535500+ entries in 0.345s
mod6: i might have
to build boost 1.42 by hand.
the horror.
mod6: ok, im gotta
try
to patch up
this
thing on openbsd and see if i can get anywhere.
thestringpuller: will it `mkdir .bitcoin` on
the directory or do I have
to do it myself?
mod6: ok made
the update in here (v0.0.8.1):
thestringpuller: I gotta run it as a different user
tho cause I'm running another bitcoind rite nao
thestringpuller: hearn wanted
to merge
that in iirc, something about 2-factor?
mod6: someone posted a comment in
the powerranger github about a change
to DER
thestringpuller: maybe I missed
the memo, but what does openssl do in
the context of bitcoind?
mod6: it'll be in
the end month report... for sure
mod6: its all in
the logs and
there's a permutation matrix, etc.
mod6: well,
the really strange
thing is
that it
totally isnt consistant. just as recently as
the 26th of January I completed full sync with v0.5.3 + patches { 1, rm_rf_upnp, 2, 3, 4, & 6 } and openssl v0.9.8o
mod6: after a week of banging my head on
the wall,
that seems
to be
the
thing
that gets me and ben past
the wall.
mod6: thestringpuller: eh, i could put it
to stdout. just figured
that it was cleaner without it. but i can add it.
mod6: the current hypothesis is
that if you're not running 1.0.1g openssl you'll wedge @ 168,001
thestringpuller: i have all old libs needed
to compile bitcoind 0.72 downloaded (boost and stuff) so it should chug on some level
mod6: ill update it on my side if
that works better
mod6: guess i
tried
to get
too cute with
that line, just change it
to
this:
mod6: eh, yeah, i probably need
to
tidy
that up a bit.
thestringpuller: dmesg | grep -e ".*\\s+Linux version (.*)\\s+.*" <<
this returns zilch for me
thestringpuller: do I need
to download any
thing or does it download everything i need?
mod6: also if you want it
to not clean out
the stuff
that it builds with, change $FULL_CLEAN
to FALSE
mod6: or search
the file for XXX
mod6: i'd much rather program
this
type of stuff in perl as opposed
to sh/bash/ksh/csh/tcsh/zsh/ash *stab*
mod6: v1-4
took like 1 evening maybe 2. spent another whole day getting it working on FreeBSD, and just an hour or
two now on OpenBSD
mod6: this is
the 8th version.
thestringpuller: how long did it
take
to write
this script? looks more like a binary
than just s cript :P
mod6: and OpenBSD seems
to be using "LibreSSL 2.0" by default
mod6: there is a subroutine in
there
to check on
the openssl version, but
that needs some work yet. so its commented out from execution.
mod6: i've got a script
to pull archives, verify and patch on Linux/FreeBSD/OpenBSD. Will only compile it on Linux since we're not quite
there yet on *BSD, give it a
try, let me know how it goes:
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 221.93, Best ask: 222.23, Bid-ask spread: 0.30000, Last
trade: 222.23, 24 hour volume: 7341.41273175, 24 hour low: 218.01, 24 hour high: 223.38, 24 hour vwap: 221.330426469
gribble: Bitstamp |
There are currently 1672.5535 bitcoins demanded at or over 216.9 USD, worth 365825.458696 USD in
total. | Data vintage: 0.0232 seconds
decimation: emacs is great, but it is annoying how you have dick around with
the settings for certain poorly written extensions sometimes
decimation: ben_vulpes: did you figure out how
to get erc
to use sasl?
decimation: if you are gonna go
that route you might as well use vnc or other 'slim' window-network protocol
decimation: yeah I
think I would pick
the finger-macros
ben_vulpes: maybe i should run an x server on
the remote host as well!
ben_vulpes: decimation: i don't know
that
this was a good decision.
ben_vulpes: but
then i got all grumpy about having
to maintain multiple sets of finger macros for
the emacs-in-terminal vs
the emacs-in-xserver
decimation: irc seems
to be about 100x more complicated
than it needs
to be
decimation: I donno. I've been looking around and
there don't seem
to be very many maintained bouncers
mod6: i guess i can give it a shot. because im out of ideas on
this bug on fbsd.
decimation: I would be surprised if
they were remarkably different, other
than
the versions of supporting libs
mod6: yeah, ok, seems about
the same as fbsd
mod6: did it require any patches
to source?
ben_vulpes: <thestringpuller> It would be amazing if mod6 and ben_vulpes could rip it out of
the code completely << i like how you're implying i know anything about cpp
decimation: I remember using
the boost/bdb
that was available on
the ports
mod6: I put like 8-10 hours into it in
the beginning of January, but got side
tracked before I got
too far.
mod6: no real big effort has been undertaken
to get
the RI (v0.5.3.1) on
to openbsd yet.
mod6: last I remember, I asked in here and BB was using a forward version on obsd
that he got working, but he said it wasn't stable.
mod6: decimation: so, a guy had some patches
to make it build on obsd and it's on github, but it's like v0.9x iirc.
[]bot: Bet placed: 2 BTC for No on "The Winkdex: BTC $5000 or more in 2015"
http://bitbet.us/bet/1104/ Odds: 13(Y):87(N) by coin, 14(Y):86(N) by weight.
Total bet: 72.9218 BTC. Current weight: 90,906.
[]bot: Bet placed: 2 BTC for No on "BTC
to rally
to $4000 before July 2015"
http://bitbet.us/bet/1026/ Odds: 8(Y):92(N) by coin, 10(Y):90(N) by weight.
Total bet: 16.0199 BTC. Current weight: 38,912.
brendafdez: if
they were
to come i wouldn't care much about
the
timing
cazalla: brendafdez, don't
the good ideas come prior
to
the hang over?
mod6: mike_c:
that's an awesome graph. did you generate
that?
brendafdez: well, honestly, i was kidding with
the ponzi scheme, even
though I own
the domain ponzify.me which i
think will serve me well sometime in
the future. During a bad hangover I
thought it would be a good idea
to so something
there, along
the lines of a game which simulates a ponzi scheme, but open and hones, where all funds received in each round are distributed in
their entirety, and I only profit from a small fee deducted from each, and
the hash
brendafdez: provable fairness is not my cup of
tea
BingoBoingo: And ponzi schemes are so passe. Better just go back
to
the old Black Hand racket.
brendafdez: I meant bitcoin instead of facebook, I
trid
to replace
the word later ;)
BingoBoingo: brendafdez: If you really want
to run a ponzi scheme you might be better off on Friendster. Facebook is pretty much a law enforcement honeypot anymore.
jurov: ^my ideas, free
to use
brendafdez: i did read
the DNS post,
thankfully my own name and
the domain i use for pretty much everything start with br already
brendafdez: Either for
the ponzi scheme or for a perosnal blog, i'm still not sure which one
to do first ;)
brendafdez: I was considering seeing
that most anyone is running a ponzi scheme on facebook, I wouldn
twant
to miss out, but your opinion on
the matter would be greatly appreciated. What would you consider an appropriate domain name?
jurov: yes,. guessed
that
too
mike_c: magicaltux is just past 3 o'clock. lots of
thick red lines incoming :)
mike_c: jurov: you're
three right of mircea.
thestringpuller is crowding you with his long name.