log☇︎
66100+ entries in 0.022s
asciilifeform: i thought in ro cosmography england was an uninteresting backwater. or is that only mircea_popescu
asciilifeform: but there at least they dun pretend to have created the airplane.
asciilifeform: there was a '90s american film where there is a scene, where an airplane lands in africa and in fast motion gets stripped for parts, like elephant carcass by hyenas ☟︎
asciilifeform: depressing reading. 'suddenly dud rsa keys, hip!'
asciilifeform: czechs, germans, etc boecks.
asciilifeform: i stopped keeping track in real time.
asciilifeform: veritable feast for the vultures, it's been lately
asciilifeform: ( recall the primalitytest thread )
asciilifeform: sure.
asciilifeform: afaik no published work re known middles
asciilifeform: anyway original observation was re upper and lower cont. strings
asciilifeform: if rsa is strong
asciilifeform: so sheer weight of 1s can't be much use
asciilifeform: 1024 is ten bits of info, readily brutable
asciilifeform: within 1sd or so lel
asciilifeform: gotta be continuous, or i could 'mahaha, i know mircea_popescu's q has 1024 ones!'
asciilifeform: lel
asciilifeform: last link got cut
asciilifeform: sorta lulzy to learn that a day of bulldozering costs moar than a used bulldozer.
asciilifeform: ( a preowned SEM is mebbe 10k )
asciilifeform: supposing i had where to keep one, and weren't gearing up for escape
asciilifeform: re 30k, it's moar than enuff for own motherfucking microscope
asciilifeform: i can't picture it appreciating to the point where i can spare 30k worth of it
asciilifeform: separate item neh
asciilifeform: because the talent pool aint any bigger
asciilifeform: aha and the 40 remaining % gets to charge same or moar
asciilifeform: it's a surgery, d00d strips carefully the layers , takes pics
asciilifeform: no, like appendectomy.
asciilifeform: the microscope per se is 1940s tech.
asciilifeform: so cost dun move much
asciilifeform: it's mostly manual work, mircea_popescu
asciilifeform: in sadder noose, cheapest bolix ivory microscopy quote, chinese, that covers all the layers ( metal and passivation ) is ~30,000 usd. ☟︎
asciilifeform: lol
asciilifeform: betcha it could live for years.
asciilifeform: i'ma half a mind to build that antenna , btw, and see how long before confiscated
asciilifeform: but this is a thread for another time.
asciilifeform: within a given bitness category
asciilifeform: looking for any kind of outliers by any conceivable measure
asciilifeform: reminds me, not long before the beginning of the time of dulap troubles, and the isp winter, asciilifeform was experimenting with statistical tests of the ~moduli~ a la dieharder
asciilifeform: aa
asciilifeform: or mircea_popescu was thinking of the particular one illustrated earlier
asciilifeform: dun need periodicity for rng diddle, necessarily
asciilifeform: the archetypical example is 'digits of pi'
asciilifeform: generally there are cheaper ways to make use of 'key' to chump rng
asciilifeform: ( bottom or top consec. bits )
asciilifeform: iirc most recent black magic gives you polynomialtime breakage if >=.22b of bitness b of p or q bits are known ☟︎
asciilifeform: aha.
asciilifeform: *the already
asciilifeform doesn't expect to see a pill against this, other than he already obvious engineering margin of using respectable number of bits of entropy for whole thing
asciilifeform: otherwise yes
asciilifeform: ok i misread a leading ...
asciilifeform: this is sloppy thinking
asciilifeform: where's the ... in there
asciilifeform: srsly try it
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: nope. carry exists.
asciilifeform: observe, you cannot say anything re p,q from he middle bits of pq (or rsa would be useless) ☟︎
asciilifeform: problem only properly exists in the tail ('youngest') bit, where carry is 0
asciilifeform often says 'eldest' , as in ru
asciilifeform: aite
asciilifeform: let's settle another matter -- which bit is 'first'
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: octets??
asciilifeform: so pegging primes min size does 0.
asciilifeform: the other thing, diana_coman , is that if enemy knows that you will never use a p or q below limit l -- he can start bruting from l
asciilifeform: diana_coman: generally speaking, anything one could conceivably walk over, is unsafe - i.e. primes smaller than the number of femtoseconds in a millenium, if i had to give a heuristic
asciilifeform: understand, setting the top bit won't help you, i can just as easily say 'but what if the middle 2000 bits in my prime end up zeros!'
asciilifeform: in an honest rng
asciilifeform: diana_coman: calculate the probability of fatally small p or q.
asciilifeform: spyked: i use generic, which (quite unlike in cpp) results in a fully static structure that is created at runtime
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737525 << this is therightthing. but note that not only is http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737533 not a problem, but the behaviour is fundamental to ffa. in ada a structure is considered nondynamic if its size doesn't change at run time. not if 'magic number' size, like in overflowlang. ☝︎☝︎
asciilifeform: and diana_coman , there is no 'trouble if one is too small', you throw out ~both~ if the test fails
asciilifeform: imho ^ is The Right Thing, at least for folx who aren't generating keys in a burning hurry
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737528 <<< >>> http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737387 ☝︎☝︎
asciilifeform: i.e. until we have one another's mods ~and~ pubexps! we're not really rsaparties. with all that flows from this.
asciilifeform: i was answering apeloyee's odd 'but i can give you my pubexp later, over unauthenticated plaintext, anywhere' oddity.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: aha!
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737520 << what keeps a million enemies from offering false pubexps in false conversations, preventing us from agreeing on a genuine one ? ☝︎☟︎
asciilifeform: a la microshit.
asciilifeform: BingoBoingo: default firmware is known-boobytrapped ☟︎
asciilifeform: ( it could buy a veeeery small, in a bottle , flotilla... )
asciilifeform: pretty sure i still have a coin i paid 0 for, lel
asciilifeform: ( i could even readily believe that an , e.g., 25x rise in the heathenbux:btc exch rate would make no practical diff to mircea_popescu . but i suspect that i am not the only one here for whom it would make a palpable diff. )
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737451 << i see the q of whether a coin buys a rowboat, a battleship, or entire flotilla, as broadly interesting one -- but mebbe that's just me ☝︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737435 << keep in mind, this was not a high bar -- ru soldiers took home even toilets from germany ☝︎
asciilifeform: http://its.svensson.org/m.f.d.(file) << in evenmoar obscura
asciilifeform: that at least has up-side
asciilifeform somewhat addled with viral fevers, and strange dreams at night ( featuring such colourful characters as tov. ceaușescu )
asciilifeform: yea
asciilifeform: now i recall having argued this myself, lol
asciilifeform: ( 2048 rather. but you get the idea )
asciilifeform: ( there are still fewer primes than 2^4096bit phase space )
asciilifeform: somewhat counterintuitively, you still get same result ( minus the time sidechannel leak, naturally )
asciilifeform: afaik the only remaining, and most obvious 'loss' is the one implicit in prime number theorem ( where , wat, ~10k possible rng outputs correspond to same prime output )
asciilifeform: iirc she is pumping it straight from fg.
asciilifeform: ( she is using my sanitized gpg bignum. but i did not preserve koch's faux-rng atrocity ; so anything pertaining to entropy, is new )
asciilifeform: afaik diana_coman exhaustively showed the places
asciilifeform: honestly labeled box imho suffices.
asciilifeform: at any rate i haven't any argument against http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737376 ☝︎
asciilifeform: 4 all in all
asciilifeform: ( plus the 2 bottoms )
asciilifeform: you lose 1. but in koch's variant you lose 2 .