log☇︎
425000+ entries in 0.118s
mircea_popescu: what, you slept ?!
mircea_popescu: http://polimedia.us/dtng/c/src/136255249324.png "plz to insert buttcoinz"
mircea_popescu: lol is that the mtgox 1satoshi bot pushing the s.dice down ?
mircea_popescu: you go /query mircea_popescu to talk in private.
mircea_popescu: eeeCurrencyDotCo now is fine
mircea_popescu: people will do incredible things for pennies.
mircea_popescu: don't underestimate the interwebs slave culture.
mircea_popescu: if he does this then he's going to have a rash of people trying it.
mircea_popescu: Chaang-Noi it's liability management
mircea_popescu: sucks for margins, sucks for operations, sucks all around.
mircea_popescu: i guess this is why i am not in the business of delivering bullion to the retail postage market.
mircea_popescu: nobody insures against customs confiscations.
mircea_popescu: still. customs should get the tag.
mircea_popescu: ya those never end up well.
mircea_popescu: ah it's one of those
mircea_popescu: so then wait. if package never arrived it's the post ?
mircea_popescu: um
mircea_popescu: other guy says package was sent
mircea_popescu: Chaang-Noi so the guy says
mircea_popescu: i mean, these word against word things are difficult to break up
mircea_popescu: well for all you know buyer got the silver
mircea_popescu: haha that's ridiculous. so are they dropping that insurer now ?
mircea_popescu: well.., talk to mod6
mircea_popescu: and i give him 100 but he doesn't tow your car
mircea_popescu: if you give me a hundred bucks to give to mod6 for towing your car
mircea_popescu: so how's that on him lol.
mircea_popescu: what do you mean correctly ? like they insured the wrong item or soemthing ?
mircea_popescu: Chaang-Noi but it was insured neh ?
mircea_popescu: hello eeeCurrencyDotCo
mircea_popescu: as in, they insured the wrong item ?
mircea_popescu: what's that mean ?
mircea_popescu: why's provider getting a scammer tag again ?
mircea_popescu: what i got from the digest was, customer paid, provider shipped, insurance blew up.
mircea_popescu: Chaang-Noi he's not getting it what, are you kidding ?
mircea_popescu: mod6 your mistaken version was better
mircea_popescu: loverance ?
mircea_popescu: i liked that line enough im now digging to find who the fuck came up with it
mircea_popescu: it's spelled amateurs tho
mircea_popescu: <mod6> too many amatures not enough pros, too many bitches, not enough ho's... << good one
mircea_popescu: nn mod6
mircea_popescu: haha check this out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=149496.msg1587971#msg1587971 the whale emerges.
mircea_popescu: jumpin' jesus on a stick, three months is now a track record ;/
mircea_popescu: "I notice there are some BTC bookies. So I thought I would help bettors win more bets. I began betting on sports back in December 2012 with a nice record so far. "
mircea_popescu: how does that work ? paid if the op wins only ?
mircea_popescu: "If you're looking for a loan for Bitcoin Poker at Seals, let me know."
mircea_popescu: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=102181.msg1586172#msg1586172 lmao
mircea_popescu: if you read history it's been discussed just hourish ago
mircea_popescu: aiball as safe as i know how to make it.
mircea_popescu: o hey, it occurs to me, this is the right time to get hacked right ?
mircea_popescu: 108k is some decent volume anyway
mircea_popescu: ;;ticker
mircea_popescu: question is, can this be at all traced based on some qualities of the hash flux
mircea_popescu: obviously i can set up a mining pool account and proxy other peoples mining there.
mircea_popescu: no i mean
mircea_popescu: specifically, how traceable is hashing based on the reject rate ?
mircea_popescu: anyone rthat understands mining, how sensible is that ?
mircea_popescu: ouch
mircea_popescu: I think 67117 is proxy pool. The hash output is always simillar to SLUSH's. SLUSH has 2.6% rejection rate -they obviusly proxy pooling. Still not real proof of working ASIC.
mircea_popescu: but it'd take a brave man.
mircea_popescu: you can sell calls short which would be doing exactly that.
mircea_popescu: coingenuity https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144611.msg1585748#msg1585748
mircea_popescu: no better way to showcase btc success than a successful exit for him.
mircea_popescu: i imagine he's pretty motivated to do it too.
mircea_popescu: which you know... would be a 500% gain
mircea_popescu: but i can see erik reasonably walking away from anything under 100mn total
mircea_popescu: course, it has to happen first.
mircea_popescu: so a deal will prolly be a nice payout for btc shareholders.
mircea_popescu: 19 mn or so are certainly nothing for sometyhing like s,dice
mircea_popescu: ;;calc 46852 * 40.55
mircea_popescu: ;;ticker
mircea_popescu: course he's been saying that for a while
mircea_popescu: he was saying something about irl gambling deal.
mircea_popescu: day's volume is 200 btc. that's not much really.
mircea_popescu: !ticker m s.dice
mircea_popescu: those are always volatile
mircea_popescu: lots of small holders
mircea_popescu: maximian yeah but investor composition changed a lot, lots of pt holders,
mircea_popescu: thus one goes 65 to 75 the other 62 to 45
mircea_popescu: the immediate outlook. "shot at 20-30k with no downside" vs "not so great, maybe 2k, maybe negative"
mircea_popescu: so maybe that's what's driving prices really
mircea_popescu: on the strength of the action so far, s.dice is ahead what, 2k yet ?
mircea_popescu: motnh has barely started.
mircea_popescu: course there's another thing : on the strength of the book so far, s.mpoe could walk home with 20-30k btc.
mircea_popescu: or maybe not in spite.
mircea_popescu: maximian i guess maybe that's it, in spite of early explosive success people expect it to flame
mircea_popescu: actually i'd be much surprised if the average retail investor could even tell you what dividend his portofolio paid
mircea_popescu: irl i mean
mircea_popescu: course if you think about it, a corp that issues 10% divs a year is not automatically better than one that issues 3%
mircea_popescu: so there must be other factors
mircea_popescu: on a strictly dividend basis of accounting it's a huge gap.
mircea_popescu: yet their marketcaps are like 2:1 in favour of s.mpoe
mircea_popescu: but anyway, s.dice has so far paid ~50k satoshi per share in dividends to s.mpoe's ~2k
mircea_popescu: ftr an incorrect deposit has yet to make it to shareholders. there was a grand total of like, 1 so far.
mircea_popescu: maximian ironically enough s.mpoe shares were bought as low as 2k satoshi.
mircea_popescu: Revenue from new accounts : 70 BTC
mircea_popescu: Revenue from sales fee : 187.80380028 BTC (Total trade : 93`901.90014227 BTC)
mircea_popescu: dub http://trilema.com/mpoe-february-2013-statement
mircea_popescu: tho tbh... it doesn't seem to account for the disparity.
mircea_popescu: if people are thinking "s.dice has consistantly been over EV" it may be a consideration.
mircea_popescu: i think the fact that mpoe/mpex can't have a lossy month for shareholders may be a factor.