log☇︎
486700+ entries in 0.305s
asciilifeform: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=25-04-2015#1111123 << to round off that thread, it appears that a secondhand instrument of that type can be had for 10-20k usd, where i live. ☝︎
assbot: Logged on 25-04-2015 23:01:04; decimation: unfortunately no floating point unit, but that isn't needed for the target market here
asciilifeform: and l0l, apparently no one mentioned the matchsticks. so let this count as mention. ☟︎
asciilifeform: 'where i should put this?!!!' -- 'borat'
asciilifeform: blog but too few handz
mircea_popescu: gabriel_laddel once i go to jerusalem
mircea_popescu: imo cooling was the biggest problem for the damned blades.
gabriel_laddel: mircea_popescu: are you ever going to post the Jerusalem follow-up to your Istanbul article?
assbot: Logged on 25-04-2015 22:44:55; decimation: usually with power, bus, network, etc supplied as part of the 'crate'
asciilifeform: ^ speaking of which, is anyone going to splatter out the c3 conversation re: computational sommeliers here ?
assbot: Logged on 25-04-2015 22:32:39; ben_vulpes: there's nothing more undervalued right now than cheap old blades.
asciilifeform: rather than computers
asciilifeform: but engineers who take an intense interest in 'in the end' tend to build autoguillotines. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: that's the thing.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: in the end, the amoeba get the voice.
mircea_popescu: trinque re the dos point of sale, best breakfast p[lace here had one, made like 1985 or some shit
gabriel_laddel B.A.D (bitcoin-assets distro) update #1, I just finished rewriting mozrepl in parenscript. Now to cut out extra crud.
asciilifeform: but also for many other reasons, which i will not waste readers' time on.
asciilifeform: partly because perl proggies tend to be 'throw-aways' and absolve the author of the burden of actually carrying anything through to completion or (horror) supporting
asciilifeform: partly because it allows imbeciles to feel as if they are 'sticking the finger' to those boring 'squares' who actually take the time to think things through
asciilifeform: partly because it makes a convincing simulacrum of problem-solving, as (per naggum) hollywood special effects 'may as well be the real thing'
asciilifeform: this appeals to some people
asciilifeform: gabriel_laddel: it is a mistake to describe perl as 'based on' anything in particular. it is soup, consisting of the entire contents of a crashed delivery van. soup reflective of what is to be found in the author's skullcase.
gabriel_laddel: While we're here, I'll note that being tied to text (perl) is quite limiting. On CLIM today I can tell any object how to "present" itself, i.e., how to draw itself on the screen. Such a thing is unthinkable in a language based around regexes.
asciilifeform: think this way - if the problem were entirely contained in an -available- set of abstractions of the language, the program would not need to be written! ☟︎
gabriel_laddel: way less mental fatigue looking at them, I've found << I suppose. One can learn to read most anything. The importance here is the triviality of generating "syntactically correct" program texts.
asciilifeform: one observation of mine is that the abstraction that most determines the shape of a program is
trinque: I have to run; cheers
trinque: way less mental fatigue looking at them, I've found
gabriel_laddel: s-expressions + read tables are the ultimate notational abstraction
gabriel_laddel: checkout the scala "macro" system sometime.
gabriel_laddel: not only that - you /must/ have a simple parsing algorithm, else upgrades are a bitch
trinque: gabriel_laddel: sure, seems you need code to be data to do metaprogramming well
trinque: it's a wonder I can hit the toilet with my ass ☟︎
trinque: then went on to do python and ruby in industry
gabriel_laddel: <trinque> seems relevant to the lisp vs perl thing << ummm... the angle I'm attacking this from is that meta-programming is inescapable and sexprs are the only sane way to go unless you want to program forth or APL.
trinque: yeah, and I went to a school that did C++ and Java, and dropped out of that
asciilifeform: trinque: because everywhere else on the planet 'object-oriented' is synonymous with 'profound retardation', yes
trinque: any "paradigm" of programming you'd like to use
trinque: and a few months in I'm pretty sure it has goddamn everything, so to speak
trinque: I was for example shocked to find an object system in CL as a layman
asciilifeform: it -had- to be
trinque: perl's an interface to a handful of problems, ignores other things
asciilifeform: trinque: but basic idea is that single-tasking, single-threaded box was inherently responsive
trinque: seems relevant to the lisp vs perl thing
trinque: but you could then go "oh but this is not a general interface with concepts applicable to any UI"
asciilifeform: trinque: this is not a difficult standard to achieve
trinque: and he still claims he's faster on that than any micros shit, ncr, or even more "modern" UI
asciilifeform: i don't want to buy the office chair that is successful in cheaply making infinite copies of itself into the aeons. not unless it also parks my arse well.
trinque: he could enter things like i 52345 s <ent> 3 <ent> and that would add inventory number whatever to the ticket 2 times
trinque: converation with my biz partner comes to mind where he praised this old DOS point of sale
mircea_popescu: i am merely pointing out that the perl-bashing has some serious problems in front of it.
mircea_popescu: mind that i am not proposing any change here.
asciilifeform: i just can't help but recall kreinin's piece re: how folks who are asking for meat-like architecture 'whether they want a tool, or electronic best friend or sex partner' and asked whether 'they had tried the selection of naturally-occurring ones first'
trinque: mircea_popescu: right, so we're talking about the difference between systems which try to be general solutions to (not sure how to articulate it) vs specific tools which live in a given niche?
asciilifeform: because designers did practically nuke the analogue soup. (yes, ram failures, etc. exist.)
mircea_popescu: trinque nah, it's not energetically efficient. try and power the jet off the bird's diet.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: it's so deeply baked into the structure of the world, you'll never be free of it. << johnson noise, shot noise, etc. are intrinsic to electrical circuit. yet we have to sweat and build whole other box to get pc to cough up random bits.
trinque: I wonder if we'd have done the one with the afterburner having never seen a bird
mircea_popescu: could be punishment for the usg twerps. "you now have to program on this"
mircea_popescu: anyway i should like to see a schizo computer.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: ... there must be a reason for this. << same reason eagle doesn't have jet with afterburner in his arse
mircea_popescu: broadly speaking, but that's all.
trinque: the whole of evolution unfolding each time
trinque: little blockchains themselves
mircea_popescu: trinque consider the ridiculous happenstance that all foeti have a god damned lizard tail two weeks in.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i wasn't going nearly as far as any of that.
asciilifeform: seems like we've achieved a great many of these, in the computer...
asciilifeform: <mircea_popescu> that may be. i'm just pointing out that biology offers a very significant challenge to theoretical cs. << i must confess, that i am at a loss as to which aspects of meat we should like to replicate in machines: intransigence? toe fungus? pneumonia? schizophrenia? ☟︎
mircea_popescu: trinque the main problem here is that for a large number of solid considerations, lisp would actually be a much better choice. moreover, the space alf referred to is indeed vast, but the processes narrow. in many spots the whole tree converges to a very very narrow bottleneck.
decimation: mainly because jimmy carter banned recycling because it contained the word 'plutonium'
trinque: assuming lack of perfect knowledge having multiple things to try seems appropriate
trinque: mircea_popescu: seems like systems where there are a variety of ways to solve problems accept that they don't know the "perfect" way, if there is one
mircea_popescu: that whole yucca mountain thing...
gabriel_laddel: decimation: well, now it is sitting on-site at the 100 reactor sites across the US
assbot: Trust relationship from user assbot to user gabriel_laddel: Level 1: 0, Level 2: 2 via 2 connections. |http://www.btcalpha.com/wot/trust/?from=assbot&to=gabriel_laddel | http://www.btcalpha.com/wot/user/gabriel_laddel/
decimation: yucca mountain was a terrible idea, in the sense that storing nuclear waste instead of recycling it into fissile Pu is retarded
gribble: WARNING: Currently not authenticated. Trust relationship from user assbot to user gabriel_laddel: Level 1: 0, Level 2: 1 via 1 connections. Graph: http://b-otc.com/stg?source=assbot&dest=gabriel_laddel | WoT data: http://b-otc.com/vrd?nick=gabriel_laddel | Rated since: Sun Aug 3 11:48:26 2014
gabriel_laddel: I ended up trolling through gov. documents on the yucca mountain facility (I had previously quoted wikipedia)
mircea_popescu: gabriel_laddel sure. which was this ?
trinque: yes, very expensive to the host body while it's being made
gabriel_laddel: mircea_popescu: oh, btw thanks for your input on my document
mircea_popescu: if you look in the proper context.
mircea_popescu: trinque except the product of reproduction is perhaps the most expensive thing there is
mircea_popescu: decimation enough to say "it's doing regexp"
trinque: fast and loose is fine if the product is somewhat disposable?
gabriel_laddel: what aesthetic do you wish to live in?
mircea_popescu: hey, splay that slit! no argument here.
decimation: how can anyone even make statements about what the female reproductive/baby system is doing without examining the results in each case, in molecular detail?
mircea_popescu: (because cunts obviously aren't free to choose what they use, so the need for perl must be way deeper than that)
mircea_popescu: but even if there isn't a reason for this : it's so deeply baked into the structure of the world, you'll never be free of it.
gabriel_laddel: hence they'll be beaten in the marketplace by yours truly.
mircea_popescu: gabriel_laddel this is a very minor point. the chief point, still standing, is that cunts still run on perl. there must be a reason for this.
gabriel_laddel: hence, they waste money
gabriel_laddel: this conversation is going in the direction of "heat death of the universe" so I'll note that companies that use e.g., scala have to hire a lot of people to regin in the complexity inherrent in ALGOL.
decimation: did I just stumble into an ongoing turing test?
gabriel_laddel: so they waste a lot of effort doing it.
gabriel_laddel: they all have failed, and will continue to fail
gabriel_laddel: I should note that "they" (algol programmers) try to add the tree traversal properties of lisp to their languages
gabriel_laddel: (I'm assuming you're saying "why don't you think they don't - do tree traversals")