log☇︎
708800+ entries in 0.338s
mod6: maybe it was you who posted the /. article lol
mod6: ahh, yeah, heard they were making SSH stand-alone from SSL/TLS
BingoBoingo: mod6: That's when 5.6 comes out with their redone SSL libraries and stuff.
mod6: BingoBoingo: sounds like a good route to go. why november?
BingoBoingo: mod6: It's stuff like this that will probably push me to full time OpenBSD use come November
mod6: 'tis a good question tho BingoBoingo
mod6: do you even unit test bro?
BingoBoingo: I wonder how many of these little things, perfectly amusing in an IRC bot, occured in the goxfail and how many lurk in bitcoind 0.9
mod6: it was time-warp time before because GMT went to 00:00 and the last block was in 22:00, forgot to solve for the 24hour roll-over case.
mod6: let's see how this does.
BingoBoingo: benkay: Yeah, but the brake generally is the thing you more urgently need, and that usually still has a mechanical rather than electronic link
benkay: i mean the engine is computer controlled i assume, implying e-gas.
BingoBoingo: The gas pedal is almost always fly by wire now, but not so with the brake and steering.
benkay: i'm enamored of this 04 civic. everything's manual.
BingoBoingo: Well, there aren't all to many cars that are completely "fly by wire"
benkay: do away with the lie of manual operation in the damn things.
benkay: i've always wanted to wire a ps2 controller into 'automatic' cars.
ozbot: Did the Ignition Key Just Die? - Slashdot
mod6: (17:43) < BitOTTer502> 1 hour 57 minutes and 19 seconds << ok think I have fix now, just testing
ozbot: A Pragmatic Test for Alcoholism | Bingo Blog
BingoBoingo: csshih: Understandable. Just whip them everyday until they ship it.
csshih: BingoBoingo, it's in outbound.. for some reason my employees didn't unlock the door so usps didn't pick up the package
BingoBoingo: csshih: Did that thing get shipped yet?
artifexd: OMG! Time warp attack!
bitcoinpete: to be continued, gents. thx for the… inputs
jurov: that's easy to do but you must consider the keys compromised
artifexd: Note that I'm not saying this is a smart service to use, but its existence is theoretically possible.
artifexd: Imagine a web service where you send it some txids and the necessary private keys along with a destination address. This service, when it gets a few requests, combines all the inputs and sends them to the outputs.
jurov: but if coinjohn is a thing, reusing addy definitely leaks more information about owner
mod6: i'll work on that this week probably.
mod6: at some point, i'll be adding an block average time over a 24 hour interval too.
mod6: BingoBoingo: thx. just saw you were lookin for that one command a few days back. :]
artifexd: Maybe you and I get together and combine our funds to pay a common bill.
jurov: unless some diffie-hellman magic can be applied to creating bitcoin txes
jurov: artifexd: to create the final "spent" tx you need to know both privkeys
artifexd: jurov I disagree with your comment that there is no substantial difference between the two examples you provided. In the first case, there is no certainty whatsoever that the same entity controls the two different utxos. In the second case, it is certain that the same person controls both.
bitcoinpete: does it matter, then, whether addresses are reused or not?
BingoBoingo: mod6: Oh yeah, that's some cool stuff atc bot does now
jurov: to get address' balance one has to traverse whole blockchain and collect its unspent outputs
jurov: address does not have a balance, that is an illusion
jurov: they are unique regardless if they belongs to one address or not
jurov: every output is an input to another transaction and has unique ID
jurov: bitcoin transaction is just set of inputs and outputs
jurov: look onto it this way: forget addresses, they're just a convenience for humans and are not strictly needed in the blockchain
bitcoinpete: mostly as to what you're understanding that mp isn't
bitcoinpete: i'm starting to see what you're saying though
jurov: no, i mean the address you sent these satoshis from in first place
bitcoinpete: the source being the miner?
jurov: and every input will be traceable back to its source
jurov: to spend it, you then have to create tx with million inputs
jurov: if you send 1 satoshi million times onto one address
jurov: these did NOT get "sloshed" together
jurov: 1K4F is named 4 times
bitcoinpete: jurov dignork i think reusing does work, let's look at this address, which may or may not be mp's bitbet address: https://blockchain.info/address/1K4FswVNus5xJZJ6TYqAzWSy3tXBBFdGnM
jurov: and analyze the resulting tx
BingoBoingo: Oh, the local hospital's discharge papers now have all of the lab values.
jurov: just try it yourself, again
jurov: gets sloshed together in a reused address <<FALSE
ozbot: imgur: the simple image sharer
bitcoinpete: that too
bitcoinpete: dignork: the rounder, more even number is usually a bit of a giveaway
dignork: bitcoinpete: but then if vendor only uses one addess it's easily discoverable
dignork: bitcoinpete: in case of "change address" there is a slight advantage: observer does not really knows which one of the destination addresses is change, and which is vendor
bitcoinpete: since everything gets sloshed together in a reused address, the taint is less clearcut, as i understand it
jurov: mike_c i commented on that
bitcoinpete: but i'm more clear than i was a week ago
bitcoinpete: on this topic, i won't pretend that i have it nailed down
Duffer1: how many times can i spell excercize incorrectly in the same sentence
Duffer1: seems like an excercise in discovering how many laws he's breaking in different parts of the world would be an ammusing excercize
jurov: Part 5: Exercise with signing offline wallet, in which Ivan does not understand why the funds were moved right after the signing
jurov: Part 4: In which the requirement to be incorporate and fill 1" thick questionnaire with corporate details comes to light
BingoBoingo: Maybe Havelock had the foresight to give you the anagram representative
jurov: Part 3: In which we seek anyone other than
jurov: Part 1: In which Ivan from Havelock explains they are a platform for funding development of new projects exclusively
BingoBoingo: jurov: That's why you turn it into a serial.
jurov: hehe they did not give me succinct summary like dotcoin did
BingoBoingo: jurov: You just laid out a way to publish the stuff. Each month gets a post, one post per week.
mike_c: jurov, any reason not to release those docs?
Duffer1: i think i just sprained an eyeball rolling them so hard
Duffer1: who could have possibly seen this coming
BingoBoingo: Haven't had a drink in days and no Delerium tremens
BingoBoingo: If there's one thing I've learned from this recent medical chaos it is that I am not an alcoholic
BingoBoingo: jurov: That will be an interesting day
jurov: Guest95361 someday we'll maybe release our logs from coinroll listing negotiations...and there will be lulz
BingoBoingo: Guest95361: Didn't seem so hard for Mussolini or the Kims of Korea
Guest95361: It is rather hard to be an entire nation
BingoBoingo: Probably not Topace
Guest95361: I'm not Mark Karpeles, I'll tell you that much
Guest95361: Very true
Guest95361: Although then again you rely on the fact that I don't use a VPN for that part
Guest95361: Crap, you just narrowed it down to 90% of the UK
BingoBoingo: jurov: BTCENTRALPLUS.COM to be precise
jurov: IP from the UK.. are you Nefario?
BingoBoingo: benkay: Said they know something about havelock, Doesn't seem to be offering anything new.
benkay: Guest95361: you understand why this is a weak play, right?
BingoBoingo: benkay: They are some anon who Pm'd me for !up
Guest95361: One of the more underestimated members of the community
benkay: who is this Guest95361 ?
Guest95361: They are rather good plans, and I know that its not known. Its not my place to say
Naphex: maybe they are terrible plans ;/