log☇︎
649100+ entries in 0.397s
mjr_: and there are certain things you CANNOT do anymore which you COULD before
asciilifeform: an improvement, even if genuine, will be condemned to grind out a meagre existence as an altchain.
mircea_popescu: there's an entire class of them, occasionally i bitchslap them into the abyss, but whatever.
mircea_popescu: you can translte the miner';s desire to "runn different code" in the flurry of idiotic "revolutionary" nonsense imbeciles like molecular are pushing on the forum.
mircea_popescu: mjr_ it's not meaningfully different or else it wouldn't be able to run.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform the english language'd have benefited immensely had it been frozen solid when handed off to the nutty colonists cca 1700.
asciilifeform: because the burden of proof on anybody pushing a 'pheature' to demonstrate that he isn't slipping in a semantic - or syntactic - pwnh0le - is just about impossible to meet.
mjr_: i am saying that the code that is running on some mining machines is not the same code that ran in 2011
pete_dushenski: ben_vulpes: thestringpuller: looks like your login succeeded, i have no idea right this moment why the request timed out. <<bring on the muffins!
mircea_popescu: i can refer you to some random bathroom stall ? what of it ?
mjr_: and you can runn a diff on the code if you want
mjr_: i can refer you to the latest release notes if you like
mjr_: perhaps that point was missed...but basically alts are pointless, because bitcoin can adopt anything they can invent IF it is useful enough to be adopted
mircea_popescu: <mjr_> considering the bitcoin standard gets changed around once every 2 months << i have nfi what you're on about, it's noit changed since 2011.
mjr_: there is no need to launch an alt
pete_dushenski: punkman: "This is great transparency, Vitalik. You're setting the right standards" << a shining beacon of derpitude
mjr_: if the idea behind an alt was so good, the market would have selected it to be included in bitcoin already
mjr_: and they have a way of cutting through bullshit, and that was my only point
mjr_: markets are the most efficient way to get to optimum
mircea_popescu: enter about 50 years of sterile "social studies" on the topic of how a bureaucracy is much better.
mjr_: what are the miners running?
mjr_: which is why, IF it needs to change, it will change
xmj: asciilifeform: Thank you for reiterating my point.
asciilifeform: not the phoundation turd
mjr_: he can't change things by fiat, the market rules what he does
xmj: he can want that all day long :)
asciilifeform: that'd be the standard
asciilifeform: bitcoin standard gets changed around once every 2 months << what are the miners running?
mjr_: even though the creator has stated he wants people to move to 3
mjr_: the creator wants them to use python 3
mjr_: and that right now is based on who makes the most convincing argument
mjr_: i don't think we have this calcification that you point to
mjr_: considering the bitcoin standard gets changed around once every 2 months
mjr_: and once people start hurting in the wallet, they move quick
mjr_: so, if things need to change, they change
mjr_: oh...the market responded and they capped themselves at 40
The20YearIRCloud: I want to IPO
mjr_: so when that pool got over 51%
mjr_: either way, people vote with their mining power
xmj: no no, that's altcoind
kakobrekla: o i got this one, its 'doom'
xmj: mjr_: yes, well, what do you think the 'd' in btcd and bitcoind stands for?
asciilifeform: we're re-living history, in a way. the sane folks are ever less likely to 'reopen the btcd standard' with every passing day of derp.
asciilifeform: ace that will allow developers to use this language at all, _nothing_ happens. By mounting a constant attack on the standards process, the nutcases who are never going to be happy with the language, anyway, ensure that their negative attitude keeps everyone else from being happy and becoming happier, too.'
asciilifeform: raid that if they open up for any change at all, the destructive forces will win and the language they love will be destroyed by the hatemongers and destroyers who seek only their own personal revenge over feature wars lost. And that is precisely the case with Common Lisp. Strong negative forces want to reverse several decisions and threaten to destabilize the language, so in order to maintain the necessary pe
asciilifeform: '...people who hate parts of the language, some of the people who created it, or some of the process that created it, who hold personal grudges they cannot let go of, or who think the best way to "improve" the language is to stay in the community and spread negativity and tear down everybody else's enthusiasm, do just that. No improvement at all will take place when such negativity rules because everybody is af
nubbins`: it's all for the prescient
asciilifeform: IF the community who uses bitcoin pretty much unanimously like your idea it would make it into bitcoin << increasingly less likely with every idiot-alt.
pete_dushenski: nubbins`: isn't it all for the children?
mjr_: don't want to get into religion
nubbins`: using bitcoin to help children with type 1 diabetes
assbot: Jerry the Bear Using Bitcoin to Help Children With Type 1 Diabetes Bitcoin Magazine
mjr_: so, the heteroculture of bitcoin can act as a deterrent to any one group being able to dictate
mjr_: bitcoind has to follow
mjr_: if bitcoinj btcd etc decide to do it
mjr_: there are more than 1 implementation
xmj: welcome to #reality, this is not how committees work.
xmj: mjr_: that assumes things get into Bitcoin on a Meritocratic base.
mircea_popescu: somehow ever since good old productive labour became something for niggers and mexicans, the ontological hope of all usians is inextricably tied to "ideas" and "Creativity" and "being famous" etc.
mjr_: if your motives were pure, you wouldn't need to launch an alt
mjr_: IF the idea was good, you wouldn't need to launch an alt
xmj: LitecoinSchadenf: I've seen it Time and Time again.
mjr_: so the only rationale is that "the idea isn't good", or "i don't want to give away the idea without scamming people for money and boosting my ego"
mircea_popescu: mjr_ there's very little ideas to be had and very many people who like to tell themselves htey have ideas.
xmj: LitecoinSchadenf: they'll predictably bash ANY non-gold{,silver} currency.
mircea_popescu: godovo beats me. look through the logs, it's all there.
mjr_: but you wouldn't be able to boost your ego, or scam people into paying you
godovo: mircea_popescu: what's there to talk about then?
mjr_: what i meant is that IF the community who uses bitcoin pretty much unanimously like your idea
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform yeah well that's not really what a good idea is now is it.
godovo: mircea_popescu: I bet they want "guarantees" or escrow
asciilifeform: good for the scammer.
asciilifeform: see 'demurrage' and the like
mircea_popescu: godovo buncha people want to talk about it.
mjr_: i want to either get puts, sell futures, or borrow and sell
asciilifeform: mjr_: '... your idea is good, it will prob be added into bitcoin' << there is a set of ideas that are only 'good', from the point of view of their proponents, if other people are (made to) use them.
mircea_popescu: but inasmuch as the market for them is exactly 0... there's no way to short. nor do they have any \value
godovo: mircea_popescu: btw, any takers on the eth "deal"?
mjr_: nubbins`: thanks for the tip
mircea_popescu: otherwise one could short them either as futures (like i am trying to shoirt eth/doge)
mjr_: ah, P.T. Barnum said that a sucker is born every minute
mircea_popescu: you can' tshort them because there is nobody buying them lol/
nubbins`: mjr_, try using bitbet :D
mjr_: You can't short the alts, because there is no trustworthy lender, because they are all scams...
mjr_: mircea_popescu: I meant you can short almost all stocks today, you couldn't in the 90's tech bubble.
pete_dushenski: godovo: afaik it was useful, if not profitable, the former quality being a first in the history of altcoins
mircea_popescu: no you can't. im talking of the hyip crap. where do you think all these forum-ceos are coming from ?
mjr_: mircea_popescu: but you can short some of those...nowadays it is a lot easier to short, and easy to borrow stock in order to do so
pete_dushenski: BingoBoingo: there's a point
asciilifeform loves the presumed-winblows that always pops up in random n0obs' comments
mircea_popescu: point in case, the eth launch
mircea_popescu: mjr_ nah that's not it at all. it's much more like the online scam "industry", ie, 90% of volume is self-trading.
mjr_: personally, i think that if it were about "your idea" and "your idea" had value, it would be incorporated into bitcoin...
gribble: Introducing F.DERP pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.: <http://trilema.com/2014/introducing-fderp/>; Further derps - Trilema: <http://trilema.com/2014/further-derps-dbstp-dcbse-dcifi-dokco-dxapo/>; F.DERP pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.: <http://trilema.com/category/fderp/>
pete_dushenski: can't remember the name now
pete_dushenski: asciilifeform: there was that one that tested out how btc would behave when all new coins were mined.
asciilifeform still waiting for an alt that isn't an obvious premine scam
mjr_: ok, i reread the FAQ, where are DERPS explained (i get it obviously, its stupid businesses, hence the name DERP)
LitecoinSchadenf: what's your issue with the MIses Circle/Nakamoto Institute?
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: I believe The20YearIRCloud called you old