log☇︎
418400+ entries in 0.266s
ascii_field: chetty: the anglos being the authors of the global rapeatron, with themselves at the apex, earned the hate.
trinque: and to do otherwise would itself be a sort of exceptionalism
trinque: chetty: that I readily grant
chetty: the only reason other nations didnt rape us is us had bigger stick, they happily rape each other all the time. Americans are not special and not worthy of special hates
ascii_field: trinque: the test of obedience is when the salary checks bounce.
trinque: and rather well trained
trinque: it depends on whether the command structure in the militaristic side is decaying as badly as the civilian side
trinque: one side of me sees decay, and the other that this coup in the USA has gone perfectly well
trinque: ascii_field: talking about projectile weapons?
ascii_field: trinque: how about the other other space station? the one with 25 tonnes of trotyl and ball bearings
trinque: I don't see that at all
trinque: this all vanishes because somebody decided they wanted to do fundamentalist islam again
ascii_field: trinque: they tried, with jp
trinque: the point is I don't think anyone sits back and thinks about "what happens with the *other* space station"
trinque: and as far as that goes, indonesians didn't fight it off, so life goes as it does
trinque: white mans burden and all that
ascii_field: countdown to 'it wasn't rape!!11 they LIKED it!'
trinque: I see that.
chetty: <trinque> my understanding was that everything we did in the 20th century involved the rape of other countries// great propaganda to make americans hate themselves
funkenstein_: in fact this forum is a great example of his open source intelligence ideas
funkenstein_: on these topics i have found robert steele to be quite educational
trinque: ascii_field: yeah, I see that point.
ascii_field: trinque: have to understand that, to lizards, usa is also 'another country'
trinque: my understanding was that everything we did in the 20th century involved the rape of other countries
chetty: dont think it was really resources acquisition as it was expenditure, keep making war toys
ascii_field: which can be easier in zurich than alabama
trinque: I am referring more to the conflicts not necessarily declared wars
ascii_field: trinque: at a certain point, there is a phase transition. where life is no longer about u.s. army's 'access to necessary resources to operate' but instead col. schmuckson's access to his mansion and cocaine
trinque: chetty: this is not what happened?
chetty: <trinque> given its whole mode in the 20th century was knocking countries over for their resources?// meme of renown
funkenstein_: you know just because we can put capital letters together doesn't mean they represent a coherently motivated thing
trinque: given its whole mode in the 20th century was knocking countries over for their resources?
trinque: and isn't USM quite a bit more capable at this game?
trinque: this is precisely what ISIS seems to be doing
trinque: secure access to the things it needs to operate first, then move on from there
trinque: doesn't that apply to what USM would do generally in the aftermath?
trinque: and you were right, immediately a target in that environment
trinque: ascii_field: recall the convo about my family's farm with its gas well?
ascii_field: thing is, 'usg' is bigger than washington
mats: fragmentation is enough for us hegemony to be immaterial
ascii_field: 'no trace' is a tall order
trinque: when in history did a vast military power not fragment into many pieces, and instead dissolve completely, leaving no trace?
trinque: and I would expect a military dictatorship period directly following the fall of usg
funkenstein_: trinque, it has always been my assumption that such folks a) have the gold b) move the drugs c) controls m0 presses
trinque: I can readily see that usg is on life-support and fading
mats: given enough time, US generals will sell off parts just like SU did.
trinque: if there is not a single man inside the us military who can figure out something to do with even fragments of the thing, wtf?
mats: militaries require competent leadership. when i say existential threat, i do not mean ISIS will march on DC
trinque: what I meant about the military being the last light turned out
ascii_field: trinque: the next major usg trend is 'demand destruction'
assbot: Wikipedia - Israel is paying internet workers to manipulate online content - YouTube ... ( http://bit.ly/1Jj52ix )
shinohai: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x2DFnGI9Ac <<< Nlame the jooz
trinque: and in an economic crash we'll stop crying about destroying the gulf to get at them
trinque: am I wrong in understanding that there is still a considerable Russian military?
funkenstein_: trinque, one possibility: if no more paycheck people will just walk away, sell off the gear
trinque: whether or not ISIS controls Iraq is not the same question as whether they can destroy the United States
mats: we'll see how committed NATO is to fighting ISIS when PMCs fail to take Mosul and a few F-16s get smoked
trinque: I would really like to understand this logic by which the entire US military vanishes, rather than at worst being handed down as an heirloom
trinque: and mind I'm not particularly thrilled at the thought
trinque: we'll lose ground but there's a vast difference there
trinque: we have the stomach for the whole 20th century
trinque: I don't buy any of that
mats: ISIS merely needs USG to stfu, not die, to succeed
trinque: the us military will be the last light shut off, not the first
mats: USG cannot afford total war, and they do not have the stomach for it, either
funkenstein_: lol, yeah look at that 250 cars
trinque: the USA has done total war before, even if it's been a while
trinque: and all the rest
mats: their influence and wealth is transnational
trinque: I really don't understand this thinking, tbh
trinque: mats: some kind of "muslim unity" thing against the USA could very well happen
mats: ISIS doesn't benefit from the allegiance of any nation state, and nor do i expect any to give it
punkman: funkenstein_: and they even have an antique car museum
funkenstein_: forbes piece is nice in admitting the 1st priority of a university: real estate developer
trinque: or "wake me up when" they strike a deal with Russia
punkman: mats, aren't they already battling?
trinque: at that point I could believe that they're an actual threat, in that not they, but the actual other superpower, is a threat
mats: e.g. the kurds, shia
trinque: were I an ISIS, I would look for a large ally that was not the USA
mats: USG will attempt to parlay another group into battle against ISIS
funkenstein_: the "president" tv show seems mostly produced for foreign consumption, kinda like friends or baywatch
danielpbarron: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=12-08-2015#1236430 << have you had a cigar? they are delightful ☝︎
trinque: seems about the same size
trinque: why didn't the chechens take over even after the USSR fell?
trinque: assuming sure, said USA is aware enough to see it
trinque: if something poses an "existential" threat to the USA, what do you think will happen?
trinque: it's been trying to manipulate countries into this or that state with the military
trinque: the thing is, this has never been total war between the USA and Middle East
mats: if the caliphate is established, they'll have materialized as a real threat
mats: ISIS is an existential threat at this point in time
trinque: whether it's possible to solve that problme from the position of "US president" is questionable
trinque: as per various threads here
trinque: you know, I find it sensible that he's focusing on Mexico as a threat rather than something like ISIS
lobbes: and then you add in all the owners banging their slaves on the side. it would get murky
lobbes: would be almost impossible to trace back lineage, I'd assume
lobbes: wouldn't their ancestors have been brought in the country 'legally'; i.e as property? good point though..
trinque: though I suppose he means something smaller, getting the courts to reinterpret it
trinque: if the 14th amendment were removed via another amendment, what of the descendents of slaves?
phf: ascii_field: i believe you, just trying to figure out what might be going on
lobbes: perhaps it's in his plan. I have yet to read it myself