642400+ entries in 0.409s
gribble: Error: Something in
there wasn't a valid number.
jurov: thestringpuller: how am i supposed
to multiply what?
assbot: X.IDIFF.JUN has settled. pe
Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
jurov: apparently mircea moved
the decimal dot
jurov: which is more
than 2.38446700388033E10
BingoBoingo: ThickAsThieves: Well, I was referring
to your last prediction, but... I've blogged wrond bitbet predictions...
ThickAsThieves: BingoBoingo I haven't really worked on charting
that high much, it's just one possibility
assbot: Shit /r/Bitcoin says (shit_rbtc_says) auf
Twitter
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [PETA] [PAID] 10.90188624 BTC
to 1`149`988 shares, 948 satoshi per share
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B.MINE] [PAID] 1.58080095 BTC
to 14`991 shares, 10545 satoshi per share
assbot: War of Life - Cellular automata
to
the death!
mike_c: market is uncertain about swol. which seems appropriate
to me.
mike_c: even lower. last
time mpoe was
this low btc was 80
mike_c: this could be your revenge for
the dec. diff bet :)
mike_c: you drop a pile of btc on
that and you will get action.
assbot: BitBet - Bitcoin
to drop under $400 before October :: 1.12 B (24%) on Yes, 3.59 B (76%) on No | closing in 1 month 2 days | weight: 95`935 (100`000
to 1)
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 518.65, Best ask: 519.99, Bid-ask spread: 1.34000, Last
trade: 520.0, 24 hour volume: 15220.06221684, 24 hour low: 500.01, 24 hour high: 530.0, 24 hour vwap: 515.638702827
mike_c: ThickAsThieves: 266? crazy
talk.
ben_vulpes: ;;later
tell pete_dushenski gotta play
the game
to win.
[]bot: Bet placed: 1.99981424 BTC for Yes on "BTC Difficulty over 31Bn before October"
http://bitbet.us/bet/1028/ Odds: 79(Y):21(N) by coin, 79(Y):21(N) by weight.
Total bet: 29.48701626 BTC. Current weight: 94,953.
assbot: Ramez Naam - Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia
assbot: NSA Agents Leak
Tor Bugs
To Developers - Slashdot
mike_c: yes, i remember. hm. i am now envisioning a page
that lists desired features with a
tip jar and people can pay for shit
they want done.
mike_c: complaining about free
tools is classy.
mike_c: thestringpuller: yeah, i was complaining
that
the actual
tweet is mentioned in channel, but
the actual log line is not.
usagi: Only a matter of
time before someone applied
the lessons of HFT
to bitcoin.
mike_c: oh, or assbot could just recognize
the link
to log and use
the hashtag.
mike_c: i guess
the way
to do it would be
to use query parameters instead of hash
tags..
mike_c: and as an aside, it is embarrassing for
this channel
that
tweets are scraped and repeated from links but not references
to
the log!
mike_c: +1, i was surprised
to see
the addition.
usagi: You would
think
they could just pay it out of profits, at least
that
usagi: And
they still managed
to screw it up.. unbelievable
usagi: Its
the one
thing I never really understood about mtgox..
they were making hundreds of million a year
usagi: A popular exchange makes so much money I have no idea why
they would go fractoinal reserve, it just adds risk
usagi: "Proof-of-reserves for digital currency exchanges has been a sensitive issue in
the community since
the collapse of Mt Gox in February."
usagi: thanks but
the kids are home, bbl
usagi: I say let em do whatever
they want
usagi: Women having
the right
to go on
the pill and become self employed, ahem, is a great
thing. Really.
usagi: I sort of agree, but I am not sure I would want
to go back
to society
the way it was 100 years ago either
usagi: The fact
that
this is never mentioned nor explored is more a
testament
to
the reason why women generally didn't have any rights in
the first place
than anything else
chetty: yup
thats why I say
the whole rights
thing is stupid, and femnazi even more so
usagi: But
this would require some amount of money (which it is obvious
the women being denied credit -- for example -- did not have)
usagi: And
they could have done anything
they wanted in
the name of
their corporation.
usagi: A lot of
this is really beside
the point. We're ignoring
the fact
that women could have incorporated a company with a willing lawyer
usagi: She probably made more
than most working men
usagi: Women had it pretty good back
then. IMO of course.
usagi: Who in
their right minds would have issued
them credit?
usagi: When asked how
they planned
to repay
their loan, what do you
think
they would have said?
usagi: I have a pretty good feeling
that
the general case of women being denied is because
they would present a credit risk
usagi: There's
too much evidence
that wasn't
the case
usagi: Perhaps
those in charge of
the issuance of credit simply knew ahead of
time what would happen once
they started giving married women credit cards?
chetty: this history of all
this stuff is still
there, it just gets left out of
the 'common' versions
usagi: The other factor is
that humans have a very long written history.
chetty: much like blacks get left out of
the american revolution ...
chetty: no, I mean
the list you are reading is
the
thing rewriten
usagi: That's a little
too convenient, comaining
that history has been rewritten
usagi: In 1783
they had a female president.
chetty: muddy
the waters nicely
chetty: rewriting history is a popular occupation
these days
usagi: One list says women couldn't study at institutions like harvard and yale until
the 70s
usagi: I've been
taking a look at a few internet lists of
things women couldn't do in year x, y or z..
there is a lot of bs
chetty: maybe
that was before
they got so greedy
usagi: If I can sell eggs
to a woman,
take her money
to cut her hair,
take her bank deposit, why wouldn't I want
to loan her money?
usagi: Credit card companies are private corporations. Why would
they refuse
to issue an unmarried woman a credit card?
chetty: there were a lot of inequities, but I still hate femnazi as practiced
today
chetty: maybe UK was different, was certainly
true in US
usagi: Dunno, I'm sure
there was prejudice, but as
they say, capital has a will of it's own, banks wouldn't refuse someone who had stable income
usagi: So when Fanny Hopkins was
the bank manager of London & County Bank
chetty: yes she did, and if not husband
then father
usagi: If she could prove income she certainly would not need her working husband
to cosign
usagi: A bank would normally refuse a woman a credit card for example, because it was so unlikely for her
to be able
to pay it back
assbot: Women's suffrage in Switzerland - Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia
xmj: the last canton in switzerland was forced
to introduce unversal suffrage/female voting rights in 1990.
usagi: Meh
that's bs..
there's a lot of bs floating around about womens rightgs
chetty: before
the 60s a woman couldnt even have her own credit, married or not
usagi: Where I work every year someone quits because
they're having a child, and
they never come back
usagi: another massive waste of
time and resources
usagi: Women who stop working because
they're having children don't usually go back
to work
usagi: And
then you have
the issue of maternity leave
usagi: That's also why you are seeing lower wages. People don't NEED as much money
to live anymore, since
there are many more single people
pankkake: but
the cause isn't women's rights,
the cause is
taxes
usagi: it really damaged
the family unit and
the moral fiber of america
usagi: By creating competition in
the workforce between men and women,
the middle class family unit (what you might
think of as
the backbone of
the american workforce) was deemed uneconomical. Now you have
to have
two working parents
to survive
pankkake: there's an interesting pattern
though. Germany allows women
to vote, Hitler gets elected
chetty: usagi, no,
this whole notion of rights, its not specific
to women
usagi: chetty; Womens rights as we know
them
today destroyed american society