723900+ entries in 0.437s
rithm is just curious what
the actual real world consequences of a bitcointalk.org scammer
tag are
rithm: sorry, i mean
thermos, he goes by
thermos now
rithm: is
theymos a scammer?
rithm: does a scammer
tag on
the forum have nay relevance at all?
rithm: foum is full of
them
rithm: why he still hangs around
though i dunno he's juvenile
rithm: i used
to
think he paid no one but I've since learned differently
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B.MINE] [PAID] 3.46002048 BTC
to 8`421 shares, 41088 satoshi per share
ozbot: The Bitcoin Drama
Timeline pe
Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
TomServo: TestingUnoDosTre: 9 September 2012 Matthew Neal Wright (mentioned above) had been offering interested parties bets on whether
the Bitcoin Savings and
Trust will fail or not. Numerous people
took
the bet, MNW failed
to pay out when
the collapse of
that Ponzi scheme became fact. Consequently scammertagged in
the forum.
Duffer1: sorry man
that all was before my
time, not sure what all happened
TestingUnoDosTre: I'm just beginning
to read
the mathew n Wright forum. Anyone want
to give me a summary of
the ending first?
numerisTrade: I was wondering why are you voicing me. I mean,
that's kind of you, but...
nubbins`: hmm, Voicing numerisTrade without
time-limit?
ozbot: Lagwagon Let's
Talk About Feelings (full album) - YouTube
nubbins`: only if
they're
thin and green
davout: nubbins`: wanna light some jasmine candles and
talk about our feelings?
assbot: Voicing numerisTrade without
time-limit.
nubbins`: too complicated, can't we just share all
this stuff on
the network drive?
nubbins`: "does encryption still make sense, now
that we're looser
than ever with our sensitive data?"
nubbins`: "does PGP public-key encryption still meet
today's enterprise demands, given
the rise of cloud computing and mobile?"
ozbot: Oleg Andreev - BitUndo can destroy instant 0-confirmation
transactions
TestingUnoDosTre: Assembly is such a wise ass. Its like yah dude I know
the deal, I'm in here eryday
mircea_popescu: i dunno how far i'd
trust
them
to stick with it, but so far it's been encouraging people.
mircea_popescu: pankkake earlier
this small island in
the channel said it won't impose regulations
ozbot: 'PGP' encryption has had stay-powering but does it meet
today's enterprise demands? - CSO |
The Reso
dub: oh,
then write it on a hotdog and
throw it up
the hallway
that was his ass
BingoBoingo: Also blog seems very responsive nao
that
ticket was filed
fluffypony: jurov: yes, but I didn't have
Trilema in my feeds a year ago
BingoBoingo fills out a support
ticket and awaits bitcoin prices
that can support a 1U server rack from endowment funds.
BingoBoingo: It has been slow
this past hour or so on
the control panel, but
the web side was responsive.
joecool: BingoBoingo: only been waiting like 30s for it
to load
fluffypony: BingoBoingo: my nick / name wasn't mentioned on
the post, except in
the screenshot of
the
thread, so discovery would've been
tricky
fluffypony: maybe mircea should email people he blogs about so
that
they know
fluffypony: although I didn't know of its existence
till it was pointed out
BingoBoingo: fluffypony: You remember
the
title better
than I... ;;google
title
BingoBoingo: Well,
this stuff has
to be in
the logs for future reference. I mean how old was
the
Trilema when she
took
the pic?
fluffypony: not since
the last
time someone insulted her
fluffypony: BingoBoingo: good, she's gone
to gym already
BingoBoingo: Tell anyone new
to fuck
themselves recently?
BingoBoingo: "They will not indict you because you are a bad operator.
They will indict you because you are
there. I overturned my verdict only because I am an asshole. "
BingoBoingo: "Weev: One can abandon
their citizenship in a
tyranny for more reasonable shores.
That’s about it. “Three Felonies a Day” is a great book explaining
the commonplace reality of capricious indictments."
ozbot: Weev
Talks About Life In Prison And His Plans
To Open A Hedge Fund,
TRO LLC |
TechCrunch
fluffypony: BingoBoingo: I was
thinking more like
TF
BingoBoingo: fluffypony: Like MNW? In his case
there is no way
to know
that he ever had a stash.
fluffypony: I wonder if guys like
that hoard
their stash or end up living
the high life for a few months before being broke?
BingoBoingo: HeySteve: Honestly
the biggest plus of bitcoin is
that it compels WoT
fluffypony: but
there's literally no other reason
to
trust
them
than
they have a couple of months of not screwing anyone over
fluffypony: and because
they've paid back
they're considered
trustworthy
BingoBoingo: numerisTrade: For
the
time in
the interim I offer you
the ability
to self up so
that you can answer questions on your lending venture and establish value with others or undertake some sort of risk
to honor.
fluffypony: what's interesting about WoT vs. something like BTCJam's profiles is
that WoT makes
the long-con substantially more difficult
BingoBoingo: numerisTrade: Well I plan
to remove/expire
this loaned
trust on
Thursday unless we can find something
to risk and establish a longer
term lending of
trust over.
BingoBoingo: ;;rate numerisTrade 1
Trust offered on credit
fluffypony: ;;rate HeySteve 2 ~$500 ZAR interbank (EFT)
transfer for my BTC/LTC, smooth like pineapple juice
HeySteve: thanks you
trusted me for about $500, I will return
the favour
HeySteve: hey fluffypony,
that reminds me, would you rate me for
that deal we did?
fluffypony: or even changing
their rating
to negative based on
their observation of it
BingoBoingo: fluffypony: Well coming and asking is
the ony way a WoT works.
fluffypony: it seems
to me
that it should be
the latter, but all
too often it's
the former
BingoBoingo: fluffypony: I mean people can /ignore, but if
the person who socially engineers
trust for
the purpose of spamming gets
to self up,
the only recourse is for
the L1
to remove
their
trust or
themselves be dropped
fluffypony: or will
they, BEFORE
trading/borrowing/whatevering, come
to you and say "why do you
trust X?"
fluffypony: will
those scammed come back
to you and say "I
trusted X because you
trusted
them!"
fluffypony: if
the newcomer ends up being a scammer, for instance
BingoBoingo: But on
the matter of +m being a
thing, isn't
the person with L1
trust offering a chance at L2
trust
taking a substantial risk
fluffypony: which means
the educated user won't
trust way beyond
that
fluffypony: and
the amount will surely be mentioned in
the rating
fluffypony: and
the WOT will link
the new party back
to you
fluffypony: well we're
talking about establishing a baseline
BingoBoingo: fluffypony: Well, what if
the newcoming party is especially new?
fluffypony: and
the risk
to both parties is minimal
BingoBoingo: fluffypony: What are your
thoughts on
this unescrowed bet as an entante
that might establish a measure of
trust?
BingoBoingo: "ah
that's bad form, a man honours his debts" and "assbot removes voice from Ukyo" Fortuitous? Maybe I am just drunk and dense?