818900+ entries in 0.524s

mircea_popescu: then as various ignorant noobs got added
that figure
they "know shit" and "have businesses" and so on...
mircea_popescu: that eventually is misplaced. it originally was
the case, back in 2011.
pankkake: it's
the first characters of
the fingerprint or something? anyway, it shouldn't be relied on, but sadly it is
thestringpuller: thus as long as
the keyserver isn't compromised you can
trust
the key distribution?
thestringpuller: i would assume
that
the keyservers WoT uses will eventually encompass
the bitcoin community
that matters no?
pankkake: beware
that
the small fingerprint you often see can have collisions
pankkake: well you should only
trust
the *fingerprint*, no matter how
the key is distributed
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller
the system i now use works on
the assumption either A or B are famous.
thestringpuller: what is
the best system for public key distribution
that enforces validity?
pankkake: I know… but I also have
TAT in my
trust root
pankkake: just being sloppy
then abandonning his PTs
thestringpuller: what'd he do again? he did
those passthru's but what happened?
thestringpuller: pankkake: you can still profit on
that action
though even if you're a real investor
mircea_popescu: here's an idea : if you dont have a mpex acct youre
too poor
to be an investor.
pankkake: pump
the scam
to death, praise shitty action because it profits
them, etc
pankkake: but even
the so-called investors
pankkake: it's not about issuers. yes, most of
them don't care
to make
their investors whole
thestringpuller: unfortunately history can be "modified" after
the fact, but I
think
that is GPG contract's greatest assets
mircea_popescu: but
take nanotube. he doesn't say much, but was here since before me, and he ain't scamming anyone.
thestringpuller: because
they want all
the money now without providing any value
mircea_popescu: the cave early behaviour partially
to blame. also,
the first few years everyone was new by
the very definition.
Apocalyptic: don't expect some random dude opening a bitcointalk post about his service
to be legit
mircea_popescu: no good reason
to care,
tbh,
their problem, let
them fix it.
mircea_popescu: with freedom comes
the horde of people who misunderstand what freedom is all about.
Apocalyptic: well scammers gonna scam,
that's what
they do, and in bitcoinland
there's a
ton of
them
pankkake: just a general feeling
that any of
these guys would scam if
they could
pankkake: but really, fuck all
this shit
thestringpuller: Based on
this formula, Havelock should be shutting down any day now.
thestringpuller: I
think
there is a correlation between an exchange's life expectancy and
the quality of
the "businesses" it IPO's
thestringpuller: mircea_popescu, what
the heck foo? Keeping
the price from reaching pluto
mircea_popescu: so if i google sweets for my sweet result #2 is
the drifters (black ppl), #3 is
the searchers (white people)
gribble: MtGox BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 740.0, Best ask: 745.0, Bid-ask spread: 5.00000, Last
trade: 745.0, 24 hour volume: 45162.82997989, 24 hour low: 653.0001, 24 hour high: 860.0, 24 hour vwap: 731.95439
gribble: MtGox BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 762.01529, Best ask: 769.99999, Bid-ask spread: 7.98470, Last
trade: 760.23281, 24 hour volume: 48633.24355535, 24 hour low: 653.0001, 24 hour high: 860.0, 24 hour vwap: 745.14452
KRS|gotyawallet: claudioc: anyone wanna donate some coins
to me?? i have no way
to payoff
this 2nd mortgage now... c mon guys u have my money at least let me get 0.1 btc
KRS|gotyawallet: The robot voice in
that song makes me imagine a giant doomsday alien robot on armageddon day destroying a city and killing people with laser-ray eyes and explosive charges launching from devices mounted
to its hands.
random_cat: i logged into bitfailure and wedontexchange and see
the ukto has followed
through with
the shuffel of assets
ruru: as long as
this place isn't panicking, i
think we're good.
ruru: it was panic.. Dumped @ low 600s, put a bid @ 600..
then, pulled it for some reason. He wasn't at
the right state of mind.
Duffer1: i can empathize with
the scammed, but not
those on
the losing end of speculation
ruru: lost around 57 btc in
the process
ruru: let
them panick.. my poor buddy sold.. 400+ BTC, got $280k.
then.. guess what. Bought back when BTC rebounded. He got fucked bothways by
the market
KRS|gotyawallet: thats
true forgot all
that its been good for a while..good point..
mircea_popescu: already ? it's been
the
talk of
the
town ever since we started raping
the
town
mircea_popescu: <the20year1> Not exactly , our attourney says
that it's quite possible for
them
to be SEC compliant <<< we've gone
through
this cycle about 20
times already.
Apocalyptic: you
think
they will seriously consider such an offer ?
the20year1: i know i'd be willing
to chip in for
that :D
the20year1: I'll message my contact and see if
they can get a quote
the20year1: I
think
that's a fantastic idea duffer
Duffer1: the20year1 if you know someone involved with ciphertrade personally get
them
to approach lloyd's of london for
theft insurance contract
Apocalyptic: fortunately someone here corrected me and linked
that post
Duffer1: interesting Apoc,
the way
the ciphertrade
thread reads on litecointalk.org
they make it sound like he's in on
the ground floor
the20year1: I
think 'founders' are more complicated, according
to my brother who is involved with
the startup in some way
Apocalyptic: sounds pretty clear
to me he's not involved in any way, let alone being a "founder" as you say
the20year1: Not exactly , our attourney says
that it's quite possible for
them
to be SEC compliant
Apocalyptic: "the new exchange being developed/run by
the Ciphermine
team. But we are NOT committed (in
the sense of having promised
to go
there)
to it - and, at present, I am not committed
to being involved either as part of
the operational
team for it OR as an investor in it."
Duffer1: they're going
to run into sec issues
the20year1: I just hope
that
they build a framework, or someone does
that won't run into SEC issues
Apocalyptic: I bet she likes
to advertise it so, for obvious PR reasins
Duffer1: i like
that Deprived is on board with
that project
mike_c: coinbr is a good place
to start
Duffer1: kate's demonstrated
trustworthiness, but competence remains
to be seen
the20year1: I just really would like
to get back on an exchange
the20year1: I'm looking at cipertrade, looks good
to me
Duffer1: one with known members of community
that have demonstrated
trustworthiness over a very long period of
time
ozbot: Will it Blend - Patriot Flash Drive (original full length
take) - YouTube
kakobrekla: >For many different reasons, such as for instance described in IV. Disposal. Also because
the wear-levelling optimisation most SSDs natively employ makes it nigh-on impossible
to actually delete anything you ever put on
them. [?]
Azelphur: mircea_popescu: would be interesting
to see, probably could get it from user agent statistics if you have
them