log☇︎
717200+ entries in 0.442s
pankkake: well no, fractionnal reserves means more bitcoins than there are
Naphex: fluffypony: there is a slider down, you squeeze it
fluffypony: Naphex: that graph on the front page, it's not possible to zoom in right? wanted to see if you guys saw a dip from the China thing as well
pankkake: after all, you realize there are now less bitcoins than previously thought
pankkake: I'm surprised things like mtgox bankruptancy were considered "bad" for bitcoin price
Naphex: well, i missed the whole news
MrWDunne: Essentially leaves China to use Cash only, not sure if they will be willing to use that
MrWDunne: Yes, they are banning btc again
Blazedout419: So bored with the China bans already
Naphex: mostly cacheing tuning
Naphex: https://i.imgur.com/CDR0owC.png load times post frontend optimizations :D
fluffypony: I'm just glad I never kept coins on there
fluffypony: he has a point though - if the 200k coins they magically "found" form part of the assets sold off to pay creditors, customers will proportionally get less as they have to share with other creditors
ozbot: Why the SaveGox Plan is Very Important to the Bitcoin Ecosystem | FENTON REPORT
HeySteve: re: <+fluffypony> needless to say, eulethria was pissed
HeySteve: yeah Eleuthria contacted me, glad I was vague and didn't make any accusations of involvement there
bitcoinpete: "Worry about skin in the game, not inequality."
ozbot: Is China Really Prepared to Shift to Market-Driven Interest Rates? | Institutional Investor
random_cat: i think that depends upon where one's nose is
davout: random_cat: wet pussies are the consequence of so much log, not the other way around
random_cat: blame the wet pussies
davout: thestringpuller: reading fine print is a good thing, why not rate it as such? :D
thestringpuller: (trying to estimate shipping for cookies)
gribble: CVO: Summary for Cenveo Inc- Yahoo! Finance: <http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CVO>; Cascades Volcano Observatory: <http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/>; CVO - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CVO>
gribble: Chief visionary officer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_visionary_officer>; Chief executive officer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_executive_officer>; What is CVO (chief visionary officer)? - Definition from WhatIs.com: <http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/CVO>
gribble: Chief visionary officer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_visionary_officer>; What is CVO (chief visionary officer)? - Definition from WhatIs.com: <http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/CVO>; Chief Visionary Officer | The Black Man Can Institute: <http://tbmcinstitute.theblackmancan.org/leadership-team/chief-visionary-officer/>
davout: ;;rate random_cat 1 reads the fine print
davout: random_cat jurov it's fixed, thank you for reporting
bitcoinpete: currencies to make good.
bitcoinpete: levine is also doing this humint.is thing. he's the "cvo"
cazalla: maybe the editor just copy/pasta'd without proofreading
bitcoinpete: cazalla: good question. obviously not very subtly or else tc wouldn't have published and retracted
fluffypony: someone needs to tell MaidSafe and this "Dark Market" crap that they're reinventing the wheel; Tahoe-LAFS over I2P already has a web client and is a distributed data store etc.
bitcoinpete: "The MAIDSAFE project specifically and these types of crowdsales broadly have a great future ahead, but it’s a bit like launching a boat – careful thought, diligent planning and rigorous construction must all come together or the whole thing sinks." <<such derp
cazalla: how'd he sneak that widget in
bitcoinpete: kid is pissing me off pretending he knows shit though, quotes like "Life is about variables, monetary fundamentals is entirely about variables." abound
fluffypony: did they think it defeated journalistic integrity?
bitcoinpete: so ltb head adam levine tried writing about maidsafe for techcrunch and they pulled his article cuz it had a tip widget
fluffypony: needless to say, eulethria was pissed
fluffypony: because obviously all coins just appear out of thin air
fluffypony: without thinking that maybe someone mined some coins in the pool, withdrew them, and then used them
fluffypony: bitcoinpete: yep, but then some bright spark traced some coins back to BTC Guild and accused Eulethria of being complicit
bitcoinpete: fluffypony: and if you go to http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewgpg.php you should be able to just search the page for a key
bitcoinpete: fluffypony: saw that article about the mt gox coins flowing into maidsafe. that thing is more crooked than a chicago politician
fluffypony: can you search the WoT for a specific gpg key id?
HeySteve: they hint it's related to heartbleed, NRPE or Ebury, not that I'd heard of the other 2
fluffypony: BingoBoingo: The entire world is Italy. <- true words
HeySteve: I'm more interested in the malware and where the coins are going, I wonder if they preserved a specimen (sort of thing)
HeySteve: but they've taken action, cleaned it apparently
HeySteve: well I have no idea if they caught this early or late
fluffypony: and you do that by consistently monitoring resource utilisation over time
fluffypony: not entirely, but any sysadmin worth his salt needs to know *when* to scale
HeySteve: call of duty and bong hits? who knows. but would monitoring load prevent this sort of thing occurring in the first place?
fluffypony: that just points to shitty sysadmins; if they're not monitoring load what are they doing?
HeySteve: the web lately, with malware attacks of this nature being reported by customers of AWS and the Iowa State University."
HeySteve: "This week, SingleHop engineers noticed an increase in the number of customers reporting compromised servers. As we investigated these reports, we were able to identify a common malicious software program installed on many of the compromised servers. The malware is specifically designed to siphon the server’s computing power into mining bitcoins. This has been a growing trend throughout
mircea_popescu: well, maybe next time someone starts a uk exchange.
fluffypony: mircea_popescu: the guy that's starting a UK exchange because there "isn't one"
fluffypony: Banka de Fluffy has a certain ring to it
fluffypony: if the Bank of England stands....England stands!
MrWDunne: We have had one bank open in the past 100 years
MrWDunne: fluffypony: In the UK it is almost impossible
bounce was thinking it'd be useful to have a fiat bank connect various exchanges
fluffypony: bounce: licensing is the issue, I think
MrWDunne: Naphex: Once we have the volume we will be doing just that.
bounce wonders how hard it is to set up a bank and have it talk to other banks
MrWDunne: bounce: there isn't one. Not in the UK.
Naphex: MrWDunne: better have that proffesional hired and with an office near ;]
MrWDunne: Bounce: Indeed, the laws allow for no AML. But the bank doesn't
fluffypony: bounce: 100% - I wasn't arguing for or against it, although I do think that the best non-AML route will always be otc/face to face
MrWDunne: Naphex: Better have a professional do it than myself
Naphex: which for a bitcoin exchange, i doubt its going to be enough
bounce: fluffypony: just scanned a bit, but we need less AML, not more. so if the rules allow for this, that's positive.
MrWDunne: I'm responsible for initial setup. That is something I can handle
Naphex: who will mange them full time?
MrWDunne: The data center will monitor the hardware
Naphex: the servers, the colocation, the hosting
MrWDunne: Naphex: No that would be unwise, I will have a professional do that, and learn from him as we go along
Naphex: MrWDunne: are you going to do the tehnical monitoring as well?
MrWDunne: Jurov: unfortunately that is every UK bank. 3% is every bank though. That is the currency conversion discrepancy
MrWDunne: Naphex: This will be my fulltime job
jurov: wut "SEPA incurs a 3% hidden cost + £15"? I wouldn't touch such scumbag banks with dry pole
MrWDunne: Naphex; More details will emerge on that, its a hard one to explain.
Naphex: for something so sensitive, i wouldn't do much trusting. or use developers that are not in-house
MrWDunne: Punkman: two bank accounts known to be for a bitcoin exchange, with the bank explicitly saying that is okay for us to use.
Naphex: outsourced tech is the most problematic imho
Naphex: MrWDunne: who wrote the specs, for the third party to develop?
punkman: so, quotes on costs, outsourced tech, 25 page pdf and listing on Counterparty. What else you got?
MrWDunne: Anyhow, I do now need to go. So please send any questions to me on BitcoinTalk and I'll answer them as soon as
MrWDunne: Of course, as I said don't quote me on C++ I just know its not a PHP trade engine
fluffypony: yeah, and on the topic of reinventing of wheels... https://alphapoint.com seems...interesting if you're going that route
Naphex: but you'll need tons of tools attached especially when you go live
Naphex: so it depends a lot on what the tradeengine is going to do
Naphex: you're gonna need too attach lots of other components, for reporting, monitoring, and keeping track off
Naphex: tbh, i'd be scared of doing that in C++ enterprise wise
fluffypony: (well, an epilogue in that I don't think anything further needs to be written on the matter)
fluffypony: also last thing in terms of reading material is hanbot's glorious epilogue here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=124441.0
MrWDunne: Also the actual business plan is a 25 page PDF, but it has details about an additional project planned to launch in a year. And Naphex: yes we certainly do.
Naphex: do you have a contract with the development team? too keep extending/bugfixing after release?
fluffypony: listing on an "exchange" that anyone can list on with zero due diligence or even an email address verification makes it doubly challenging...I suggest leveraging the -otc WoT and GPG contracts (http://wiki.bitcoin-otc.com/wiki/GPG_Contract) to build trust and tie yourself down to shareholders