917100+ entries in 0.672s
Scrat: is
the smtp server yours?
Scrat: what do you use
to send emails
topace: i guess insert emails
to send into a database, and have another server pull
them out and send
the mail from
there
topace: but i still dont know what
to do with
the damn "received from" header
topace: so i can deal with a bruteforce scan of
the entire ip4 range on port 80, by whitelisting/firewalling
the cloudflare IP's
topace: its gone now,
try again
topace: heh, forgot
to deconfigure
that
ll: can get it from your dns servers
too
Scrat: topace: would be a good idea
then (to whitelist
these blocks)
topace: but i still need a way for
tha
tmail server not
to add a "Received from:" header
topace: and leaving it as just
the mail server im sending out from
topace: ill obviously be removing
them when i switch IP's
topace: ll: only if you put
them
there
topace: im sure
they add/remove occasionally
topace: very little from what i can
tell
Scrat: how often does
that list change
Scrat: topace: here's
the problem,
they don't have set IPs
mircea_popescu: i'll save you
the 4bn lookups : mpex.co. 474 IN A 174.127.72.233
topace: so apache wont reply
to any host
thats not cloudflare
topace: actually, simply setting Allow from IP's in apache should fix
that problem scrat
Scrat: takes a few ec2 machines
to do it in a few hours, at a minimal cost
Scrat: no anti-ddos service has set IPs,
they juggle
them around, nullroute
them ,etc
Scrat: mircea_popescu: are you implying
that it doesn't work? it can be avoided however if reverse proxies have set IPs and your webservers whitelist said IPs
ThickAsThieves: i should have clarified
to look at
the M1 chart
to see
the spike
mircea_popescu: <jborkl> BFL sends a demo unit
to Wired did wired say anything yet ?
Scrat: no idea if cloudflare does
that
mod6: haha! i'm getting so sick of
these clowns
Scrat: akamai can setup a custom X-Header so you know it's
them, you check for it and show vhost not found if it's not
them
Scrat: one of
them will present a
http 200 for
the host header havelockinvestments.com
topace: Scrat: pelase let me know my IP, im changing it soon as i get
the email
thing figured out www.havelockinvestments.com
topace: whats
the solution
to
this? dont send emails? lol.
topace: so, question - my webserver ie behind cloudflare, but it sends emails,
the receiving SMTP server adds a "received from:" header
to
the message, revealign
the IP of my server..
mod6: well, at least
these people in
the MSM certainly all seem
to be
jborkl: BFL sends a demo unit
to Wired
tk993: War starting
to rage over bitcoin price.
MJR_: but yeah, how much of
the value of
the world do you have under your control = making it rain on bitches or not
MJR_: mircea_popescu:
they are one and
the same
MJR_: anyways, lunch
time, cya later
MJR_: total money =
total value
MJR_: great article...think
the same
thing as far as its all about
the value
seongyupyoo: yeah i'd like
to see a distributed exchange also
MJR_: the entire idea is only interesting as a
theoretical philosophical exercise
ThickAsThieves: also,
the coins dist by donated
tx fees could easily be spread out
thin
MJR_: you can look up a spreadsheet
that
tells you each pool's rules...also, who cares
seongyupyoo: that sounds about right
that pool ops wouldn't share
seongyupyoo: how
to distribute among nashx
traders is another issue,,, like it was brought up before people can make fake accounts and many face
transactions
ThickAsThieves: i didnt even know most pools dont share
tx fees, is
that
true?!
MJR_: i want
to
trade! i will roll up
the bills and push
them
through ethernet?
MJR_: how do i do a p2p
transfer of $155?
MJR_: that is why its best
to distribute
to people who are using nashX
seongyupyoo: still pool ops are incentivized
to destroy
MJR_: i
think
the major problem with all
these decentralized exchange ideas is
that
they have no concept of fiat money, and do nothing
to solve
that problem
kakobrekla: most ops
take
those fees in
the pocket
kakobrekla: basically you are giving
them
to pool ops
seongyupyoo: kind of still similar
to putting it in blackhole
MJR_: ok...and whichever coins you want
to lose, you can just lose?
mircea_popescu: it will be difficulty
to argue
that miners are extra incentivised
thus
seongyupyoo: because
transactions are done by
the
traders
themselves, not by nashx
mircea_popescu: <ThickAsThieves> what if you donate
the destroyed coins as
TX fees into blockchain <<
this may work
seongyupyoo: yes,
that would still mean
they each have
to make many
transactions
MJR_: his plan was
to give it
to market participants
ThickAsThieves: what if you donate
the destroyed coins as
TX fees into blockchain
mod6: i hate
the idea of coin 'taint'
MJR_: i personally like bitcoin just
the way it is, i haven't seen another system which brings anything valuable
to
the
table in my opinino
MJR_: he just doesn't give
them
to
the people actually wanting
them
MJR_: seongyupyoo: he doesn't actually destroy
them
seongyupyoo: and how
to handle big
transactions or allow many quick small
transactions
seongyupyoo: yes
two problem i see with nashx now is destroyed coins
MJR_: trying
to make coins which are used illicitly be
tracked
MJR_: so since its voluntary, all
the best, have fun
MJR_: if you don't want
to participate in
the system, it doesn't matter
to you