39000+ entries in 0.266s

diana_coman: mod6, fwiw
I'm again locked out of trilema-mod6 ("channel is invite only")
mod6:
I did a core dump, and the call stack seems to indicate when
I'm "stuck", it's stuck in an lseek() call.
☟︎ mod6: thanks for the update diana_coman.
i've been running with that patch too --
I've had some falling behind
I believe not related to his vpatch, and instead related to ssd disk flakyness (as detailed in last month's SoBA).
a111: Logged on 2017-08-04 22:56 asciilifeform: and this is true of pretty much any box that makes decent trb node (
i.e. has sata3 + ssd )
BingoBoingo: So there is a very small fraction of the people normally at the CoWork on Fridays here.
I can't tell if it is because it is Friday the 13th or if it is the Mumps outbreak.
lilly_:
I do this one then brb
shivalry: Yea
I have ckang help then. Ty
shivalry:
I am just unsure how such a situation works in practice.
shivalry:
I suppose it goes both ways though too...
shivalry:
I would like some slave boys 😍
mircea_popescu: so the good talk therapist would point out to the person interested in this particular magic pill exactly what he'd say to the "
i want ai because
i don't have a gf" nut : "have you tried the NATURALLY OCCURING solutions first ?"
shivalry:
I suppose the retardation is more difficult, similar to something thats been oxidized.
shivalry:
I believe the mind can be made malleable again under the right circumstances.
shivalry: Nope,
I just like to see how people look at such things
mircea_popescu: well,
i change my mind on occasion, but alter it ? not really.
shivalry:
I've only done this for BFs so unless they put them somewhere, not to my knowledge.
shivalry: In Asia they have surgery for big eyes
I believe
mircea_popescu: (
i kid you not, ox-eyed was a compliment 3k years ago)
a111: Logged on 2018-04-12 21:38 asciilifeform: whether it is possible to create this condition mechanically, purely from result of vehicle's motion --
i do not know
a111: Logged on 2018-04-12 21:29 jurov:
i think the vortex sorts particles by momentum, not necessarily by temperature
a111: Logged on 2018-04-12 20:55 asciilifeform: spyked: in re proof machines,
i'm much moar interested in items like ACL2 , where you can affix your hand-written program to a hand-written proof of correctness in a mechanically-reliable way
mircea_popescu: btw, does it occur to anyone else that #trilema is way ahead of
i dunno, black-chicks-code or whatever other imperial nonsense in terms of both headcount, volume or value of female participation in techgeneering ?
lobbes: technical design aside though, there's still that obvious fact that we have to rely on various $mtgoxes for market price :/ Though
I'm not sure what be a better source for a fiat-btc exchange rate (iirc this was a mini-thread somewhere in logs)
lobbes: Then
I have Process B that is triggered on changes to that database doing the various "market price" retrieval and volume averaging. Process B inserts retrieved data into database and Process A responds accordingly
a111: Logged on 2018-04-12 20:20 spyked: zx2c4,
I've been looking over the tamarin protocol verification paper and
I'm curious, what does "symbolic verification" mean? also, what's the thing's output? is it just a "yes, properties hold" or does it also output the proof?
saturn_:
i did not get my bitcoins yet xc
ben_vulpes: yeah
i can't this thread anymore, too damn seductive.
ben_vulpes: "
i know, let's premix our fuel and oxidizer!"
ben_vulpes:
i think it puts the water in the wrong place. you get dry, hot air which you'd then have to cool and compress into the engine and cold wet air (possibly with the water condensed out entirely with a spigot)
jurov: but
i don't know if same temperature means h2o and o2 molecules have same momentum? or they have same kkinetic energy?
jurov:
i think the vortex sorts particles by momentum, not necessarily by temperature
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-04-12 20:10 trinque: a muntzed drakma would be a fine thing,
I'd sign
spyked: zx2c4,
I've been looking over the tamarin protocol verification paper and
I'm curious, what does "symbolic verification" mean? also, what's the thing's output? is it just a "yes, properties hold" or does it also output the proof?
☟︎ trinque: a muntzed drakma would be a fine thing,
I'd sign
☟︎ spyked: whole thing's a mess, but
I'm organizing the code so that
I can eventually replace it with something else.
spyked: okay then,
I'm gonna work it off this. it'd be enough to replace the "drakma"
http client with something lighter, and
I'd already cut about half of it. the dependency tree leads to two xml parser libraries being used (plus other redundant stuff).
spyked: trinque, yeah,
I'm actually playing with cl-feed-parser to get an idea of what's required for the feed bot, going to spec it and all.
I grabbed it off the githubs (
https://github.com/tkych/cl-feed-parser ) and the number of dependencies is irksome, so if you happen to know a better alternative other than building my own,
I'm open to suggestions
trinque: spyked: any chance you want to do mircea_popescu's requested RSS bot?
I've got plenty on my plate as it stands.
lobbes:
I was going to hop on to state this very point, but alf beat me to it so
I will simply underline and point to trilema article referenced twice above. My own trust for various people (read: cryptographically backed identities) in here was not immediate, but evolved over the 4 years
I've spent interfacing with said people. >>
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-12#1797719 ☝︎ avgjoe: after seeing that raiblocks was just some random coin,
i tried to understand better bitcoin and found trilema as a very valid starting point, no-frills like, to use bitcoin in a responsable manner
avgjoe: and a couple of months ago
i was lucky to cash out in bitcoin the crazy (at least for me) amount generated by solving captchas
avgjoe: then this coin has gained popularity for supposed scalability features that
i've never investigated
avgjoe:
i'm a student,
I've discovered bitcoin thanks to raiblocks
trinque:
I will at least say mircea_popescuine features come way first.
trinque: depends on whether
I think people oughta come in through existing users, or not
ben_vulpes: trinque: dude has a point, self-referential though it might be faq.html would benefit from an "
i am trinque, and have been running this service for members in good standing of the #trilema wot and others before it since XXX"
avgjoe:
i mean, ok, it works for noobs, but at the same time you don't know instantly who is managing the keys
trinque:
I am at "dog on internet" status for you
avgjoe: so if
I understand correct: all the deedbot functions are ready to go for a newcomer, except for the wallet function that works well after having a good wot connection
avgjoe: trinque: may
I also ask, is just the wallet feature that need human presence or deedbot does other semi-auto functions?
trinque: asciilifeform: sure, maybe some guy trusts me and
I think he's crazy
trinque: avgjoe: the point being, while
I can give you a lot of nice words about not stealing your bitcents, this doesn't amount to much.
avgjoe: ok, so as long as
i see trinque alive on irc
i can feel safe about my test bitcents on it
avgjoe: is a feature for doing off chain transactions by trusting the human meat or
i'm missing something?
mircea_popescu:
i know,
i know. just saying, "we picked the non-chosen candidates at random, go sue."
avgjoe:
i supposed that was an hot wallet feature
avgjoe: a curiosity about the deedbot wallet feature: if
i use that feature, who is controlling the keys?
mircea_popescu:
i dunno what your experience with "peer review" is, but as far as anyone involved is aware, exactly no review goes on in those circumstances. see sokal & all.
a111: Logged on 2018-04-12 16:25 zx2c4:
i havent compiled a list of Name+WrittenReview. maybe
i should do that
TrixxC:
i brb there is someone at door
britknee:
I haven't actually been, by blood
britknee: oh
I will put the word out then