log☇︎
745400+ entries in 0.488s
asciilifeform: waiting for timoshenko et al to proclaim that yesterday's 'leaked nixon tape' of her asking fellow ua fucktards 'can't we find a nuke with which to cleanse the russian scum' - in perfect russian - is fake
mircea_popescu: some california producer that made butter out of its own milk was forced to stop selling it because it had an unfair advantage.
Mats_cd03: Back to Bataan i haven't seen in some time
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform ThickAsThieves amusingly, there was recently a very similar case re milk.
mircea_popescu: Lawrence Tierney was pretty cool
Mats_cd03: Should've watched tom cruise for pro tips http://youtu.be/UiqwF_Y9S5Q
Mats_cd03: "While the Assisting Trooper attempted unsuccessfully to draw his handgun" the 2 second rule nearly prevails once again
asciilifeform: from the loltron:
asciilifeform: tldr - government report excusing the execution of a famous suspect, claims that he reached for... a sword.
ThickAsThieves: The Court decided that Filburn's wheat growing activities reduced the amount of wheat he would buy for chicken feed on the open market, and because wheat was traded nationally, Filburn's production of more wheat than he was allotted was affecting interstate commerce. Thus, Filburn's production could be regulated by the federal government.
asciilifeform: because not burning it could affect the market price.
asciilifeform: the losing side (a farmer) was required to burn his crop.
asciilifeform: (anyone who thinks that this is an exaggeration, look up the case)
asciilifeform: and hence it would have affected the price of bottled farts interstate markets
asciilifeform: because you could have bottled and sold the fart
asciilifeform: then, there was a court case, where they ruled that, in essence, a fart is 'interstate commerce'
asciilifeform: intro for noobs. in the u.s., the central government was once traditionally limited to regulating 'interstate commerce'
blackwhite: the IRS in Denmark ruled it's not taxable
blackwhite: The IRS in the US ruled it's property
asciilifeform: required reading to understand how u.s. totalitarian system got its beginning
gribble: Wickard v. Filburn - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn>; Wickard v. Filburn | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of ...: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1942/1942_59/>; Wickard v. Filburn – Case Brief Summary - Lawnix: <http://www.lawnix.com/cases/wickard-filburn.html>
asciilifeform: blackwhite: no such thing. the decree sums to 'as taxable as cement'
blackwhite: IRS just ruled that its not taxable
ozbot: Bitcoin Is Property Not Currency in Tax System, IRS Says - Bloomberg
asciilifeform: if it existed, it would gravitationally move the planet's spammers and 'seo' scum the way the moon moves the ocean.
mircea_popescu: electric tape ftw.
asciilifeform: this reminds me of an idea that i (and probably everybody) had at one point - a betting engine with auto-resolution using google (or some other mechanical process)
mircea_popescu: as opposed to, "how do i make money ?" "like this"
mircea_popescu: moreover, the whole thing is begging the question. "how do you make money if you know how to make money already ?" "in the manner you know".
asciilifeform: i was assuming that the proposal is about bitbet as it currently exists - where bests in the style of 'boxing match' are heavily represented
mircea_popescu: sort-of like saying "i have no need to use computers because i already know what 2+2 comes to"
mircea_popescu: sure, but that's an entire different story than what we're doing here.
asciilifeform: i was thinking of a far more mundane aspect, where the best source of info re: the outcome of, say, athletic match, isn't 1000 googles, but the boxer who can decide to 'throw' the match
mircea_popescu: misses the point that you'd have to construct that inefficiency first, which precludes the use economically.
mircea_popescu: so in general arguing "in this inefficient case the inefficiency could be used like so"
asciilifeform: polite gentleman offers 100x the usual price
mircea_popescu: (ie, in a free market neither the gru nor the nazis could have existed)
asciilifeform: western tech co. wants to sell, forbidden by own government
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform no, they did not. see, it wasn't a free market, but at the other end of things
asciilifeform: actually gru usually bought on the free market
mircea_popescu: 're thinking theft.
asciilifeform: eh, it was never infinity. not even close to $maxint.
ThickAsThieves: the word "generally" appears 8 times in the IRS release
mircea_popescu: except the price in that edge case is infinity.
asciilifeform: if 'watch' is a west german tank engine, and i'm 'gru', then it is worth 100x the price, no?
mircea_popescu: (trivially, your curiosity as to what's inside a watch isn't worth the pirce of a watch)
mircea_popescu: it's unlikely you'll be able to breach the former in order to benefit the latter
blackwhite: so regarding the bitcoin as property. What does that mean if I get bitcoin for the work I am doing?
mircea_popescu: you are comparing unlike things.
mike_c: good handicappers at the racetrack know a shitload more than me about horses.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform hence the "mine google" approach
asciilifeform: e.g. the ones who 'know', with a good degree of confidence, that difficulty will drop on day x, because they can personally pull the plug on a chinese minerfarm - etc
mike_c: that is the case for all parimutuel wagering
asciilifeform: perhaps i'm thick, but it still seems to me like the biggest winners on bitbet ought to be folks sitting on the right side of an information asymmetry.
thestringpuller: totally worth a trilema coin
thestringpuller: that's one of the best trilema articles I've read
mircea_popescu: but because bitcoin allows such fine payments, you're right, you can do this on a cup of coffee
wao-ender: I suggest it as milion dollar idea w/o one dollar, that one dollar you already have in your pocket
Duffer1: it must be something else cause to me this is hilarious
mircea_popescu: course, i think they were talking of something else. inasmuch as there can be "something else" in the swamp.
Duffer1: that's right, apparently without a contract, multiple people pooled resources to create CipherTrade and didn't figure out who will own what
ozbot: How to have fun as an intelligent person pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
Duffer1: they have yet to figure out who gets what percentage...
ThickAsThieves: well more that i respect you have better ability to discern proper rng, crypto, etc than i
asciilifeform: everything there is to know about rng is 1950s state of the art.
asciilifeform: ThickAsThieves: i do hope that you don't think me to be some sort of rng hero
asciilifeform: plenty of industrial systems, etc. still run on dos 5 and later - but, fortunately, the source (largely asm) was leaked years ago.
asciilifeform: BingoBoingo: Microsoft releases source code << carefully calculated insult to the public - dos 1.1
ozbot: Microsoft releases source code for MS-DOS and Word | Ars Technica
nubbins`: why is the table a table?
nubbins`: well, y'know why is anything the way it is?
nubbins`: colloquially, it's used the same way
pankkake: I didn't know the AP style guide existed, I've been meaning to read the Economist one
pankkake: nubbins`: why isn't "over" the same as "more than"?
BingoBoingo: It's what I've been trying to do.
mike_c: that one seems right though
nubbins`: they now allow "over" as a synonym of "more than"
nubbins`: can't trust AP style tips anymore
BingoBoingo: Related to an earlier discussion
ozbot: Twitter / APStylebook: AP Style tip: Bitcoin is a ...
El3k0n: I didn't made that
ThickAsThieves: he makes random numbers too
El3k0n: ThickAsThieves The world financial system implodes
ThickAsThieves: how does one discern a reasonable trade value from an unreasonable one?
ThickAsThieves: so if i trade you intellectual proprty for bitcoins, a black hole forms?
mircea_popescu: novusordo that's not realisation. when you sell it, you report the income.
mircea_popescu: i dunno who'd live in a jurisdiction that takes any other tack to the problem, or why.
mircea_popescu: seems to me the only sane treatment of btc is as any other intangible, taxable only upon realisation.
thestringpuller: If you receive BTC as a gift doesn't a different tax apply?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform the difference between cement and btc is that i can hit you over the head with the cement.
asciilifeform: if you pay in cement, that's traditionally taxable, etc.
asciilifeform: ianal, but nothing shocking here - usg is treating btc the same as gold, cement, bags of xxxxx good
ThickAsThieves: it doesnt really say how to determine an exchange rate other than to be consistent
novusordo: took them that long to come up with this?
ThickAsThieves: Yes, the fair-market value of the currency (in U.S. dollars) on the date the payment was received is considered to be income. For more information on exchange rates, see the notice.
ThickAsThieves: If a taxpayer receives a payment in virtual currency, is it considered income?
ozbot: IRS declares that bitcoin will be taxed as property — Tech News and Analysis
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: who needs tournament. the coin would suffice - 'Быть всегда впереди - вот награда твоя!' ('to be always ahead - this shall be your reward!' from well-known sov. song)
thestringpuller: wao-ender: so you're going to create an AI bot?
wao-ender: like betting what weather would be tomorrow.