log☇︎
33100+ entries in 0.021s
mp_en_viaje: but from the pov of sane man -- everyone's in for having been caught, which is a stupid thing to do .
a111: Logged on 2019-05-17 22:30 asciilifeform: i imagine all of the holes look quite similar from mp_en_viaje's olympus tho -- sorta like stones on the ground, mountains to ant, all look ~same from man's height
mp_en_viaje: http://btcbase.org/log/2019-05-17#1914457 << rather, a holes a hole. no doubt makes a difference to prisoners themselves, as well as to professional prisoner herders, what everyone's in for. ☝︎
asciilifeform to bed, has all of tomorrow calendared for ffaism, so really ought turn in nao
asciilifeform: lol inb4 ( tho did read ~that~ , who didn't )
asciilifeform: this thrd is imho incomplete without a quote from some 16th c italian comedy that asciilifeform never heard of but mp_en_viaje happens to have translated !1
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, quite exactly. a re-read of the ingenious nobleman sir don quixote de la mancha through this critical lens might be most informative. note how panza is ~not hired~.
mp_en_viaje: now, there's nothing wrong with one who just happens to be a hero. EXCEPT if he has such poor grasp of money, inkeeps start laughing at him.
asciilifeform: ok then makes sense
mp_en_viaje: market is that situation where you can price things. the exact opposite of heroics.
asciilifeform: aa in this context 'market' as an artificial object, of civilized life, like 'plumbing', vs. merely the set of all possible interactions (incl. 'dumping', burning down competitor, etc. ) ?
a111: Logged on 2019-01-04 17:18 mircea_popescu: why the fuck didn't i think of that.
mp_en_viaje: in other words, market is what's left once the minimax approach was defeated. much like water doesn't burn -- because it has burned already -- minimaxing in context of money, language, human relationships does not work.
asciilifeform is to same degree 'market expert' as 'fighter pilot'. but does know this basic.
mp_en_viaje: not even a matter of predictable (as in, will be defeated in future). it happens to attempt to go agains tthe specific gradient of what the whole system does. market ~altogether exists~ so as to close the 0-infinity gap
asciilifeform: also i entirely believe mp_en_viaje that it dun work in markets. predictable, so loses.
asciilifeform: i.e. working strat in game theor. context
asciilifeform: mp_en_viaje: iirc the trad term ( for what 'doesn't work in used cars biz' ) is not, is 'robust'
mp_en_viaje: in markets, the minimax strategy is universally inept, specifically because you lose through average losses not through catastrophe.
asciilifeform: as in the plant
mp_en_viaje: this strategy works sometimes, but it never works in the context of used cars, because ~many other agents played the game already~.
asciilifeform: well ultimate minimax is... tree
mp_en_viaje: this is the strategy of blondy : the wildest possible edge of "40Gs" as a price would be if the G's were those found in Kellog's. to ~insure herself against the maximum loss where that's what the yactually were~, she proceeds to cut them out, and see.
mp_en_viaje: minimaxing works fine in engineering and d&d. it is not a workable strategy in energy exchange, be it in the form of boat-on-sea or in the form of picking-up-chick or in the form of find-jerb etc.
mp_en_viaje: this is fine and dandy, but you have to look at the thing, and evaluate it, and improve it through the usual rational process. rather than pretend it's not even there.
asciilifeform: mp_en_viaje: helps to remember that i've never seen actual troo money, except in microscopic quantities, and even this only since btc introduced
asciilifeform: ( orig. iirc persia, 'to idiot, i gave an axe, so he would cut some wood; but went instead to mosque, the door he smashed best as he could' )
mp_en_viaje: which is the substance of my objection : that on certain topics, which aren't randomly distributerd but structurally related to money (in the sense of social interaction) you tend to apply such wildly inadequate macroexpansions.
mp_en_viaje: tv show. not really : blondy public woman, very dim, decides she wants car, asks how much, is told 40G's, starts cutting out the letter g from cereal boxes
asciilifeform: ought to ?
asciilifeform: will confess, not seen this film
mp_en_viaje: because it takes a certain dose of insanity to think the equation you solved was the equation that was being presented. you recall that episone in married with children when christina applegate was saving cereal box K's to buy car ?
asciilifeform: mp_en_viaje: 'wtf, i solved apparent given equation, and this fella goes off re 'cuntlogics'..' != 'slide'
mp_en_viaje: nevermind what to disagree. stop sliding around all the time, it's like you have a cuntprocess in your head, the moment money starts being discussed you're suddenly an octopus on ice.
asciilifeform: imho poorly specified didactic problem tho, in orig thrd.
asciilifeform: this is when i admit that i dun think i have with what to disagree with mp_en_viaje
mp_en_viaje: (ioan voda caragea famous 1818s ruler, escaped to transylvania with his loot)
mp_en_viaje: well, broker more than breaks even. so he does have the caragea argument, "i'm trying to steal enough before they steal it back to take off"
asciilifeform: right. so per this extended model, even tho on paper broker 'breaks even', he is still chump, as e.g. lives in reich where usg can steal his brick castle on a whim
mp_en_viaje: man who makes 1mn a year on wall street has THE EXCUSE.
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, "if you're not making bank on wallstreet, you have no excuse to be there ; and even then, it's an excuse."
mp_en_viaje: but the fact that the man selling you a job is using some "unrelated" accolytes to collect the cost of job, and the fact man selling you job pretends he's collecting "rent" which is totally no cost of job makes no fucking difference. and the fact man selling you job tries to pretend you gotta buy it, to "have status", much like engagement ring salesmen try to pretend, also make no difference.
asciilifeform: ok, take the succesful broker, 1m/y in. that same brick house, 900k. what is output of algo ? ( per my reading of orig - 'not scam' ? )
mp_en_viaje: like a pair of shoes, which is WHAT THEY ARE. a job isn't who the fuck you are, a job is ~something you bought~. like a tv set or a couch.
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, yes, the discussion was aboout trying to help him evaluate jobs.
mp_en_viaje: and yes, this happens to be the two-pronged approach of socialism : tryina make the job about you, and tryna making the payment about something else.
asciilifeform: aite, so ~was~ strictly re the sums in given units ?
mp_en_viaje: if you lived off photosynthesis, the scamjob still stays a scamjob. because whether job is scam or not ~is about the job~. NOT about you, in any capacity.
mp_en_viaje: where you live makes no difference!!! for as long as "the job" is something which does not pay enough to buy ~house~, THEREFORE you pay to go. wherever you live, whatever your conditions.
asciilifeform: so , to expand this binomial, 'if yer living in cardboard, thereby you pay to go' ?
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, yes, this is the difference. job == where they pay you to go ; scamjob == where you pay to go there.
mp_en_viaje: i pointed out to you that this is not a valid response, you ~moved on to attacking me~. guess what, wehther i'm rich or poor, happy or unhappy, tall or short, it is STILL not valid to go into a discussion of 1+2 when i point out to you you did something stupid.
asciilifeform: there was 0 in orig thrd re genuine vs scam, read entirely as 'is yer 'job' in fact paying, or do you pay to go to it'
mp_en_viaje: this, IN TURN, is not a valid response.
mp_en_viaje: i pointed out to you that this is not something thinking man does, you went to argue that 1+1=2.
mp_en_viaje: this is an invalid basis for an intervention ; not something thinking man does.
mp_en_viaje: you intervened to point out that you live in a scamhouse.
mp_en_viaje: i was explaining to the inquiring mind how to price a supposed job : take an actual house, see what it costs, see how it figures against the supposed job. the process will illuminate whether it's a real job or a scam job.
mp_en_viaje: again from the top :
asciilifeform: possibly i dun follow the analogy. not pretending, swear.
mp_en_viaje: then got called on it, and instead of fixing the headgoange, went right into cuntmode.
mp_en_viaje: we were discussing a thing. you came up with some cuntlogic.
mp_en_viaje: what expand ? the expansion's afuckingbove.
mp_en_viaje: stop sliding over this sort of thing, because it's rotting your brain.
asciilifeform: plox to expand?
mp_en_viaje: now stop squirming about. there's no squirming about. you made a claim, which is false.
asciilifeform: funnily enuff iirc we had thread re literally whether one could ride 100 toy chopper
mp_en_viaje: this has been you, since you've been talking about money.
mp_en_viaje: then everyone : "so take it apart, reproduce the pieces on larger scale" ; alf : "oh noex, my toy choper can't be opened, it's magical"
mp_en_viaje: then everyone else : "so get a bunch of choppers, if one lifts a little a lot will lift a lot" alf : "oh noes, only can exist one, my toy chopper is magical"
mp_en_viaje: look at it : " incidentally fwiw the shack asciilifeform lives in , would cost ~2y of his pay to buy. but i ~dun want~ to buy it" === "my toy chopper DOES put MUCH MORE thrust than it weighs, but what of it, i can't ride it"
mp_en_viaje: this sort of idiocy has been the stock in trade of your non-technical contribution for the past ... soon to be a decade, holy shit!
asciilifeform: i read orig thrd as 'yer gulag dun even cover cost of barrack, they make you pay for barrack' but difficult to argue with 'scam house, scam job, and breathe scam air also', all of it is entirely tru
mp_en_viaje: are you actually unaware of this ?
mp_en_viaje: and you did not say "this is true of my toy chopper also". you said ~exactly the opposite~ : "my toy chopper DOES put MUCH MORE thrust than it weighs, but what of it, i can't ride it".
mp_en_viaje: mno. a : "here is job". b : "this job does not pay enough to buy house" ; a. "but shoebox also house" b : "your scamhouse doesn't make your scamjob a job"
asciilifeform: 'if rocket puts out less thrust than it weights, it dun go up' 'ok, this is true of my toy chopper also' 'idjit, i was speaking only of my moon lander, plebe'
mp_en_viaje: http://trilema.com/2013/the-wonder-of-inflation/#selection-77.0-77.49 << this being the general statement.
mp_en_viaje: to arrive at exposing the "oh, this also job, this also salary" fraud.
mp_en_viaje: precisely this sort of substitution, "oh, shoebox also house, hoofpaste also hamburger, etc" socialism is being rejected.
mp_en_viaje: yes.but cost ~of one of the actual houses~. NOT ~of such a hole as plebes might inhabit~
asciilifeform: mp_en_viaje: given example was specifically a ratio of 'cost' / 'budget' tho
mp_en_viaje: t'd take to buy a respective portion of the finite turkeys of the land.
a111: Logged on 2019-05-17 22:24 asciilifeform: incidentally fwiw the shack asciilifeform lives in , would cost ~2y of his pay to buy. but i ~dun want~ to buy it, why would i want to buy a decaying cardboard-an'-siding thing.
mp_en_viaje: http://btcbase.org/log/2019-05-17#1914454 << talking to you is often enough an exercise in "let's see what this intelligent but illiterate kid deliberately failed to notice in the source material / replaced with constructed story from head". house there linked built ~century ago, brick. specificaly because is not a matter of "what'd it take to buy rabbit-dwelling shoebox in which subjective rabbit lives". it's a matter of what i ☝︎
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, diplomats don't pay income taxes.
mod6: trinque: We'll get there.
trinque: I'd love to see a trb ebuild come of this mod6
mod6: Anyway, I'm gonna grab some food here. I'll work on a write up this weekend among other things. o7
mod6: Otherwise, the 'rotor.sh' and 'rotor_bitcoin_only.sh' are not actually utilized. So we could cut those loose too, if desired.
mod6: I hope I'm not doing anything redundant really. The Makefiles itself take care of the compilation of Boost/BDB/OpenSSL. The one thing that I still need from the rotor.tar.gz is 'openssl-004-musl-termios.patch'
asciilifeform: pretty substantial find, mod6 . ty for documenting.
mod6: I've taken notes, I'll write up something on my blog as soon as I can. Just wanted to share the progress here. Obv. bunch more testing, etc.
asciilifeform: at least seems to be the case for ada projs.
asciilifeform: ( previously thought that it ~always~ builds statics )
mod6: it does seem that way, ya.
asciilifeform: interesting, apparently ave1's demands 'disable-shared' in some yet-unknown case, to actually build static cppism
asciilifeform: i may be thick, but it is not evident from the patch
mod6: asciilifeform: I changed all of the CC, CXX, LD to point at all of the binaries located in the tarball I extracted from the build of Ave1's GNAT, like this one: /opt/20180924/x86_64-linux-musl-native/bin/gcc
asciilifeform: mod6: i see what you did, but under which gcc got the eggog ??