log☇︎
625400+ entries in 0.405s
asciilifeform: but can't use an actual analogue circuit, because the output is non-deterministic or because noise ends up multiplicative due to the nature of the ops
asciilifeform: where we're really trying to simulate an analogue computer, for some gnarly physical model
asciilifeform: why do we have floating point hardware instead of rational arithmetic towers? largely, because of code like this:
decimation: in practice the design space is restricted, just like all phones are iphones now
decimation: in theory silicon could be masked into any arbitrary design
mircea_popescu: back then people hadn't figured what the pc is, so they just bolted some capitalistic crap to the sides
decimation: yeah there's no reason why the cpu shouldn't support arbitrary precision arithmetic, even if it takes a lower-level state machine to emulate
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: the extreme computational poverty of the 20th c.
decimation: mircea_popescu: the bane of numerical analysis students?
decimation: I see how one would want a 'habitable' lower-level simulation language to accomplish this work
asciilifeform: or, for that matter, i cannot establish, for anywhere short of several $billion, an actual electric circuit from here to buenos aires
decimation: in which case each type combination would need its own machinery, or at least some method to convert between types
asciilifeform: 'where possible' is answer to decimation's pointing out that you cannot, say, carry out multiplication on integers and 'ieee'-style floats on the same physical circuit with any degree of efficiency.
mircea_popescu: i didn't like the "were possible" part. either always, in which case it's a calculator, or forget it.
asciilifeform: and then you say 'british admiralty's logarithmic human calculators were merely emulating this here computer, on account of lacking one'
mircea_popescu: maybe this is merely semanticism
asciilifeform: sometimes, the simulation turns out to be a superior 'reality' and you throw the old 'reality' out.
asciilifeform: but instead an entity which simulates the behaviour of one where possible (in much the same way a tcp/ip telephone attempts to behave like a traditional electric telephone.)
asciilifeform: wasn't talking about a hand-wired physical circuit
asciilifeform: decimation: if the order predicate is non-inferrable, it is given.
decimation: how do you re-use the quicksort for floats?
asciilifeform: decimation: handle them where?
decimation: asciilifeform: I agree that would be a great goal, but how do you handle types?
mircea_popescu: maybe we make one sometime just for this reason.
mircea_popescu: and i want to accomplish this by replacing quicksort.package with bubblesort.package
mircea_popescu: however, that's not the point. suppose i want my machine to always use bubblesort. everywhere
asciilifeform: on a proper computer, e.g., 'quicksort' or 'newton-raphson method' are distinct entities. and there are no 'programs' as such, only a graph of circuit linkages.
decimation: mircea_popescu: the kernel kinda works that way
asciilifeform: see, precisely my point - i say 'airplane' and -everybody- assumes i mean 'gadget that flies 2 metres above ground for ten minutes if wind is blowing east'
asciilifeform: i don't mean a specially-instrumented crippled proggy running for the occasion
mircea_popescu: well top sorta-does that.
asciilifeform: this is how we got these things that we call 'computer' even though i can't flip a switch that stops all cpus and shows me all the places 'quicksort' is mentioned on the machine and which ones got invoked in the last 7 days.
mircea_popescu: that may explain how we ended up with the current usg.
asciilifeform: then, for one reason or another (monkey overruns man's city; or, more commonly, man begins to turn monkey-like in his haste and sloth and adopts monkey's approach to design) and the fair-weather airplane becomes the only kind extant.
asciilifeform: sometimes this situation evolves in interesting directions. e.g., monkeys steal a small subset of man's tech, and build a cargo-cultish airplane - but one which sorta flies when the weather is just so.
mircea_popescu: if it's voluntary, if the prickly is passive, then the other party is active, and to the active goes the agency.
mircea_popescu: maybe wrongly, but the term to me suggested involuntary and incontinence. which is what the entire observation was based on, after all :
mircea_popescu: but that is a much more self aware, and effectually applied, violence than mere prickliness.
asciilifeform: naggum wrote that the worst thing that could possibly happen to common lisp is if it became 'mainstream' and popular.
asciilifeform: not everyone is itching to be part of some gigantic 'everyone' who will 'do things their way'
asciilifeform: it comes mainly from not wishing to dissolve in the sea.
asciilifeform: this relates directly to certain circles seen as 'prickly'
mircea_popescu: i would suggest the volume in and of itself is proof they say nothing.
decimation: moriarty earlier said that such an attitude is 'simplistic' - after all, how can these people (economists, programmers, students) have so many papers and have said nothing?
mircea_popescu: amusingly enough, for the capacities of the basic rational agent, they'd seem to have a point, too!
mircea_popescu: proponents of such tailored "knowledge" will understandably fight tooth and nail with some classes of rational approach, such as the people who use the counterexample effectually (aka, trolls)
mircea_popescu: fraud through and through, and yet.
mircea_popescu: decimation it's worse than that! consider : you could pick arbitrary assumptions and arbitrary data sets so as to theoretically and practically justify a particular theory sufficiently so that it gives the desired results for a FINITE time interval, calculated to exceed the probable testing period.
decimation: re: model being horeshit: "Because, we know that with theoretical cherry picking someone can come up with a set of assumptions that produces a result that may logically follow from those assumptions, but if the assumptions really don't have much traction in the real world, that result really doesn't have much to say about what we are actually looking at. " << from my econtalk link above
mircea_popescu: hence boundless ignorance ? that ignorance ignorant even of bounds ?
ben_vulpes: whoa abcl runs on the jvm
asciilifeform: hermit in taiga :
decimation: the next step is to become a hermit in the taiga I guess
asciilifeform: they are 'prickly' in the sense that their only contact with a world outside their own is redditards knocking on the door to 'teach how the world is'
mircea_popescu: you can't become prickly just because people are idiots. it's giving idiots too much say.
ben_vulpes is a monkey with tools beyond his sophisticaiton
mircea_popescu: nonsense, that. equally nonsense in both cases.
mircea_popescu: me splitting with everyone's cash because some redditard says things ?
mircea_popescu: but what would be the equivalent to "lisp people being prickly" in context ?
asciilifeform: the most unbearable itch, to monkey, is the mental hole in his picture of the world, the annoying hatefact that rubs his nose in the entire model being horseshit.
mircea_popescu: nevertheless the world and his like have no common points.
mircea_popescu: important to remember that his declarative statements are powerless to influence reality, and as much as he'd like to live in a world where there's no incentive for me to stay honest,
mircea_popescu: this should make it obvious. of course redditard monkey would love nothing more than for his idiocy to be confirmed.
mircea_popescu: "The site is owned by the most annoying, donkey riding arsehole involved with bitcoin." "Unlike all the others, owned by nice people that ran off with your coins." "I wish that arsehole would run off with all the coins if it meant never hearing from him again."
asciilifeform: walls tall enough that the monkeys don't even know, normally, that there is a something behind them, or walls at all.
asciilifeform: in this case - walls.
asciilifeform: if surrounded by monkeys, and for one reason or another can't call an exterminator - what to do.
mircea_popescu: and if you conform by doing the "since they call me a thief anyway might as well", you are actually giving away that much power.
mircea_popescu: this is what i meant, obliquely. if you allow the "community" of screaming monkeys to decide whether you are antisocial type 1 or 2, you're giving them too much power.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: 'antisocial' in this case is same kind of 'antisocial' as, e.g., mathematicians who won't ask to learn from redditors how to do topology 'correctly according to the kommyoonity!'
mircea_popescu: i can't read locklin without him annoying me. such a total schmoozeball.
mircea_popescu: everything that passport.net did or w/e that crap was called
decimation: no dude node.js is going to change everything
bounce: saves going door to door
mircea_popescu: i choose not to witness.
ben_vulpes: also infected with "niceness" - don't talk shit on js! it's not nice!
ben_vulpes: witness the insane popularity of v8 - js on the server!
ben_vulpes: programmers are the herdiest of creatures
mircea_popescu: if your highschool peers can make you antisocial by claiming you're antisocial then there's no incentive for them to abstain is there.
mircea_popescu: "But part of it definitely stems from the incessant stream of ignorant criticisms leveled at the Lisp community by outsiders" asciilifeform it occurs to me that if the outsiders can do that then the whole ecosystem empowers outsiders to an outrageous, unwarranted and quite dangerous degree.
mircea_popescu: is this true even ?
mircea_popescu: "one of the great strengths of the APL ecosystem so far are the user community. Lispy people are a preposterously pricklish and unhelpful bunch in comparison."
mircea_popescu: trilema is really non-js friendly so i guess it prolly has more nonjs readers than average interwebs
mircea_popescu: well i guess if they have silent (non js, non url-forwarding etc) browsers it could be from anywhere
decimation: interesting. So that means people are visiting from bookmarks/rss/etc?
mircea_popescu: they're not redirects. in fact, linked traffic has always been 10% or less, as far as trilema is concerned.
decimation: huh. do the redirects come from particular domains?
mircea_popescu: seriously, 20% of my search traffic came looking for... "true" ? what the fucking hell of a cosmic joke is this.
moriarty: afk folks, enjoy the weekend
decimation: from military service, and free land to farmers. By the end of 1767, German settlers from central Germany had established more than 100 colonies along the Volga River, near Saratov, Russia."
decimation: "The Germans from Russia are descendents of Germans who settled in Russia in the years about 1763 to 1862. Their story begins with Tsarina Catherine II (Catherine the Great) who was empress of Russia, but a German princess by birth. In July 1763 she issued a manifesto to attract people from Western Europe to settle in Russia. The manifesto promised new settlers freedom of religion, freedom from taxes for a 5-30 year period, freedom
mircea_popescu: sooo... yesterday was trilema's largest reading day. yet nothing happened. 90%+ of it direct, too. wtf.
decimation: the mass rabble in the us will have no stomach for intervening in the ukraine
moriarty: anyway one of the nice perks of the war is that, Ukrainian beauties now come cheap
mircea_popescu: it's what makes the joke good
decimation: Odessa used to have a very large german population until Stalin
decimation: I see it in the cards
mircea_popescu: "let's save the environment by shipping natural gas across the atlantic because we're too bigmouthed to fit a cock"
bounce: so, us gas aid for ukraine then?
decimation: no one is going to go without gas or whatever