log☇︎
341600+ entries in 0.057s
mircea_popescu: bets
mircea_popescu: write a google search application that finds answers to bets based on queries derived from bet text,
mircea_popescu: ie, here's a very simple way to have fun as a bright young programmer :
mircea_popescu: people could actually write bots for this.
mircea_popescu: something like "x on winner, half x on loser for all bets" or w/e other strategy
mircea_popescu: generally speaking mechanical, constraint betting results in better ev than "feelers".
mircea_popescu: perhaps in the sense of varying it 0 - x, binary like
mircea_popescu: maybe.
mircea_popescu: this is a living, split x btc on each bet, early.
mircea_popescu: anyway, 5.x btc profit on a 70ish btc budget as a handicapper is really not that bad.
mircea_popescu: 99.94% i say!
mircea_popescu: ;;calc 0.04 / 66.2
mircea_popescu: so 66.2 theoretical, 66.16 practical.
mircea_popescu: spikes on the graph
mircea_popescu: yeah hehe
mircea_popescu: ;;calc 1324 / 2 * .1
mircea_popescu: blame the blockchainz.
mircea_popescu: a well, i tried.
mircea_popescu: holy shit you're right.
mircea_popescu: also Neil ^
mircea_popescu: and nice article. somebody should dump it on reddit.
mircea_popescu: mike_c the point about "it dun really matter so much to correctly identify the house" stands too, for the angle discussed in chat.
mircea_popescu: ha! the house clears 10% ? i had it pegged at about 8%
mircea_popescu: 99`9xx weight = same weight in this sense anyway.
mircea_popescu: 1. take first 3 bets. 2. exclude one. 2.1 either the 1st, if it has the same exit addy as one of the other 2, and the two have same weight, or else the 3rd.
mircea_popescu: mike_c take first 3, exclude 3rd. whay problem ?
mircea_popescu: now give me a counterexample to that.
mircea_popescu: usually in the 99,995+-2 range
mircea_popescu: but the two you keep always have the exact same weight
mircea_popescu: or else at lower weight than the other two
mircea_popescu: mike_c the one you exclude a) always has the same output as one of the remainder two and is either made at weight 100k
mircea_popescu: mike_c the correct selection for house bets is to take the first three bets of any wager, and exclude one of them
mircea_popescu: i guess im one of the major market foreces there
mircea_popescu: so i bought like a piggy
mircea_popescu: now i look at the market, prices fell an average of 40% across all product classes.
mircea_popescu: also in the news, i took about a week off because of all the press nuttery, during which i stopped buying raw materials
mircea_popescu: you give me the btc
mircea_popescu: sure
mircea_popescu: what's that ?
mircea_popescu: speaking of.
mircea_popescu: http://www.networkworld.com/news/2014/032514-atm-malware-controlled-by-a-280030.html
mircea_popescu: ah
mircea_popescu: maybe diff checksm implementations ?
mircea_popescu: aaand trilema, teh rift guild just went over 1k members
mircea_popescu: mike_c pm
mircea_popescu: better w/o the xyz
mircea_popescu: perhaps the least understood topic under the sun
mircea_popescu: yahoo's pretty good for trollage apparently
mircea_popescu: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130615094529AAJ01dh
mircea_popescu: i dunno.
mircea_popescu: all these folks looking for a mom.
mircea_popescu: nubbins` gotta have that narrow waist etc.
mircea_popescu: i like big women too, but these seem big in all the wrong ways in all the wrong places.
mircea_popescu: aren't they a little... porky ?
mircea_popescu: nubbins` http://trilema.com/2009/un-crumb-de-frisco/
mircea_popescu: caliban is subhuman.
mircea_popescu: srsly nao, caliban is never smart. ever.
mircea_popescu: then you're regaled something from the roadside freakshwo cca 1905
mircea_popescu: lmao at all this "genetically superior both physically and mentally"
mircea_popescu: i believe the guy never saw a russ meyer film.
mircea_popescu: http://theartofattraxion.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/robert-crumb-history-of-women-w-magazine-3-1.jpg
mircea_popescu: darn son.
mircea_popescu: ;;google a crumb of frisco
mircea_popescu: s/chemist/whoever lays
mircea_popescu: nubbins` isn't it traditionally reserved for the girlfriend of the chemist making the dope ?
mircea_popescu: it was stupid anyway
mircea_popescu: talktotat.
mircea_popescu: smarter people than me halping.
mircea_popescu: davout http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=17-03-2014#563385 ☝︎
mircea_popescu: davout well i can't find it now. some kid from the "community" of self-proclaimed experts wrote some sort of article/"white paper" on how bitcoin exchanges should do x y z to get their risk of blowing up in line with the risk of the average 20yo getting hit by a bus
mircea_popescu: eh we discussed here a little bit back lemme see
mircea_popescu: novusordo yeah, i believe this is a mpex innovation.
mircea_popescu: that part wasn't covered.
mircea_popescu: because you know, little train engines that can, these people.
mircea_popescu: somehow not mentioning micromorts or anything
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform yeah something based on how likely it is for the avg 20yo to bite it
mircea_popescu: supported by evidence this strange view oif his, seeing how bitcoin exchanges have the life expectancy of trisomic neonates
mircea_popescu: davout from what i recall, some random idiot opining was claiming that getting the average bitcoin exchange at the safety rate of the average human would be a great gain in security.
mircea_popescu: bitcointalk is full of examples.
mircea_popescu: asset-based corps dampen management incompetence, allowing outright thieves to run for a longer time than the yshou;d
mircea_popescu: davout which makes the bad actors quickly visible
mircea_popescu: yeah that part is my opinion.
mircea_popescu: which part, the different risk class part or the sorting of the classes part ?
mircea_popescu: well ok.
mircea_popescu: not saying asset-holding is bad for all time or anything, but it is riskier.
mircea_popescu: which they are.
mircea_popescu: the argument boils down to "fully distributed, non-asset hodling btc corps are a better risk class"
mircea_popescu: davout hypotetical hypoteticals are hypopotami
mircea_popescu: what isn't in scope is anything else.
mircea_popescu: so what's in scope is running the court system of bitcoin
mircea_popescu: to this position where he jsut lost a good 90% of his value
mircea_popescu: investor has gone from this position where he realises gains each month
mircea_popescu: then two years later wynn hotels hit a slow patch, get sold for scrap
mircea_popescu: and it finally means that about 70% of that value is actual assets.
mircea_popescu: this also means the share will go up, say 100x
mircea_popescu: this obviously will force a modification o the contract, making bitbet a nz0 now.
mircea_popescu: the forums will be extremely excited at this development.
mircea_popescu: but consider this : suppose tomorrow some great[ly idiotic] new manager takes over from me, and decides to expand bitbet by buying wynn hotels.
mircea_popescu: nothing forces you into a 100% bitbet portofolio.
mircea_popescu: expansion in that sense is not useful for an investor.