452700+ entries in 0.284s
mircea_popescu: some derpy start-up
thing. cointerra scammers "acquired", except not really.
mircea_popescu: nfi what "hyperledger" even is or was supposed
to be, looks like pure accounting fraud but what do i know
mircea_popescu: seems
to have been a "for free" acquisition, "just pay us our salaries"
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo incidentally, know what
the "ex wall street executive" bought "bits of pay" for ?
mod6: while
trying
to figure out how
to set "BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=false" or something, i ran into
this; www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2006-October/011418.html
mod6: anyway, will check back into
that in a bit... maybe i did something weird. but i'm pretty sure it was
the correct order.
mod6: asciilifeform: I just did
the following: extracted v0.5.3.1-RELEASE applied
the following patches successfully { dnsseed_snipsnip, kills-integer-retardation, nubs-gentoo-sanity, orphange-thermonuke, orphange-tx-amputation, dns-thermonyukyoolar } but when I added
the patch for IRC demo, got
the following error:
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> mod6 perhaps something as banal as
turning off BUILD_SHARED_LIBS in cmake ? on
the grounds
that
these libraries won't be shared anyway ? << yeah, worth a shot.
mod6: But anyone is welcome
to patch on
their own.
mod6: <+pete_dushenski> i figure
that with all
the
traffic
that
the contravex '$20 node' article is receiving of late
that it's
time
to update it with a proper install of 0.5.4 << We're not
there yet.
mod6: Now, for all
the patches
that have been submitted post-release, you need
to apply
those patches directly from
the mailing list. No guide as of yet.
mod6: But, it's probably just easier
to download
the
tarball yourself and extract.
mod6: <+pete_dushenski> mod6: have you posted a foundation 'guide' since 0.0.5
that i'm not seeing on
the mailing list ? << nope.
that version should cover everything up
through
the v0.5.3.1 release.
mircea_popescu: mod6 perhaps something as banal as
turning off BUILD_SHARED_LIBS in cmake ? on
the grounds
that
these libraries won't be shared anyway ?
pete_dushenski: i figure
that with all
the
traffic
that
the contravex '$20 node' article is receiving of late
that it's
time
to update it with a proper install of 0.5.4
☟︎ pete_dushenski: which is entirely my own
thing
to figure out,
the instructions are clear
pete_dushenski: i was working from 0.0.5 yesterday on debian 7 and all was going well until i had
to edit/add 'auth.sh'
pete_dushenski: mod6: have you posted a foundation 'guide' since 0.0.5
that i'm not seeing on
the mailing list ?
mod6: i've
tried like 3 different versions of gcc, with and without my special gcc patch shoehorned in, 2 different versions of uclibc. not quite sure what
to
think yet.
mod6: im getting
to
the point of 'out of my depth'
mircea_popescu: my mind boggles
that indeed source
there present
the compile should fail. i mean... copy / paste it in your own project for chryssakes, if
ti comes
to it, wtf is
this.
mircea_popescu: have you ever
tried putting
the actual uclibc source in
there and
trying a full bore static ?
mod6: i
think
that's referring
to uclibc which is an .so perhaps
mod6: i'll see if i can get
to
that here sometime
today.
mod6: naw, haven't
tried yet.
mircea_popescu: poor guy, my heart goes out. "does
this work ? " "well it works in
the sense it
takes
the shit out of
the soup. puss is sitll
there."
mod6: well
they work in
the context
that
these files compile without /those/ specific problems (i.e. namespace problems with boost), but we still have
the gcc/uclibc issue.
mod6: do you want me
to add in
the { Gentoo Sanity } patches as well?
mircea_popescu: in other news, it looks like (fingers crossed) might have seed up
today.
mod6: all
the way up
through
the IRC demolition?
mircea_popescu: it should be spilled milk. why should
they be able
to "change" ?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform if memory serves, rarely has
there been a more effectual bureaucrat
than yezhov
mircea_popescu: we're not at war with
the united states government. we're at war with
the people making it up. governments don't exist, people do.
mircea_popescu: this is why "no committee". get
the names, ruin
their lives, let
them be replaced.
mircea_popescu: for all
their pretense,
they're people.
they cry,
they hurt,
they get hungry and desperate.
mircea_popescu: this is a fact. it's
to be used,
to hurt
THE PEOPLE involved.
mircea_popescu: more imporantly : every bureaucrat, no matter how low ranking, has an identical bureaucrat clone ready
to
take over, revving in a corner.
mircea_popescu: and
the rest of
the "rogue gallery" will be confronted with
the unpleasant dilemma
that
they're in
the
trenches, and either continue or get shot or else withdraw and get shot.
mircea_popescu: one wallace loh is going
to be confronted with
the particularly unpleasant dilemma of either saying "yeah mp was right,
they were usg all along" or else fucking up an assistant.
mircea_popescu: looky,
there's very little point in constantly rehashing
this particular form of learned helplessness
thing you got going. i don't work
that way, i never worked
that way, it doesn't in any sense work. it can be a quaint curiosity if you wish, a peculiarity of a peculiar gentleman if oyu must. it can never be more
than
that and it can never have any impact or meaning in
the world.
mircea_popescu: you're saying
this as if
their 0.5.4 has any bearing on anything.
pete_dushenski: "and c) we've progressed so far since
then, my little dearest,
these words on
this page from
this kant feller are barely worth
the paper
they're written on other
than for being so adorably archaic"
mircea_popescu: the line
they crossed is
that
they exposed
their master, and yeah
they're fucked.
mircea_popescu: his reptilian majesty is still lying about its involvement in
that particular scam.
mircea_popescu: "o, parents should
tell
their kids all about how a)
they're smarter
than kant and b) really, it was god not
this evolution bs,"
assbot: You rated user lobbes on 06-Feb-2015, with a rating of 1, and supplied
these additional notes: Well... he did
teach himself how
to view a directory....
decimation: It's depressing
that
these people are 'paid
to
think' and are engaging with bitcoin at
the level of
the average new york
times commenter
decimation: imagine dijsktra giving a
talk on
the various ways in which bitcoin code is horrifying
pete_dushenski: thought
that, if anything, code needed moar feechures.
decimation: but I would agree
that
they know from which master
they get
their pay
decimation: that doesn't mean
they know anything about bitcoin
decimation: like, why are none of you actually reading
the bitcoin code
decimation: the conference would have been about
telling uncomfortable
truths
decimation: asciilifeform: of course, if
they invited someone who actually knew about bitcoin