log☇︎
904400+ entries in 0.645s
parseval: That price is too high..
truffles: deadweasel hate cliques though
deadweasel: truffles you're clearly ruining our sausagefest in here, at least pretend to own a johnson.
truffles: if that question is directed at me, your will is so weak ...
furuknap: I need to fix dinner...
furuknap: bah, where' s the spell checker.
furuknap: *distringuishing characteristics of the _business plan_
furuknap: Actually, I wasn't trying to make a point of it, I was just responding to a question about what I thought of the project. From the projects I have evaluated, those were distinguishing characteristics in addition to a growing confidence that such a delivery is technically feasible. Two months ago, I probably wouldn't have given it a second glance.
furuknap: Of course IF (again intentionally) this is legit AND they deliver within a reasonable time frame, the proposition is a gold mine, perhaps more so than AM even.
pigeons: and if you're even making those points, something is wrong
pigeons: i haven't even looked into whatever you're talking about. I just saw "if he was scamming he would do it for more money and why would he use his real name"
furuknap: Not saying it smells roses either, just to be clear on that.
furuknap: I understand that, and I eat so much salt these days, I'll be a mummy by the end of the summer. This doesn't smell right though (and right here would be scam).
mircea_popescu: 're new. pigeons has been here through the scams. when he says "not an effectual heuristic" he is speaking from a place of pain.
pigeons: there are pages of debate today on bitcointalk about how this site that you pay .25 btc for him to mine .3 btc for you on his nvidias cant be a scam because people have been getting paid
furuknap: Again, it seems way too much effort for essentially peanuts. I don't know. Might throw a few coins there to see if it sticks.
mircea_popescu: he has 100 btc on the line. if he puts 1000 on the other side to make back his 100 he still pays the rake
furuknap: MP: True, but the BP is also denominated in USD, not BTC, so they seem to be targeting people outside the community who may not be aware of the tradition of PGP signed stuff.
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves even if he bets the other side.
mircea_popescu: furuknap i have yet to see a pgp signed declaration from any of these people.
ThickAsThieves: and he can always bet the other side
furuknap: Deson't matter if they care for it. They could have done it without. IF (and I capitalized that intentionally) the people in tne BP are the real people and not just a Google image search, what possible reason could they have for adding their names when they don't have to?
pigeons: trendon and madoff and the rest scammed for enough to pay old investors and enough to eat
furuknap: Maybe. On the other hand, they could also easily have scammed anonymously and not have the burden of tainting their names.
furuknap: Yeah, but if you were doing that, would you rather have $5M or $500M?
pigeons: people who run ponzi schemes basically scam, trash their name and reputation, etc, for usually $0
ThickAsThieves: or maybe the bet is just mp trollin'
furuknap: Faking a couple of results from their bio work would probably yields orders of magnitude more reward. They're putting their own names on the line so they'll have to disappear anyway, so why not scam for $50million instead?
furuknap: Provided the people behind it really are the people in the business plan, they seem like smart enough people that if they wanted, they would scam someone for far more money.
ThickAsThieves: If the bet is proof, why not 500btc?
furuknap: The business plan, the picostocks setup, the putting your name on the line. At the time, there weren't asking for much. It's become a lot since then, but at the time, I mean, if you wanted to scam someone, at least you should do it big.
ThickAsThieves: the bet is an odd way to prove yoursel
mircea_popescu: furuknap where's the effort ?
furuknap: I think the entire community is skeptical due to some key providers being late and scams. AM showed it's possible. The swedes work with very reputable companies. 100TH certainly has put a lot of effort into what at the time seemed like a peanut reward.
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves well, i count the 100 btc of bitfury's as some evidence
ThickAsThieves: even the ones that ship rarely really do
ThickAsThieves: Is there any evidence from any unproven ASIC provider that shows any reason to assume it's a lie til it ships?
furuknap: On 100th? Not sure. It looks a bit too good to be true.
mircea_popescu: something like "here are names so it's legit" ? the pietila guy also throws names around
mircea_popescu: furuknap but i mean, what exactly is your judgement there ?
furuknap: Or maybe I used too much :-)
mircea_popescu: i came with opposite results from the same research.
furuknap: No, but the people behind it are published in the business plan and seems reputable on brief research.
mircea_popescu: his statements that he's invested with third parties are his own.
furuknap: That would be fraud from two well known and public people. Do you think that's likely?
mircea_popescu: whoa the bet is about even now
mircea_popescu: while bitfury seems pretty certain he;ll deliver, i still very much doubt that investment exists.
furuknap: Yeah, I read up on the origonal 75TH mine, but I also got the impression that bitfury was more legit.
mircea_popescu: so then they made another 1mn ish investment with bitfury
mircea_popescu: the story is that they had a 1mn ish investmenty with tom van ripyou of basic
ThickAsThieves: maybe some psychosociologist figured two weeks is the best scam tolerance timeframe
furuknap: What was their original deadline? Weren't the due for going online in June?
mircea_popescu: so wait, two weeks!
ThickAsThieves: it's not the math that is the problem
furuknap: Not the example I'd use, but I get your point :-)
mircea_popescu: best indication ever that auschwitz was a bad idea : the jews didn't fight back at all.
furuknap: OK, the leader (and that's not me, just so you don't think I'm blowing my own horn) needs to understand what people need. They usually say that by fierce opposition.
mircea_popescu: what people want is too widely distributed and also quite likely to kill them.
mircea_popescu: i don't think any leader of any import ever cares what epople want. at issue is what people need.
mircea_popescu: he made it and then there was suddenly a desire for it, five years down the line
furuknap: It does, but the leader also needs to know what people want.
mircea_popescu: arrington didn't appear because there was a desire for tech crunch
mircea_popescu: furuknap usually markets need to be led.
mircea_popescu: pigeons https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206003.0 you seen that ?
furuknap: Exactly, but to get there, there needs to be a desire for professional information that is more visible. I'm testing the market with a new mining book in a few weeks (maybe a couple of months, depending on whether I move from Norway). Having some experience from publishing, I'd use that to understand the market and what people want.
mircea_popescu: i just repeat this periodically on the theory that hey, you never know.
mircea_popescu: hence the "anyone" :p
furuknap: Yeah, I'd love to do that, MP, but seriously, I'm not a finance guy. I understand the math, but I'm more technical than would make me a financial person of any repoute.
truffles: thats the vibe im getting
mircea_popescu: anyone starting a blog now on the topic and sticking to it professionally will be the gigaom/whatever of bitcoin in a decade.
mircea_popescu: anyway, sorta back on topic : bitcoin finance desperately needs analysts, of the real kind
furuknap: SharePoint is more like Notes if you have to compare it to something.
mircea_popescu: lmao the new guy has teeth
furuknap: Yeah, but you also thinks the math looks like it support a price above 1.8.
ThickAsThieves: like if Outlook wanted to be Salesforce or something
furuknap: Think of it as a web base database with tons of services and user configuration and db design. It's an accident waitning to happen (and has happened) but it's widely adopted now.
mircea_popescu: so what's this new thing, microsoft cloud basically ?
furuknap: No, it has nothing to do with Outlook.
furuknap: Yeah, the early stuff was pretty bad and distributed in two versions. One free was an extension of SharePoint and a server verson which was nothing of the sorts.
ThickAsThieves: i think it's server-based Outlook
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves i can't for the life of me recall exactly wehat it was
ThickAsThieves: is that the one that was basically Outlook on a stick?
mircea_popescu: i think they merged half of it into frontpage
mircea_popescu: windows sharepoint was some old, pretty much abandoned stuff ms came out with in i think 2002
furuknap: mp: What stuff is that?
truffles: im easy though
mircea_popescu: not sure if this is related.
mircea_popescu: anyway, i was thinking fo some stuff early 2000s
furuknap: Yup, at least the ones that are available. I've done a couple of private ones too. All IT, though.
mircea_popescu: furuknap so basically they're all on sharepoint ?
furuknap: You can hang on for a couple of days and the next one is out free. I'd be happy to send you other copies though.
ThickAsThieves: I will ask him to post about how he pulls the data though
mircea_popescu: furuknap which books be those ?
ThickAsThieves: oh i didnt mean to sound dfensive
mircea_popescu: i'm just saying you gotta know the basic idea, where he gets the data, stuff like that.
furuknap: This one is free. It's part of a test I'm running to see if I can get a better way of providing information to people. My other 20ish books cost around $20 each.
ThickAsThieves: he gets motivation to keep doing and developing it fiurther
truffles: whats the price range of this book ?
furuknap: Not really old, it came out with the latest version in February.
ThickAsThieves: the guy has been supplying this chart, noted no tips, so I thought hmm, I'll back him up a little and see where it goes