564900+ entries in 0.344s
jurov: and
took over with arij and whatwas his name
jurov: but
then
the mess is going on, because Namworld bought most of
the shares
Anduck: this is what
this is as i see it.
Anduck: but because, you know, if you have money you can make your own rules.. you can bend
them
too..
Anduck: rg and mircea knew
they were going against grubles
danielpbarron will wait
to see if
there is a valid signature block before passing judgement
Anduck: to mmy knowledge
they all knew what
they were doing
jurov: and what about later listing on btctct, was
that okay?
jurov: grubles how should mircea know rg is acting in bad faith? did you raise your voice
then?
gribble: Rating entry successful. Your rating for user Anduck has changed from 1
to -5.
gribble: (rated <nick>) -- Get
the details about
the rating you gave
to <nick>, if any.
gribble: You rated user Anduck on Mon Aug 27 14:21:13 2012, with a rating of 1, and supplied
these additional notes: easy
transaction.
jborkl: What was
the rate, 7% per day? Or week
gribble: Rating entry successful. Your rating for user kakobrekla has changed from 1
to -5.
Anduck: ;;rate kakobrekla -5 about
the "bitbet 10btc stealing"-case, "kakobrekla| its ours cause
the private key says so."
gribble: You rated user kakobrekla on Mon Aug 27 14:22:51 2012, with a rating of 1, and supplied
these additional notes: bought bitcoinmax-account from him, smooth and nice.
kakobrekla: idk if you know how
the bitcoin works.
Anduck: can't beieve bitbet is now at
this level :D
Anduck: can coinbase now declare all
the people-deposit bitcoins as
theirs because
they own
the private keys?
mike_c: omg, ok, i just lost all interest in
this conversation.
kakobrekla: its ours cause
the private key says so.
Anduck: i'm not surprised. i still remember
the "you sent 10btc late
to bitbet, now it's ours because faq says it's ours now"
☟︎ Anduck: funny how mircea_popescu let
this happen
Anduck: just read
the contract now
Anduck: delegated by
the contract
that wasn't signed by bitvps real owner?
mike_c: you don't have
to get signatures from every person involved with a company
to execute a contract with
that company.
mike_c: "WHEREAS,
the aforenamed James "rg" Edward was delegated
to represent
the Board of Directors of BitVPS"
mike_c: it shouldn't have mentioned grubles' key if he wasn't going
to sign it. but
the contract says rg was
talking for
the board, so his was
the only "required" signature.
kakobrekla: well its not, if i do a runner now, is it mps fault
too ?
Anduck: ...to mention people, say in
the contract
that
the signatures will make it valid,
then
there's 1 signature missing,
they still let it on
the exchange and it's being
traded.
mike_c: "WHEREAS,
the aforenamed James "rg" Edward was delegated
to represent
the Board of Directors of BitVPS" << you're saying
this is untrue?
danielpbarron: well
the signature(s) on
that page are not formatted correctly, or at least I can't figure out how
to validate
them
Anduck: S.BVPS was listed on MPEx on April
the 12th, 2012, under
the ownership signature of rg,
then as of now one of
the best
trusted WoT members. It began
trading on
the 15th
that same month, with a
total market capitalisation of about 3`000 BTC.
Anduck: nope- read
the bitvps agreement
Anduck: apparently a company being listed at mpex without owners of
the company agreeing on listing it
grubles: anyway. like i said: food for
thought.
grubles: if
the web archive link isnt evidence enough
grubles: shouldnt have. because both of
them went behind my back
to list bitvps on mpoe.
mike_c: what's
the specific beef? you don't
think it should have been listed or delisted?
TomServo: grubles: what's with
the
timing? A year after delisting?
grubles: interesting considering it shouldnt have been executed in
the first place
grubles: "Should BitVPS fail
to execute
this Agreement, as for instance by but not limited
to breaching 2.2.e above, MPEX will notify
the named individuals of
their breach and may, at its sole discretion, suspend BitVPS from
trading
thus activating
the liquidation of BitVPS. "
mike_c: or at least, i'm
taking your word since i didn't check
the
two signatures
to see if one of
them was yours.
mike_c: well, but what's
the problem? Clearly you didn't sign it.
grubles: anyway, just food for
thought if anyone in here is considering working with mpoe or mircea_popescu
grubles: my current key is not
the same one btw
grubles: ill give you a hint,
theres only 2 gpg signatures.
jurov: danielpbarron i got it but
there were several other issues
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 331.63, Best ask: 332.18, Bid-ask spread: 0.55000, Last
trade: 332.2, 24 hour volume: 12015.61092957, 24 hour low: 319.9, 24 hour high: 333.95, 24 hour vwap: 326.796030377
TomServo: BingoBoingo:
The "show
trials" link on
the most recent bahahahra/ulbricht article has an errant
http:// suffix.
davout: txt.bz2 because your disk space
totally is
the limiting factor
thestringpuller: "gpg users unaffected" very similar
to "bitcoin user unaffected"
jurov: lmaoooo
there's phrack gentoo ebuild? and last
two editions are marked unstable?
davout: mircea_popescu: what
took you so long
Naphex: but he decided
to fuck with anyone with some fiat
to withdraw
Naphex: the servers only send
to any queue with user confirmation (email, otp, password
Naphex: every dude on
the internet started sending him a screenshot
Naphex: you gotta figure what happened after he posted
that
Naphex: "Oh woes, i do not have control on
the servers, i have
to manually check each
transaction"
Naphex: including all
the shitty announces
davout: and he left
the item about users being advised
to empty
their accounts?
Naphex: i'm waiting
to be cited
to give any explinations, not
talking
to
that shithead otherwise:p
Naphex: no idea,
that guy went full retard and just wrote shit on
the news page
davout: im kinda curious as
to why messages from seemingly you and your associate are still up on
the frontpage
davout: how's
the btcxchange.ro
thing going?
Adlai: cmon people, we can figure
this one out
mircea_popescu: the main reason herbivore meat is so good (and we don't eat cat) is
that its liver is so big and its diet so simple
that
the meat becomes very narrow, chemically
mircea_popescu: that doesn't work, herbivores get liver damage
then
the meat gets poisoned with fifty
thousand different byproducts of a broken liver.
BingoBoingo: The offal might have
to go
to some food recyclers, but ptobably get hella marbling in
the meat.
BingoBoingo: I mean alternately instead of beering up
the cows like
the Japanese do, it might be worth raising some seriously alcoholic cows.
mircea_popescu: i guess if we ever make
the bitcoin ranch it's getting
tried.
mircea_popescu: a good six gallons of middling burgundy should do
the
trick.
BingoBoingo: OMG Great idea, but instead of brake fluid... Wine
transfusion for
the cow before steaking it.
mircea_popescu: just
the margerine alone. it's like instead of exanguinating
the beast, you'd replace its blood with brake fluid,
then butcher it.
mircea_popescu: cakes made by machines however...
they're not really cakes.
mircea_popescu: homemade cakes are one of
those religious experiences
that put
the innocent at risk of fundamentally altering
their life. a steak gets ruined
through
the industrial process, of course, but somehow not quite
to
the degree
mircea_popescu: im having my own version
tho. no whipped cream. all home made.
BingoBoingo: Ah, we have
that here. Or at least a fascimile of it. Hard
to
tell here.
BingoBoingo: So how is
this vacation going? Still growing
tits?
mircea_popescu: no because
they'll fuck in any case after which
the guy won't marry.
Adlai: how about a couple may only get married after spending
two weeks in
that hut
mircea_popescu: there's
this ancient
tradition among german
tribes
transplanted in
transylvania,
that a couple may only divorce after having spent a day in a
tiny hut with a single plate, spoon, stool etc.
BingoBoingo: Imagine if
the only room was
the bathroon!