammed, so far, by tor-wallet which was idiot to use anyway. Lost like 5 BTC on them.
mircea_popescu: pgp o fuck yes i confused them. bitinstant it was.
mod6: I figured it was worth a try to see how it goes. So far, I'm satisfied with the service. Will let you guys know how it ends up.
mod6: i guess i have scammer ptsd from all of this bitcoin stuff. There have been some ugly public fights about stuff in the past with them. But I've been talkin to coingenuity for a long time on irc and looking at the coinabul site a lot but never made a purchse.
mircea_popescu: and now is focusing on coinapult which is not related to coinabul.
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla afaik erik was with bitpay team but they parted amicably
mod6: So far I haven't had any issues or heard the anything like the guy on btctalk.
mod6: I placed 2 orders on the 9th, one for silver one for gold. I received my silver order by the 15th. My gold order is still in processing. Orders were < 2 BTC each. I was pretty happy with receving my silver order so I gave them a rating of 2.
kakobrekla: oh no thats coinapult
kakobrekla: isnt erik with them or mixed smth up?
kakobrekla: >and we're glad it happened to us instead of a normal user
kakobrekla: >. This is the kind of one-in-a-million occurance that happens when using cutting edge systems like Bitcoin,
jborkl_: Well, they can not fufill orders when price crashes- shorting a order $30 - you made good on 21000 BTC
jborkl_: and that was a real amount of money
jborkl_: Think how that would have gone for you MP, last month when the bot got raped
mircea_popescu: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=181662.0 this actually sounds pretty awful
IronSalad: query thickasthieves
mircea_popescu: indian giver = person who gives then tries to get it back :D
zebedee_: Not sure what that is. Just thought it was a cool way to introduce btc to people. Only gave them to people who have added value to my life in some way or other.
zebedee_: Trying to think of devious ways to swap a version 2 for a version 1 with the people I gave them away to :)
zebedee_: And I have more version twos.
zebedee_: I bought about 30-40 version ones, with the bad hologram. Gave all away apart from 3, when I saw what they were going for :)
thestringpuller: shits are hard to find
zebedee_: No. Writing my own bitcoin stuff in C though, but just for fun and to understand it better.
zebedee_: OK, thanks. I used to use offline electrum but have moved to paper wallets a-la casascius.
mircea_popescu: basically my tech ppl pick up some open software and rewrite it.
zebedee_: OK. What do you do personally if you don't mind my asking?Which client do you use, or do you do your own thing with private keys etc?
mircea_popescu: not risk per se, just, bitbet is a valuable business publicly owned, its internals may be discussed up to a certain - arbitrary - point.
zebedee_: Sure. Just was curious about the tech of the offline wallet, as I've been dealing with such issues in a personal capacity myself. If you don't want to say anything fair enough, though I don't really see what risk that might expose you to.
mircea_popescu: all i'm going to say is that bitbet server holds less than 10 btc at all times.
zebedee_: Thanks. I'm curious - how do you handle your wallet?Do you pregenerate thousands of addresses in and store them in a DB somewhere?
zebedee_: OK, that seems good.
mircea_popescu: so few people actually try to game it this way.
mircea_popescu: furthermore, trying to game it this way exposes you to the following risk : if your bet doesn't make it into a block before bet is closed
mircea_popescu: if you look you will ocasionalyl see "refund" on the bet list.
mircea_popescu: zebedee_ no, for two reasons. one is that bets coming in after the fact are refunded
mircea_popescu: (such as the avalon delivery bet was)
zebedee_: OK because people can game that if they bet just as, or immediately after, it's "happened".
mircea_popescu: there are however bets which only resolve on their stated date, regardless. this is obvious from the wording
mircea_popescu: if the stated resolution is close the bet is resolved now or then, depending on load.
mircea_popescu: there's two loose cases here. if the stated resolution is far off (ie, more than a week), and the bet is clearly satisfied then the bet is paid off now.
zebedee_: One more: what is your policy for bets which are determined before they expire? e.g. suppose it's a bet about BTC going above X USD by end 2013 and it happens tomorrow. Do you pay out tomorrow, or what?
zebedee_: mircea_popescu: No I think you're right, thanks.
mircea_popescu: Every bettor on the winning side will receive as follows : 99% of his original bet sum (1% goes to BitBet.us) plus 99% of his bet times the total bet by the losing side multiplied by the winning side total weight and divided by his bet's total weight.
zebedee_: None of this BFL vague bet shit.
mircea_popescu: i think that pretty much says it, wouldn't you say ?
mircea_popescu: zebedee_ you get that weight no matter what you bet. it's your bet * that weight.
mircea_popescu: by this comparison satoshi dice is 99% undervalued.
zebedee_: But if I bet 1 BTC I get that weight? That makes it per BTC.
mircea_popescu: so i get what you ask now. yes it's per btc in the sense gravity is per kilogram.
zebedee_: Although it may be obvious, I don't believe that's explicit anywhere.
zebedee_: mircea_popescu: Right, so my total weight if I bet 2 BTC is twice what it is if I bet 1 BTC?
mircea_popescu: zebedee_ i'm not sure how you mean ? the weight is just a factor.
zebedee_: mircea_popescu: For bitbet.us, the weight is for a 1 BTC bet I assume (i.e. proportional to size)? I might have missed something but this doesn't seem to be explained in the FAQ.
kakobrekla: do you have some "lalala piss" too?
Scrat: (provided that you're talking about the forum)
bowjob: pegging it to fiat
bowjob: and it adjusts it automatically for them