log☇︎
614100+ entries in 0.464s
mircea_popescu: except information wants to be free and all that.
dionyziz: We're not trying to solve every problem.
mircea_popescu: dionyziz for that much your idea would work fine
dionyziz: We're not trying to solve this problem.
dionyziz: But solving the shipping problem is currently out of the scope of OpenBazaar.
mircea_popescu: and in being controlling, it'll control. which means it'll shape the marketplace.
mircea_popescu: brianhoffman well sure, but it doesn't so much matter if it's a meatspace issue or not. what matters is that it's the controlling issue
bounce: not all trades involve items shipped, and where they do the users of any system, decentralised or not, basically have to provide their own safety. cut-outs and that sort of thing. it does put a bit of a damper as to what is reasonable to advertise.
mircea_popescu: dionyziz b ecause you're leaking information through the shipping. think of it in crypto terms, you're using a 8 bit key on an amiga as part of the process.
brianhoffman: my argument is that this is a meatspace issue
dionyziz: I do not see why this is a necessity.
brianhoffman: well i think that mirrors real life rather well. as your “image” becomes larger your activity becomes less indistinguishable from others.
mircea_popescu: at which point you either go to jail or backstab your users
mircea_popescu: well, for as long as you're small nobody cares that you're moving contraband back and forth, because it's not meaningfully discernible from the general noise of the system
mircea_popescu: i think you maybe misunderstand how safety is effectually implemented.
brianhoffman: and those engaging in privacy conscious behavior will know to protect as best they can out of band from OpenBazaar
brianhoffman: you do realize that a large percentage of items shipped are most likely illicit. this does not stop it from occurring.
mircea_popescu: and since you can't really tell people what to do, you will end up in that conflict whether you want to or not.
mircea_popescu: i gather. but the thing is, that challenge will unravel whatever model you may build.
brianhoffman: but i don’t believe we’re proposing a solution here at the moment for that challenge
brianhoffman: i don’t think that is really in scope for OpenBazaar
brianhoffman: well i guess my response at least initially would be are we really trying to solve that issue here...
mircea_popescu: quite that, yes.
brianhoffman: are you implying that the anonymity is simply thrown out the window once you begin shipping purchased items? i’m feeling dense here.
mircea_popescu: dionyziz are you familiar with the discussion of multicentrality vs decentralisation ?
mircea_popescu: brianhoffman your proposition is to somehow weld them together, but because you can not practically remove the problem of 1, it'll still revert to something similar, inevitably.
dionyziz: This is the main reason we think bitcoin-otc wot is inadequate.
punkman: that's when I ask you to GPG sign something
mircea_popescu: brianhoffman no, it's not. looky here, let's model it. there are 3 items of interest. 1. the shipping of purchased items ; 2. the discussion of trade, ie, merchant and buyer meeting hteir minds ; 3. the payment for purchases. now, these 3 can be sorted in any which way. otc for instance sorts it that 2 is gpg over email or an irc channel, 1 is mail and 3 is the wot.
dionyziz: In OpenBazaar, our threat model requires no centralization, so we want users to be able to validate trust directly.
brianhoffman: I think I see what you’re saying in regards to reimplementing gpg. This is a valid point.
dionyziz: Some of these ideas are detailed in my paper, but keep in mind that my paper is incomplete and just lays out some of our thoughts. We are improving on it and thinking about additional things.
mircea_popescu: im just trying to grok .
mircea_popescu: but anyway! thanks, and dun worry about it, you're not being griled in the sense of having been a bad boy
dionyziz: You as in, people in this channel who have worked on this.
dionyziz: And it's an important asset for the bitcoin community.
mircea_popescu: you know i've done nothing much re bitcoin otc. it's mostly nanotube's thing.
dionyziz: As for your question regarding improvements over your bitcoin-otc wot work, I'd like to first say that we appreciate the work you've done.
mircea_popescu: well that was @ brianhoffman. you, i asked how you aim to improve the wot as it is
dionyziz: Regarding your comments on shipping, this is a different issue which we also have concerns about.
mircea_popescu: so, how do you aim to improve on this ?
mircea_popescu: dionyziz that is rather basic, but anyway, much better than nothing at all.
mircea_popescu: brianhoffman let me restate it. since shipping precludes practical anonimity, it makes sense to bundle the trust required to maintain pseudonymous identities with the trust required to police transactions, resulting in the following cutting of your mayo : centralized trade with decentralized comm network. which reduces your idea to reimplementing gpg over email.
dionyziz: mircea_popescu: Yes, I have sent and received some ratings and used this system to exachange bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: dionyziz the first.
brianhoffman: the issue of shipping ties in nicely with the discussion about arbitration and third-parties in trade transactions
dionyziz: mircea_popescu: Are you talking about the bitcoin-otc wot, the gpg wot, the freenet wot, which one exatly?
mircea_popescu: devil goat ? which is that one ?
brianhoffman: I’m working through your devil goat entry
mircea_popescu: dionyziz well not so much on your ideas whatever they may be, but moreover, how familiar are you with the wot as it works and is implemented currently ?
dionyziz: If you think what we're trying to do is impossible or impractical, this is very important to us and we want to know why.
brianhoffman: mircea_popescu did you see dionyziz’ paper that we have up online? i posted the link earlier
dionyziz: I'm very interested in hearing them, especially if you disagree with our proposals.
dionyziz: I heard you guys have some thoughts on our web-of-trust ideas.
brianhoffman: and also I am not the guitarist for Deicide lol
assbot: Logged on 06-10-2014 16:47:26; mircea_popescu: "OpenBazaar is an open source project to create a decentralized network for commerce online—using Bitcoin—that has no fees and cannot be censored."
brianhoffman: ok i think i found it
mircea_popescu: cuz i was talking @you after you apparently left.
mircea_popescu: didja see thge logs ?
brianhoffman: ok I’ve got @dionyziz here and I think he may have some questions for you all
assbot: Ex-Post: Toronto Bitcoin Expo | Contravex: A blog by Pete Dushenski
pete_dushenski: and he was even "distinctive" enough to pass out cold at a conference dinner while being referenced by the speaker on stage. see: http://contravex.com/2014/04/16/ex-post-toronto-bitcoin-expo/
pete_dushenski: personal friend of bitstein's too afaik
thickasthieves: i thought all things distinctive were crimes?!
mircea_popescu: well that's no crime yet.
thickasthieves: or maybe he's always that way
thickasthieves: there's this interview with him and hearn where he's just gushing
mircea_popescu: i dunno wtf this was.
thickasthieves: is that the bowtie guy
pete_dushenski: mircea_popescu: i don't recall, do we like j tucker ? << o mr. sleepyhead? there's definitely worse muppets out on the "conference" scene.
pete_dushenski: https://twitter.com/KonradSGraf/status/518879632473726976 << just to bug ben_vulpes
mircea_popescu: !up Terra123
pete_dushenski: mebbe ima take a video of a nekkid chick takin a picture of it then approve that
thickasthieves: approve a picture of the comment, kill two birds
pete_dushenski: so good i'm tempted to approve the comment
pete_dushenski: video or a pic or two to get people excited about what you've written. In my opinion, it would make your website a little bit more interesting." << lol these sp4mmers
pete_dushenski: "Everything published was very logical. But, consider this, what if you were to create a awesome title? I ain't suggesting your content is not good., however suppose you added something that makes people want more? I mean IRC Yeshiva | Contravex: A blog by Pete Dushenski is a little plain. You could glance at Yahoo's front page and see how they create news titles to grab viewers to open the links. You might add a
assbot: Investor Tim Draper Leads SnapCard's $1.5 Million Seed Round
kakobrekla: so even if you unrate/negrate you can not down that person, not cause of cache but cause they self upped
assbot: Logged on 06-10-2014 03:17:27; ben_vulpes: kakobrekla: can we do something about this rating lag?
kakobrekla: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=06-10-2014#860305 < several problems with that, id fix if there would be a good solution. problem 1: !down would depend on gribbles presence, now it does not since down does not check wot but if a person self upped or not. problem 2: afaik even wot api is cached ☝︎
mircea_popescu: then you declare you're innocent, a week later they let you go because it was a mistake and there you go, two extra points. maybe three.
mircea_popescu: indiancandy1 it's simple, have some people friendly in the press over at your hotel, have a policeman come and arrest you and confiscate a huge bundle of flour.
mircea_popescu: nah sex tape wrong move for her.
thickasthieves: sex tape
mircea_popescu: yeah looks like they want to set you up for a heel role.
indiancandy1: no not really camera only ffocused on negative things
mircea_popescu: lol and fakekissing the guy ? ok, this was entertaining
mircea_popescu: tsk, pushing up your tits and being all bashful about your hip tattoo ?
bounce: senile tremor on the enter key?
mircea_popescu: hm. never been there.
indiancandy1: at the moment in up
mircea_popescu: (reason being that they proly learned english from 70yo little old ladies)
mircea_popescu: btw, dun call people dear in english. it's this 70 year old grandma thing to do, and for some reason all indian camgirls do it.
indiancandy1: goin on a city tour
indiancandy1: long time
bounce: what a cute photo. until you realise how it was probably taken.
pete_dushenski: Vexual: this ones a newspaper, blogs are for little girls << orly?
mircea_popescu: there's a coupla death metal bass players, brothers, by that name
thickasthieves: would it be absurd for me to suggest that bitcoin volatility has a base shape, which appears as fractals and distorts according to current trend? sorta like an elliot wave or bubble pattern? something like the shape of the algorithm as averaged by combinining all trade bots and human behavior?