log☇︎
566000+ entries in 0.38s
mod6: And perhaps could squash that bug at the same time. I need to do more work with gdb while it's sync'ing up to try to get a more accurate picture.
mod6: I just have a gut-feeling that perhaps as discussed in here before some of these leak problems stem from BOOST, which will be a pita to remove, but a requirement.
mod6: But yeah, it's still has some leaks in there somewhere, as the R.I. died at least 2 different times from 1->current block, but no more than 3 times. Eitherway, this needs to get resolved. But at least we're headed in the right direction. ☟︎
mod6: here's a snippit of what my 300Gb disk looked like with only the dbenv.set_lk_max_locks looked like:
mod6: So I looked into what they have set up in v0.9 and it more closely resembles that second dpaste above. If you guys would like to review a bit before I post these to the list, that'd be awesome.
mod6: I was able to get upto the current block 2 different times with patches 1->5 (which includes ascii's patches, ben's patch, and my removal of checkpoints) with two seperate bdb configs. The first one just changed this: dbenv.set_lk_max_locks(40000); But ended up with a huge amount of BDB tx log files.
kakobrekla: idk if 'wont wedge' is enough for ascii at this point, but gj!
mod6: This month I've been doing testing with the patched version of the reference implementation. Main object here is to get from genesis block to current block, while being able to get past the wedge block 252450. I was able to do that, but not only did we test with ascii's patches and ben's UPNP patch, I added a patch (http://dpaste.com/1G3XY64) that removes the checkpoints, and a patch (http://dpaste.com/1K5M2TN) to configure BDB so the R.I. won't
danielpbarron: i guess it depends on what the marriage contract says
keystroke: ahh ok well marriage itself is a bigger scam than polyamory in that case
keystroke: i thought it was a ponzi
danielpbarron: the male should already have been free to "roam"
keystroke: but the male in a polyamorous relationship can be free to roam as well
danielpbarron: a scam to get males to submit to females
assbot: Logged on 30-01-2014 20:07:31; pankkake: http://devotionalsex.com/ totally not a cult
keystroke: anyway apologies for interrupting the conversation which i can only hope was about orgies
ben_vulpes: if it's tasty
keystroke: why marry them?
keystroke: although i would lean towards polyamory
keystroke: polygamy is to be encouraged
jurov: good for you, no prob with polygamy then
ben_vulpes: i take a profiterole view on identity.
keystroke: i do not think it is epiphenomenal, it is clearly causal
keystroke: i take a parfitian view on personal identity
jurov: nah that's just epiphenomena
keystroke: ah we can discuss the epistemology of personal identity
keystroke: i decided to hang out in this chan for good irc times after reading contravex
keystroke: me too! dcc me some sometime
keystroke: i was just thinking about that
fluffypony: I have a ton of cool photos from that adventure
danielpbarron: Soloman's error was that his wives were not believers, and they led him to worship false idols
keystroke: you peter and i climbed around risto's castle more than a few months back now
keystroke: hey fluffypony, didn't think i would see you here :)
fluffypony: well I don't want to get into a protracted debate...but beyond Solomon that's not true
danielpbarron: fluffypony, nearly all the prominant male figures throughout the Bible had harems of wives and slave wives, and God never scolded them for it
fluffypony: danielpbarron: so then show me the contrast - where in the Bible does it explicitly allow polygamy?
danielpbarron: that passage is about how a husband owns his wife and a wife owns her husband, and that neither may refuse sex
mike_c: oh hey, yeah, plus nobody gives a shit about that old scam.
danielpbarron: yes, but where in any of that does it say "and have no more than one wife"
fluffypony: the Bible also states that any married man in the congregation who is given special responsibilities must be "a husband of one wife."—1 Timothy 3:2, 12
fluffypony: the Apostle Paul (one of Jesus' disciples) was later inspired by God to write: "Let each man have his own wife and each woman have her own husband." (in 1 Corinthians 7:2)
fluffypony: also when asked about marriage, Jesus said: "He who created them from the beginning made them male and female and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and his mother and will stick to his wife, and the two will be one flesh.'"—Matthew 19:4, 5
jurov: bah, this won't go anywhere anyway
jurov: danielpbarron: he expressly mentions he gave them certain laws previously because their hearts were hard...
fluffypony: so for a time, God did permit a man to have more than one wife. (see, for eg. Genesis 4:19; 16:1-4; 29:18-30:24) - but God did not originate the practice of polygamy. He provided only one wife for Adam.
danielpbarron: fluffypony, show me the scripture that says it isn't allowed
ben_vulpes: oh god not with the sky fairies again
fluffypony: but not in the "new testament"
danielpbarron: jurov, Jesus is the God of the old testement, the same God that gave the law to Moses
ben_vulpes: <BingoBoingo> RagnarDanneskjol: Nice site http://thelogdailyreport.com/ << who is this?
fluffypony: polygamy was allowed for a time
fluffypony: [21:42:07] <+danielpbarron>it doesn't condemn having multiple wives either <- that's not true
jurov: so jesus inspired paul to condemn homosexuality despite he did not say anything himself?
danielpbarron: Jesus is the Word (scripture)
danielpbarron: it's mentioned in old and new testement
jurov: i'm certain it ended up in scripture (at least greek one) because it was controversial even then
jurov: jesus should say so, then
jurov: you want to say homosexuality is okay if it's master/slave relationship?
jurov: ofc the bigots mistranslated it as "slave"
jurov: We believe Scriputure does not condemn masturbation. Although it is typically done in wickedness (Matthew 15:19 "evil thoughts"), it can be done in godliness (Titus 1:15). yay
jurov: i want to get the bible implant
jurov: danielpbarron: who does these implants?
jurov: Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.
punkman: do the words taste like chicken?
mats: theres a lot of words on that page
mats: tasted like chicken and other things
assbot: A True Church - You Think You're Saved, But You're Not! ... ( http://bit.ly/1v4BCKy )
jurov: and if god is catholic, then you inevitably end up in purgatory
mats: you end up in cheese whiz heaven rather than nutella heaven
jurov: mats, say you just repented. that's acceptable everywhere
punkman: non-denominational is like the cheez whiz of religion
mats: is there a tiered system?
jurov: "nooo my matsy turned to heresy in his last moments!!!"
jurov: such proclamation could make her less happy than before
mats: tell my mother i converted to christianity in my last moments
mats: i just ate a hundred dumplings, i think im gonna die
punkman: I was just going by the title
mats: as the link says, the franc is perceived to be overvalued
punkman: around the time they decided to fix eur/chf?
punkman: when did the swiss get so retarded?
assbot: Central bank imposes negative interest rates - The Local ... ( http://bit.ly/1v4yTRl )
punkman: I think I might get a little fat this christmas
jurov: lmao it says there was 1 x.idiff.dec traded on 2012-12-13 and nothing since
jurov: maybe it traded before.. mhmmmm i should have adatabase for that
assbot: Hell, ain't we about more fucked than a whore at closin' time, huh?
mike_c: correct settlement price is up to MP I believe, because it flipped on settlement day again
assbot: It says some pelt-wearin' trapper, some stinkin' bean-suckin' possum skinner, he's gonna collect that reward money.
assbot: I thought I told you not to touch me.
jurov: ^ settlement price, is that right?
mike_c: well, an official announcement of the settlement price is useful because it determines the cap on the next quarter.
jurov: or at least "we'll skip this one"
jurov: even if none traded, ther should be monthly report
davout: jurov: are the x.diffs even still traded?
jurov: ;;later tell mircea_popescu x.idiff.dec expired
jurov: well.. since F.DERP isn't trading, replacing it with a bet would be worthwhile
thestringpuller: something like "DERP COMPANY to attempt/successfully raise funding in Q# 20XX"
thestringpuller: when these companies burn all their cash they'll need more money
thestringpuller: need to start making bets in parallel with derps
mats: more code that doesn't work
mike_c: it looks like it is trading on that crapxchange already?