log☇︎
330400+ entries in 2.162s
BTC-Mining: I shouldn't interupt the pary like that.
BTC-Mining: EskimoBob, yeah, I'm kind of pushing Nefario a bit for funds/portfolio managers to have the option to make the account holdings public at any time directly from GLBSE
BTC-Mining: I guess maybe all of them, CPA/NYAN/BMF?
BTC-Mining: Yes, what I'm saying. Stupid people collecting money on lies to put in ponzis
BTC-Mining: "But I thought Pirate was safe!"
mircea_popescu: i think that may be better than average in terms of risk.
BTC-Mining: Yeah... I think I'll loan to myself and just roll if I was interested in such a risky investment
BTC-Mining: I thought they'd drop more =/
nefario: which I have to follow
Bane_Capital: How many GLBSE shares are there in total? That might be classified but I am interested.
nefario: I think if the shareholders go for it
Bane_Capital: I tried to warn a friend in Argentina about this
nefario: I think leanards a section 8
nefario: I believe he is using a full metal jacket reference
nefario: and I would try to explain about the context and sarcasm
BTC-Mining: I think everyone knew
BTC-Mining: Yeah, but you told me you were in Canada, I'm 99.99% sure of that. Plus .ca domains are for canadian business/residents only.
nefario: I'll sell all his info for a burrito
BTC-Mining: I'm pretty sure you said so...
BTC-Mining: I thought you were in Canada
mircea_popescu: there was a guy who kept track of it independently but i dun recall who now
BTC-Mining: I'll take ∞% interest then =P
mircea_popescu: o. i meant mpoe bonds. they have the advantage you set your own interest.
PsychoticBoy: I will get mine first
BTC-Mining: mircea_popescu: yes I was looking at the passthroughs
BTC-Mining: I should probably read actual income statements
BTC-Mining: So I guess I can't currently purchase.
BTC-Mining: Seeing last dividend... I'd say 0.15 BTC
BTC-Mining: Well I need something to spend money on. Got 280 BTC laying around and looking for some deals.
Lucidize: anywayreally gotta go, i wasn't trolling - just caught a sentence from diablo that annoyed me and wanted to make a short comment =)
Lucidize: I see what you are saying, but generalizing is also poor form
mircea_popescu: i just think it's the sort of non-concept the intellectually lazy hide behind
Lucidize: do i have to correct myself, u can't see what that is supposed to say? lol
Lucidize: it doesn't matter, i don't usually converse with bottom feeders
kakobrekla: i turned it first!
Diablo-D3: I think thats the worst offense of them all
Diablo-D3: I already know most of the story
Diablo-D3: you know what I want to know?
Diablo-D3: japan only has one princess, and unless she happens to be far more elegant than she looks, I would not hit that.
Diablo-D3: I thought he was trolling
DeaDTerra: Anyways, I am going to go back to my studies brb
DeaDTerra: I just feel like Nef is getting a lot of shit recently
DeaDTerra: fuck I should have had a bid up...
DeaDTerra: I would bail if EB took over
Diablo-D3: can I be a deamon? :<
mircea_popescu: i'm really dissapointed in mpoe-pr's performance ;/
Diablo-D3: Smoovious: I need to start Diablo Popcorn Shipping Services
Luceo: If they start making that mandatory I'm going 100% MPEX
Obsi: Meh, I only bought METAL & METAL.SILVER to launch METAL.COPPER, but I ain't verifying diddly
Obsi: Who do I bribe to get an asset approved?
Diablo-D3: wait, I wonder if that means Im unionized now
Diablo-D3: and if Im going to be a drama actor, I demand to be paid like one
smickles: I began the process of sueing the state and the decided to pursue the other guy instead. Technically, i think they still consider it my mobilehome
mircea_popescu: well i guess those states suck
smickles: in my specific trouble, I boght a mobile home, the later sold it to someone else. The state rejected the title transfer
smickles: i ran into this issue specifically with a mobile home once
smickles: mircea_popescu: with personal property of an individually taxable value, I have to meet state requirements to sell it
smickles: i don't cosider myself to be the owner of "my car" because I have to get state permission to sell it
BTC-Mining: I should stop commenting on things. Seems it provokes arguments somehow... better stay silent.
k3t3r: you dont have to believe ne i dont care either wya
mircea_popescu: yes, i can. i doubt you can, but anyway. cite.
k3t3r: i am serious though you cann read the road traffic act
mircea_popescu: and i'm not paying for your illiteracy.
jcpham: i can use a gun to prove it's my car too
jcpham: i thought you were saying titties
smickles: i'm sure there are many more situations too
smickles: like i said earlier, x proves y at time z
smickles: if i wanted to presentthe traditional financial reports of a company and have the data verified by glbse
smickles: i think it's useful for online people too
smickles: I don't see why you need a specific and complicated example to see the benifit in an exchange automatically signing a doc like you want.
BTC-Mining: I suppose.
smickles: well, didn't i suggest that the information be signed because it add benifit at almost no cost?
BTC-Mining: Yes. For that it could be helpful except GLBSE users are anonymous and I can't send them documents offline.
smickles: this is what i meant to imply by related or unrelated. the data presented could contain more than just the assets in the account link information
smickles: mircea_popescu: also, if i understand deeds correctly, their main purpose is to prevent the individual from owning the thing independantly. in the case of cars, you don't own your car, you and the state own that car
smickles: "it's to prove ownership" BTC-Mining am i missing something here, or were you wanting to prove ownership of assets in a glbse account?
mircea_popescu: i dunno guy.
BTC-Mining: But I can't publish that myself, the point would be for people to be able to verify themselves directly on GLBSE.com what a public account is holding.
mircea_popescu: i'm not suggesting anything really.
BTC-Mining: GPU/ASIC mix I would believe.
smickles: I would tell you the name, buy i haven't reserved it yet
BTC-Mining: It's loaned to BitBond in exchange of hashing tho. I wonder what he spent it on.
smickles: BTC-Mining: because i'm going to start an accounting company once if finish this move
Bane_Capital: BTC-Mining: I like that you haven't bought mining hardware yet. Smart move.
BTC-Mining: Aye, anyway. I need something to spend BTC on.
BTC-Mining: Yeah, I meant the info to be shown directly on GLBSE
smickles: (or i trust that other person)\
smickles: well, if i don't know how/don't want to call on an api, then i cant trust someone else telling me the info unless it's signed by glbse
BTC-Mining: as in if, for example, I check a box in settings to make holdings public
BTC-Mining: I'd want the info to be made public
BTC-Mining: So I guess simply making the data API visible would be enough.
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla i ain't betting :p
kakobrekla: mircea_popescu, might see 10mn? we gonna see 10mn. i bet 1 btc on it.
mircea_popescu: smickles i have no ideea, the only thing seems to be that network hash output growth consistently beats expectations.
BTC-Mining: Yeah, I was not talking about an "audit" audit
smickles: Smoovious: i think BBBB leaves their funds on the exchange (or claims to anyway)
smickles: even if it were legal for me to do it, i would be uncomfortable auditing all but the simplest business models
nefario: I suppose someone would just need to move the BTC off GLBSE to fuck that idea up
nefario: I'm sure a script could be written
nefario: I expose an API