log☇︎
418300+ entries in 0.158s
mircea_popescu: little incentive tyo spam really.
mircea_popescu: if it happens i guess it gets changed
mircea_popescu: well a bot could but so far hasn't
mircea_popescu: yeah
mircea_popescu: ahaha so old, so new.
mircea_popescu: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-lgm4poF3JWE/TgsHwby-BlI/AAAAAAAADwQ/twan94HT6p4/020.jpg
mircea_popescu: i've never won anything.
mircea_popescu: pretty cool.
mircea_popescu: sounds legit
mircea_popescu: yeah
mircea_popescu: Diablo-D3 that aside, making a support ticked with your legit btc/usd exchanger on how to do this...
mircea_popescu: no, i don't have bitcoin's funniest inbox. bitcoin is just too funny for one single person.
mircea_popescu: i lower my head in shame.
mircea_popescu: i think i have bitcoin's funniest inbox. i say so. people more tortured than me show me snippets from their ticket systems such as "hi, how do i transfer this to silkroad?"
mircea_popescu: so a basic martingale script ?
mircea_popescu: eee
mircea_popescu: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155098.msg1651284#msg1651284 lol win.
mircea_popescu: ;;ticker
mircea_popescu: supposedly that's her hubby.
mircea_popescu: the chick in that pic is putin's younger and rather hawd daughter.
mircea_popescu: http://redhotrussia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/yekaterina-putina.jpg
mircea_popescu: that's 8 days
mircea_popescu: heh. banking vacation extended till next tue
mircea_popescu: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2296705/Accept-raid-savings-face-ruin-Cyprus-warned-hopes-Russia-led-rescue-ice.html
mircea_popescu: it's what bitcoin jesus (tm) would do.
mircea_popescu: next time ask hi mif he accepts bitcoin
mircea_popescu: o look, we're nearing 50 th/s
mircea_popescu: sorry i couldn't care more.
mircea_popescu: lol ok.
mircea_popescu: but as long as you talk in the market you're participating to the public discussion.
mircea_popescu: that's your contention, but it doesn't carry much water with me.
mircea_popescu: i wish to know for the future how much faith to place in your similar statements.
mircea_popescu: you made some statements of a third party, they're part of the public record,
mircea_popescu: not really. i'm merely interacting with you on the grounds of you speaking in this public channel.
mircea_popescu: no. caring is personal. knowledge is impersonal. there's a categorical distinction you're trying to equivocate.
mircea_popescu: because i want to know everything.
mircea_popescu: can't get too far in life without evaluating people.
mircea_popescu: i don't particularly care. i wanted to know whether it does or it doesn't.
mircea_popescu: listen, simmer with all the projections kay ?
mircea_popescu: i get worked up ?
mircea_popescu: not really much to me either way.
mircea_popescu: why exactly would i do or not do anything because some people are stupid/unethical/whartever ?
mircea_popescu: you can ask yourself the same thing, neh ?
mircea_popescu: can you articulate this feeling of yours ?
mircea_popescu: hum.
mircea_popescu: it's an ethical issue, you just don't want to face it.
mircea_popescu: yeah. so, stop being such a weasel.
mircea_popescu: these two are all there's available to you. if you're not speaking in verse, then it's prose. necessarily.
mircea_popescu: there's also verse.
mircea_popescu: you know midnightmagic , you are currently speaking in prose.
mircea_popescu: if it's not your idea of how things should be and it's not your idea of beauty, and it's not what you expect the gods want then what is it
mircea_popescu: yes well, it has to have a source you know ?
mircea_popescu: what deflection ? yer the one trying (kinda lame-y) to impugn or whatever.
mircea_popescu: wth is this, the movies ?
mircea_popescu: vast conspiracies of evil people whispering me basic law in the ear
mircea_popescu: eh get out, retaliation and whatnot
mircea_popescu: cause there just aren't that many categories left.
mircea_popescu: or are you about to tell me you're metaphisically dissapointed ?
mircea_popescu: but you've failed to answer.
mircea_popescu: you're not quite that important, sorry to burst that bubble.
mircea_popescu: what, an aesthetic rather than ethical consideration ?
mircea_popescu: so this is all fine & dandy best you can determine then ?\
mircea_popescu: ...
mircea_popescu: that'd be a new one.
mircea_popescu: i wonder wtf.
mircea_popescu: turns out it's about as unexpected as it gets ?
mircea_popescu: anyway, the shocker for me in all this is that i thought all this is plain obvious to anyone considering the matter.
mircea_popescu: which words ?!
mircea_popescu: sadly they have no product, and so...
mircea_popescu: i have jurisdiction on those.
mircea_popescu: read closer. sueing discussion was re bfl
mircea_popescu: go on ?
mircea_popescu: which is why i even bothered to post.
mircea_popescu: hey, i'm strictly the keeper of mine.
mircea_popescu: i would imagien ethics are universal, but who knows.
mircea_popescu: midnightmagic i have no idea about chinese law. my judgement as to ethics is based on my space, not theirs.
mircea_popescu: what's hypocritical about that ?
mircea_popescu: they could have *maybe* weaseled it past if they just kept doing the same thing.
mircea_popescu: pigeons the price increase is the trigger.
mircea_popescu: pigeons i don't recall them asking / me caring at that tiem.
mircea_popescu: actually, if bfl delivering weren't such a moot point, i'd be collecting these rights as we speak and sueingthem into oblivion anyway
mircea_popescu: pigeons it's not my made-up world.
mircea_popescu: you owe them on the difference.
mircea_popescu: now, on the basis of this, if you later charge more per item than what you've disbursed to your original equity holders,
mircea_popescu: you'll have to quote and construct arguments.
mircea_popescu: now, this is how things are. this isn't open to debate, it's long established point of law. you're welcome to challenge it, but it can't be challenged by simple personal exceptionalism.
mircea_popescu: and if no such agreement exists, to an equitable stake.
mircea_popescu: point 3 : any capital transfer with a view of a common enterprise is an equity buy, entitling the payer to a stake in the common enterprise, as agreed
mircea_popescu: becaue of this, any purported sale of inexistant mining equipment is to be quashed as such.
mircea_popescu: point 2 : any purchase may only be entertained by a seller of an existant item. nobody can sell what they don't own.
mircea_popescu: this was point 1.
mircea_popescu: this was prostitution, not textile appreciation.
mircea_popescu: so for instance if you pay a girl five dollars to feel her underwear and she sucks your cock while you do it
mircea_popescu: any capital exchange will be for consideration. the nature of this consideration is not the empire of the parties, but a matter of fact.
mircea_popescu: so :
mircea_popescu: yeah, if we can get to it, i'd like to explain this pre order money thing, cause it's what's important here.
mircea_popescu: proving its not at all will be too hard to be worth it, so can we just leave it aside ?
mircea_popescu: anyway, this entire pre miningargument is a waste of time. i said "a little", you so far are making a case it's not a lot, maybe it;'s not a lot.
mircea_popescu: the one friedcat had to say "it's not us"
mircea_popescu: midnightmagic there was a one thing doingmore than asic at some point.