865900+ entries in 0.571s
Duffer1: more news
to spur
this round of buying?
ozbot: What happened
to BitFunder
Kleeck_: In
the US: Bitfunder working fine.
Duffer1: oh meh i don't want
to close all my windows
to
turn on my vpn
to
test hehe
Hollywood: if you proxy outside
the us it is fine
Hollywood: someone else
try bitfunder (seems
to be blocked in
the us only) I can proxy in from outside
the us
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] [PAID] 1.00978800 BTC
to 2`019`576 shares, 50 satoshi per share
Kleeck_: I doubt he had direct access
to
the investors.
Kleeck_: He got
the info from CFIG, I'd assume.
grilledcat: ...where did he get
that from? Can't see it in
the bitcointalk
thread.
grilledcat: When he said "CFIG has confirmed
that
the private investors will NOT sell _any_ of
their shares on havelock, until CFIG is officially in operation (aka, its verifyable
that people have opened accounts with
them and deposited/withdrawn fiat)"...
jurov: oh my... yes, we had
that at uni including arcane details how ethernet frames are
transmitted
thru
dub: speaking of lame, its 2013 and
the guy next
to me just built a 32k ATM circuit
jurov: but
that was quite lame
taub: when not even
the nyse can keep
their shit
together
jurov: but can't
think of any.. or maybe everything was successfully disguised as mistake or feature
jurov: hm, open source software isn't
there since yesterday, so
there should be ample precedent
jurov: it was from fight for madrid (and
they did get
through anyway)
mircea_popescu: basically
this entire
thing will come sooner or later
to yet another rendition of no pasaran.
thestringpuller: mircea_popescu: so if special interests make
there way into
the bitcoin codebase and everyone goes along with it...what
then?
dub: I used
to manage a comunity where it was unusual for a family of 10
to have more
than one email address
jurov: even getting people
to change
the forum was not easy, still only few registered.. i cant imagine
trying irc
jurov: i'd have
to maintain log
then
jurov: we already moved
the forum on
to friend's server after bad experience with forumup paid service
jurov: well, it's something like knitting-circle stuff... pita
to move it elsewhere and explain
to everyone
jurov: i dutifully read
to
the very end
till
that infuriating post
dub: private as in just you, some friends and
te american govt
jurov: so i did a research and found
this
thread, of course many ppl have
this problem and google ain't doing anything
dub: I didn't read
te
tread, what could you possibly need
to
talk
to google about?
jurov: or even better hiring 100s of
them
to
troll google about some problem lol
jurov: now i wonder whether paying some indian pennies
to get me live operator or at least uncanned response would work
mircea_popescu: dub amusiongly, most of
those are solved by idiots who don't want
to pay for games/online content
jurov: solving captchas for pennies does not waste my
time in such straightforward way
jurov: in any case, dunno why i feel betrayed. should have expected
this.
dub: like I said
the monkey just makes a hopefully more intelligent call on which canned answer is sent
dub: we had it so
the first responder was machine only and if
the requester replies it gets punted
to a monkey
dub: you feed it a knowledge base and it choses answers based ont eh content in
the request, can be configured
to fire
those back on
the off chance on of
them is right or a monkey can choose further canned answers
dub: I deployed a widely used system, 'rightnow'
that works along
those lines in a former life
dub: yeah,
the monkeys dont get
to write
their own responce
jurov: dub no, it really looks like only canned responses if you read whole
thread, no need for human
to do
this
Hollywood: Well,
that is what I have always used- I played MLG as MLG jborkl
dub: jurov: its very possible
that
the monkeys paid
to respond
to support just seem like stupid macines
Hollywood: <kakobrekla> why are you hollywood now < Honestly - I have never been clever with nicks, but I am
trying
to build
the news site and forum noobs would rather get news from Hollywood
than jborkl
jurov: welcome
to future, asking something only
to find you were in fact
talking only
to Clippy-like abomination
arij: i dont want
to break something..
arij: does anyone know how
to add a yubikey
to btct.co
nubbins`: but
then i realized
that i was probably just making
things worse :P
nubbins`: for a while, when it got
too bothersome, i would push a 150w bass amp against
the wall and
turn on a drum machine
nubbins`: naturally, i replied with
the same
nubbins`: when she said FUCK YOU as she walked
to
the store
nubbins`: her first words
to me were about 3 months ago
nubbins`: i
think she has me confused with a guy who used
to live here
nubbins`: mildly surprised
that
there's only a $30 difference between anal and "everything"
nubbins`: last year, she was putting hand-written business cards under people's windshield wipers in
the liquor store parking lot
truffles: nubbins` how often u been over
there?
nubbins`: obvious answers is "the kind of man who gets
turned down by normal hookers"
nubbins`: obvious question is "who
the fuck would sleep with her"
kleeck: Do all of her personalities have
tourettes?
nubbins`: my neighbour has
tourette's syndrome and MPD
ozbot: Germany: In Berlin, bitcoins readily replace
the euro | Presseurop.eu: European news, cartoons and p
nubbins`: I'm gonna
try
to get eulora running on osx
mircea_popescu: well he can confirm it as a fact, "i have indeed locked
this many shares" if it is a fact.
jurov: yes,
then just provide url where cfig says
that
mircea_popescu: jurov well
to
the degree
there's a lockout he can state
that much, or anyway confirm a statement by
the owner.
jurov: topace besides
the correct formulation, i find it rather indiscreet
to speak about
transfers between clients
jborkl: okay I have some
time so I am going
to dl it and do a article about it-
that ok with you?
topace: and should probably just stop replying all
together in chat environments where heat of
the moment quick discussions can snowball out of control
jborkl: ok, is finding
the
teleport
thing still going on?
topace: i'll
try
to be more clear and more careful in my
text
mircea_popescu: topace so
then say so eh ? or else have
the laywers you pay fix your
text
topace: i have received verification from cfig, i have not verified
the facts of
these private investors myself.
mircea_popescu: the elements being a. private investors ; b. fiat payment and c. right value for
the shares.
mircea_popescu: no. you have actually stated
that you have verified private investors have paid fiat
to
them for
the shares.
topace: all i've confirmed so far is
that CFIG has confirmed
that
the private investors have invested in USD directly
to CFIG in exchange for shares pushed
to
their havelock account
mircea_popescu: Duffer1 i am saying it is motherfucking insane on a stick for
topace
to make
that sort of statement about
things he has absolutely no way of veryifying