log☇︎
729400+ entries in 0.367s
minersdidit: you cant value your work when the meter stick you are using is a rubber band
danielpbarron: idk, i think these only appear to be problems to individuals who still have a foot in FIAT
minersdidit: and im not talking about fiat price
Duffer1: it's worth x btc, what people choose to price that in fiat is a separate matter
minersdidit: lol dude you cant even tell me what your work was worth an hour ago
Duffer1: simply because the market wants it to?
minersdidit: duffer1 um no you dont work for bitcoins when the volatility is so insane you cant measure what your work is even worth.
Duffer1: why would it issue more than you work for?
minersdidit: when that mechanism was removed it collapsed
Duffer1: minersdiditwhen the market needs bitcoin theres no mechanism to supply them >>> you work for money, that's the mechanism
minersdidit: thats the only way the gold standard functioned
minersdidit: no for bitcoin to work you need some decentralized system that works on the real bills doctrine
danielpbarron: yeah and i'll buy them
minersdidit: when that wanes out, you get insane volatility to the downside as the algo keeps supplying useless coins
danielpbarron: ok so you want something like bitcoin, but with.. more inflation? or a backdoor to let devs tweak the block reward?
minersdidit: when the market needs bitcoin theres no mechanism to supply them other then the set in stone linear 3600 coins, this brings insane price volatility to the upside
minersdidit: learn to read i am making sense
danielpbarron: well then start making sense
minersdidit: typical bitcoin shill. instantly brings up the fiat strawman that was never discussed in the first place
Duffer1: for only 11,200 btc you can be the proud owners of 40% of YET ANOTHER havelol startup
danielpbarron: even if the central bank was better at stabilizing prices (it isn't) that wouldn't make up for the corruption inherent in giving that much power to one authority
Duffer1: anyways have you guys heard the great news?
minersdidit: a troll
danielpbarron: you are making the argument that a central bank knows better than a decentralized network
minersdidit: hence the insane volatility
minersdidit: no there arent.
danielpbarron: you must have your eyes closed then, because there are tens of thousands of "mechanisms"
minersdidit: miners create coins regardless of market needs for them, this increases volatility when they drain the liquidity pools
minersdidit: danielpbarron of course they are true. we can observe it occuring
danielpbarron: bitcoin does indeed have many meechanisms to supply
minersdidit: making it impossible to use as settlement.
danielpbarron: minersdidit: the things you are saying are not true
minersdidit: my assertions are baseless look at the price goes from 80 to 1200 back down
minersdidit: its based on quantity theory
Duffer1: you mean you're ignoring the technical superiority in favor of your baseless assertions
minersdidit: when the market demands for money increase bitcoin has no mechanism to supply it and vice versa
mike_c: what money are you talking about? m1?
danielpbarron: i'm trying to understand you
minersdidit: ie the supply
minersdidit: im argueing the flawed economics behind the coin creation
minersdidit: im not argueing the superior technicalities
danielpbarron: what does that even mean
minersdidit: danielpbarron: because economies are fractals they arent linear
Duffer1: instant, secure, worldwide, private value transmission does not = gold
minersdidit: 100% gold standard did the exact same thing
Duffer1: i don't see how you can say that when nothing like bitcoin has existed before
minersdidit: money has to be elastic it cant be static ie linear
danielpbarron: there are 629 mechanisms in there
minersdidit: whats a trading post got to do with anything lol
danielpbarron: i guess you've never been to #bitcoin-otc
minersdidit: you have no mechanisms that respond to market demands for money
minersdidit: its not about price stability that is absurd as well
minersdidit: yea you arent very bright. the economics are flawed you have insane costs
danielpbarron: i'd rather have a volitile good money than a stable bad money
danielpbarron: I find it to be very useful; I'm not alone
minersdidit: impossible to use as settlement
minersdidit: or when value rises theres no mechanism to supply the market
minersdidit: bitcoin follows quantity theory of money which is flawed.
danielpbarron: yeah the devs should have written it to give 50 billion units to their friends every month so it could be more like the dollar
minersdidit: bitcoins shitty economic algo killed the value
minersdidit: bitcoin will probably be back to single digits by the time they settle that mess
MisterE: handed over in terms of "take my exchange, please"
danielpbarron: does that mean all those GoxCoins are worth something after all?
jborkl_: Mircea , you see the mtgox news yet? Not that is any surprise
gribble: (ticker [--bid|--ask|--last|--high|--low|--avg|--vol] [--currency XXX] [--market <market>|all]) -- Return pretty-printed ticker. Default market is Bitstamp. If one of the result options is given, returns only that numeric result (useful for nesting in calculations). If '--currency XXX' option is given, returns ticker for that three-letter currency code. It is up to you to make sure the (1 more message)
SatoshiJack: I hear ya mp... my issue is how to generate the transactions --- and send --- blockr does not provide -- but it's all good -- we are working around :)
mircea_popescu: SatoshiJack there is really no diff between bitcoin and altcoin addy gen. same algo.
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 357.04, Best ask: 357.58, Bid-ask spread: 0.54000, Last trade: 357.04, 24 hour volume: 50103.19440652, 24 hour low: 357.04, 24 hour high: 442.46, 24 hour vwap: 398.721153266
benkay: why don't you bring the link
CheckDavid: And I thought the skin was British
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 361.0, Best ask: 363.12, Bid-ask spread: 2.12000, Last trade: 363.12, 24 hour volume: 49912.39410578, 24 hour low: 357.57, 24 hour high: 442.46, 24 hour vwap: 398.8274112
ozbot: Bitcoin firms dumped by National Australia Bank as 'too risky' | World news | theguardian.com
midnightmagic: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/10/bitcoin-dumped-by-national-australia-bank-as-too-risky ah you mean that. Lame.
blackwhite: so whats going on with btc? was it the australian bank that caused the drop?
benkay: just look how fucking fast that thing tears itself apart
benkay: once upon a time i took 2nd place in physics for attempting to quantify polarization of light coming through a prd as a proxy for embedded stress
benkay: coulda sworn they were different
ozbot: Badger Badger Badger.com The Original Dancing Badgers!
SatoshiJack: I will give you full details in a day or so -- we are going through the code now -- and figuring out what we have tobuild for it --- our big thing is -- how we generate address etc... I need to be able to generate like 1000 or so at a time -- and also to be able to submit transactions similar to how brainwallet.org works with blockchain.info for transaction submits...
benkay: different addresses, tho
SatoshiJack: nope -- I don't think so -- no way to have it autogenerate based on the rules for atc... they will have to add support which would mean tweaking code for determinsitc wallets etc...
jurov: SatoshiJack: brainwallet should work with atc out of the box, no?
SatoshiJack: mp,tat -- you guys need to get some people building around atc! I've tried contacting the Brainwallet.org devs -- but no luck getting them to show atc some love...
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 380.28, Best ask: 380.62, Bid-ask spread: 0.34000, Last trade: 380.28, 24 hour volume: 43714.37060882, 24 hour low: 375.0, 24 hour high: 444.26, 24 hour vwap: 403.597670398
mircea_popescu: it matters not that ther world is full of mastodons as long as two mice are fucking somewhere.
asciilifeform: a turd 'by any other name would smell as...'
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform here's the thing : bitcoin finally creates the possibility for natural selection.
asciilifeform: all the buggers had to do was rename it 'pki'
asciilifeform: all the noise people made about key escrow in the '90s - they swallowed it in the end regardless.
cazalla: thought*.. going back to bed, damn baby crying all night and can't even focus on spelling
asciilifeform: as if ssl were useful if it worked as printed on the box.
cazalla: still, never though indians writing 250 word articles for $3 would scale like it did
fluffypony: asciilifeform: aren't we moving towards SSL on everything forever?
asciilifeform: what's the excuse for a blog using ssl anyway?
cazalla: fluffypony: i wouldn't go that far, more like loving adwords and their pushing their own products into every profitable vertical
mircea_popescu: cazalla that's been dead for a while.
mircea_popescu: fluffypony my wicked heart smiled when the thing was announced and schneier had to write an article about how he is affected. i on the other side, did not.
cazalla: nothing now, i just use to run spam blogs fill with adsense
bounce: s/here the/here/
bounce: now the race is on to see who can post their secret key here the first