log☇︎
735100+ entries in 0.469s
mircea_popescu: where's this ?
jborkl: mircea, to go along with your point - I send my kids to private school 6 and 4 years old. The 6 year old can do algebra, multiplication, read, write and knows some of the periodic table < public school peers are very far behind
mircea_popescu: even if the world laughs at them, they've... tried.
mircea_popescu: so in this sense, as far as the forum is concerned, having made that bet proposition is good enough.
pankkake: two *working* programs? that's better than most
nubbins`: had to teach myself, essentially from scratch
nubbins`: mircea_popescu trying things isn't required. i have a CS degree even though i only made two working programs during the course of my degree
mircea_popescu: nubbins` indeed. i routinely meet 20somethings who have not actually tried ANYTHING the past decade.
pLambert: failling and shares dropping are not exactly the same
mircea_popescu: pLambert if one then why not the other as well ?
nubbins`: mircea_popescu the true horror of this situation won't be realized for another few decades
mircea_popescu: this has resulted in a generationful of people who can do nothing but and nothing other than "convincingly" trying.
nubbins`: namely that bitbet would continue to function
nubbins`: well you're making some assumptions there
mircea_popescu: since about the 90s or so, basic us education has been filtering quite perversely : you get an a or a+ for succeeding at the task, usually an a or rarely a b "for effort" by delivering a credible simulacra of having tried, and an f or rarely a c for actually trying and failing.
pLambert: well, say you have some shares of s.mpoe. If mp gets arrested, their price will go down, I think. so if you bet that mp will get arrested, it will offset the loss from your shares?
mircea_popescu: while he does i wanna pontificate on the following theme :
mircea_popescu: sounds like a ton of publicity.
mircea_popescu: "mp arrested for the crime of being mean to forum dwellers and bureaucrats"
pLambert: but it might be useful to bet on yes, cause who knows what will happen to mpex investments if mp gets arrested, sort of a hedge?
pankkake: it's not that they don't have the funds, I've offered very small bets. it's that they don't even believe themselves
mircea_popescu: the incidental that they can't afford food anyway notwithstanding
mircea_popescu: reminds me of the principled 20somethings that are on a diet
mircea_popescu: nubbins` yeah, it'd totally be the principle :p
nubbins`: pLambert: also, the btctalk crowd who would love to see MP extradited also probably would never send a single satoshi to bitbet, purely on principle
mircea_popescu: turned out the guy's budget was maybe .1 or something like that.
mircea_popescu: and there was some derpage about s.mpoe falling on the forum if i recall
mircea_popescu: thus if submitter places a 10btc bet he is in effect going "i'm not tryin' to mooch ya"
nubbins`: someone could just put 100btc on yes and then fly to russia and beat the shit out of them
mircea_popescu: pLambert bitbet charges 1% of the pool, and puts .1 btc on the new bets.
pankkake: yeah but the tough bitcointalk guys don't bet
nubbins`: pLambert ah, too true
nubbins`: bunch of cossacks whipped them with knotted ropes
pLambert: I don't think they allow bets about people getting hurt or killed?
TomServo: Didn't that actually happen?
pLambert: I thought the guys at bitcointalk who are so sure MP is going to get dragged across the ocean would like to put some money on it?
nubbins`: pLambert "Consider submitting with substantial paid wager" is a common rejection reason. not sure if there's a cut-and-dry minimum, but i've seen bets with 0.0x btc on either side
pankkake: I like this bet
pankkake: first time I see such rejection
benkay```: Rejection reason: If you're going to play the cool internet cat, go get some BTC, then submit your retardation with paid wager.
benkay```: Mircea Popescu will be arrested and extradited to the US in 2014
pLambert: "Rejection reason: If you're going to play the cool internet cat, go get some BTC, then submit your retardation with paid wager." How much do you need to bet to get a bitbet accepted?
mircea_popescu: ah the guy's so good.
mircea_popescu: "Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing."
dexx: isn't this your website? and nvm: it's back up for me now
kakobrekla: kraken will trade you dead grandmother if the logo is nice. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla aha! i wish i remembered what it was supposed to be trading for back in 2012
Namworld: Ah yes, this point about too much security/regulation is excellent.
mircea_popescu: o yeah, which reminds me, how is ven, the revolutionary currency of the internet nefario discovered somewhere ?
bounce apparently (well, generally ignoring the drama over there) haven't kept up enough to see that
mircea_popescu: think it through.
mircea_popescu: but seriously, i tell you you can't have a new car and you close down the fucking parks in response ?
pLambert: promises? you mean the things Obama said he would do, and then didn't do even though he clearly has the authority to do them already?
bounce: that deliberate then?
bounce: not too much on the promises made though
pLambert: bounce: already the president makes executive orders to do whatever he wants
mircea_popescu: admittedly a bar too high.
mircea_popescu: the only way out was toi have obama hung for the crows to peck at for two months, on capitol hill.
mircea_popescu: that was a test, it was failed, congress is going away.
mircea_popescu: not even the point that it failed, their attempt, but congressional dignity proved an empty word.
mircea_popescu: recently they tried to enforce the power of the purse and were made a mockery of for it.
benkay```: internet is wacky today
benkay```: wow how'd i get to three tacks
bounce: presidential order kicking out congress? that's going to be some riot.
bounce: you know, discering a signal, framing, all that jazz
bounce: "coding specialist" is someone who knows about "line coding" and such. more or less what the w3c tried (and inevitably failed) to conveniently can with xml
mircea_popescu: You can’t stop all fraud. Some will get through your defenses. Currency exchange profit margins are too narrow to absorb much of it, so you need a healthy legitimate customer base across whom you can distribute those costs. As chargebacks come in, it’s tempting to focus entirely on eliminating fraud. Unfortunately, that focus inconveniences legitimate customers so much that they go elsewhere.
mircea_popescu: obviously clueless kids left to reproduce irl the emperor of flies circus going on in their head wouldn't know about it.
ozbot: Adnotated words of wisdom on the topic of online fraud pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
Namworld: Soon they'll ask for blood samples.
Namworld: I know about Bitstamp verifications... it's lulzy. They ask for more dox than the government itself or banks.
asciilifeform: or, for that matter, arsecoin
kakobrekla: lel, moar of this.
asciilifeform: this is one of those things where i can't help but think that anyone who pays for it - deserves what he gets
asciilifeform: the results, for those who have not witnessed this personally, are usually exactly what one would expect.
asciilifeform: a human compiler is a kind of wretch, usually overseas, who is nominally paid to turn 'human' language spec into a program.
asciilifeform: the latter usually referring to a 'human compiler'
mircea_popescu: was a hooker called a "slime technician" ?
asciilifeform: feels a little like the '90s american fashion of calling janitor 'building engineer'
truffles: sounds like some1 that knows all about "coding"
asciilifeform: (perhaps i ought to know better than to ask such questions...)
truffles: ofc not, chat rooms arent meant to have conversations..
Urushiol: purple, I think
pLambert: isn't that how irc is supposed to work?
mircea_popescu: i think two unrelated convos became cojoined at the hip here
Urushiol: that's what I thought you meant.
pLambert: oops, should have responded to Urushol, not asciilifeform
Urushiol: I believe it's in the prospectus, no? It was months ago that I read it last so I can't recall for certain.
pLambert: yes, right. so what is that amount?
Urushiol: and take their projected expenses as assumptions
Urushiol: pLambert: it will give you a max though
Urushiol: mircea_popescu: it would require coding specialists mostly, which we have already. just get volume for each fund in that time frame and apply HIF's percentage returns. I haven't finished my Python quite yet, otherwise I would attack it.
asciilifeform: i think i missed something
pLambert: asciilifeform: I don't think you can just take volume, who knows how much they will take out for expenses?
mike_c: bitbet has certainly published a lot of their addresses by now. hopefully they have good RNG!
mircea_popescu: ;;google are you the brain specialist
asciilifeform: and not only signature, but small bits of encryption as well. anyone who doesn't grasp this mustn't wait, but open a textbook and work out what happens if you rsa a small bit of whatever, without padding.
Urushiol: mircea_popescu: what I find particularly surprising is that it wasn't calculated by the community already, given volume is available through the API
mircea_popescu: "how thick is a width of a meter ?" "dude dunno, as thick as the wind blowing may make it seem. otherwise, it's wide"
mircea_popescu: kinda what happens when you try to measure things by orthogonal measures.