336600+ entries in 0.201s

mircea_popescu: i'd almost be mildly insulted, if it weren't for
the fact
that my fucking spam filter identified it correctly on
the first pass.
mircea_popescu: smells
to me like long dead bait job some 3rd line derp is
trying
to spring back
to life on us, but hery.
mircea_popescu: well
this item is from mid 90s, sat buried for
the interval.
mircea_popescu: btw, how's
the "ethereum ecosystem" doing
these days ? all
the shit
they were going
to launch months ago... just around
the corner!
mircea_popescu: when people go all scholarly and shit on me, and start with
the "We show" bullcrap i fucking expect
them
to use
the words
they mean
to use.
mircea_popescu: what i wish
to know is how did he establish his ought.
mircea_popescu: there's a difference between "can rarely be" and "never is".
they do not speak of
the same world.
mircea_popescu: absolute paydirt. WHY "can rarely be". who
told you ? etc.
mircea_popescu: studied hard problems and so are frequently designed specifically
to resist known cryptanalytic"
mircea_popescu: large integers. Modern symmetrickey ciphers, on
the other hand, can rarely be reduced
to widely
mircea_popescu: studied problem
that is believed
to be difficult, such as factoring or finding discrete logarithms of
mircea_popescu: "Most modern publickey ciphers are designed
to reduce or at least relate closely
to some long
minzie_: want
to
trade in exchanges
mircea_popescu: minzie_ can you be specific ? what are you
trying
to do ?
minzie_: anyone know some good bitcoin
trading software??
PeterL: isn't it great when people
take one word with a definite meaning and slap it onto something completely unrelated?
PeterL: nah mag sulphate got demoted from
the name, it's fine
to use
mircea_popescu: "Bath Salts: As of July 22, 2011 possession of Bath Salts is a Class 4 Felony with
the same sentencing as above." ahahaha wut.
minzie_: he isnt online at
the moment, is he?
PeterL: asciilifeform re hasty pudding cypher: didn't you say key
tables are evil?
mircea_popescu: just as long as
this a) doesn't invalidate assumptions required by one in a way operator couldn't verify and b)
they are actually independent, as opposed
to "i
thought
they were"
mircea_popescu: also asuming
that A USEFUL WAY
TO COMPOSE is always available is nonsense. and certainly asuming
that
the obvious composition is correct.
mircea_popescu: it is not a bad paper. it is also not a bad
thing
to look for. unlike "cold fusion" and like "dark energy extraction", it has no actual merit for fundamental reasons.
BingoBoingo: PeterL: I woke up at 22:00 local
time. Hazard of working Internet full
time.
mircea_popescu: i wouldn't per se object
to girl wearing "lightsaber armorer" cocktail dress, if
that's
the fashion, as long as it grabs her
tits and waist right etc.
BingoBoingo: PeterL: Maybe It's just getting late. My
troll/humor doesn't seem
to be calibrated right.
mircea_popescu: and so no, i'm not paying anyone anything
to add "lightsaber armor"
to my clothing.
BingoBoingo: Ah. I guess a point could be made
that if Obama's Hope and Change didn't fix
the problem Bernie's isn't likely
to either.
mircea_popescu: it belongs in
the same heap as
the audible / visible lasers,
the bullets
that spark off rock walls & al.
mircea_popescu: it is pointedly NOT a scientific notion, for
the record, not anymore
than communism is ; and in no danger of ever becoming one, such as occasionally sf items did become.
PeterL: BingoBoingo but
the comment agrees with your article
mircea_popescu: was specifically discussing "quantum" as
the literary fanon concept
BingoBoingo: PeterL: It mentioned
the Bern, just kinda assumed it was. Didn't read
too closely.
mircea_popescu: it has exactly 0% chances
to exist. if it did exist, however,
the changes would be far reaching enough
to render any present arrangements void anyway.
PeterL: how is
that comment
troll-y?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i on
the other hand am more
than willing
to die by
this imaginary "quantum" computing.
BingoBoingo: As long as
the email hasn't been used in spam, email isn't going
to be
the
thing
that makes or breaks a comment's journey past
the spam filter
BingoBoingo: PeterL: We do, but it would be bad journalism
to disclose such
things. And really how often are we actually going
to
test emails anyways.
PeterL: don't you collect commenters' emails, do you have
to ask?