314300+ entries in 1.965s

malaimo: but
I guess if you consider regression to the mean satoshidice will be fine...
gesell: based on the S.DICE betcount total on Jan 1 and current count
I'm seeing a %14 increase in dividends. It's a simplistic calculation. Match what everyone else thinks or does someone have something more sound?
jurov: would you buy future for 1.7BTC that's covered only up to 1.95 ?
i doubt
jurov: (if
i inderstand idiffs correctly)
jurov:
i have sold 20x x.idiff.mar to bugpowder fellow for 1.7711 BTC
kakobrekla:
i showed that xdiff thingie to a guy with ~300ghash
jurov: when
i buy some and difficulty rises, when they'll go *poof*?
jurov: how do
i know how much is the cover?
Graet:
i'll read it laterm kids dinner time mircea_popescu
maximian:
I do anticipate that - it makes sense
mircea_popescu: actually
i imagine the largest single factor affecting price is people's judgement of how likely a sale to a large player is.
Bowjob:
I'd imagine with dice shares would plummet now that the whale got 9k in 1 day.
Bowjob:
I find it a bit strange that mpex dice shares haven't lost value while Havelock's are a bit down
kakobrekla:
i guess you could replace -- with 'shit'.
smickles:
i might be shadow-banned on reddit?
assbot:
I cooked,
I cleaned, and
I sewed, and
I have a right to get--
smickles: don't look at me,
i just leveraged long
mircea_popescu: bah
i stay up to write docs for miners, ppl sell mpoe. THIS IS THE THANKS
I GET!
kakobrekla: >>its also a good game choice
I think as its not totally trivial to create a bot for it.
kakobrekla:
i got one too, if we are talking about moms.
error4733:
i got one but
i'm not a fking hipsters
dub:
I thought duketogo was talking about the hipsters desire to be original by listening to obscure shit
Ukto:
I figured if they actually bought the tapes and had receipts
dub:
I think you mean 'hipsters'
Ukto:
i think teens would like em
Ukto:
I bet they would sell like hotcakes
error4733: hey, totally off topic, a friend made some wallet with old audio tape,
i found this awesome, so
i share ;)
Ukto: yeah, it was. [17:14] <pigeons>
i just spent 2 btc on btc-bond to learn how this works
Ukto: Namworld: sorry if
i misread that :)
burnside:
I think it was pigeons that said that he'd spent 2 BTC making trades to test Ukto's statements.
burnside:
I'd rather not end up with all this attention. But
I can't leave other users confused based on posts of a competing exchange operator. You of all people should be able to wrap your brain around that.
Ukto: you wanna defend yourself, then defend yourself to the people that
i outright lied to
Ukto:
I should have wrote "could"
Ukto:
i dont know whats possible
Ukto:
i get confused just as easily as others would
Ukto:
i use the same interface
Ukto:
i look for the same documentation to yoru custom stuff
Ukto: but
I am no different then another btct user
Ukto:
i will get you a list of all bitcoin related channels
Ukto:
i would have said "oh, let me check"
Ukto: Namworld: as
I said,
I was just ahving a discussion here on irc
Ukto: Namworld: yes,
i see that now
Ukto: Alright, so from now on when
I ask any questions about your site which does some very unconvential things w/o any supportive documentation,
i will create a new irc user
burnside:
I think we've come full circle: [15:00] <burnside> Ukto, just so we're clear. Anytime you post something that is incorrect, wrong, or misleading,
I'm going to post a follow up with the truth. If that bothers you,
I'm sorry, but it has to be done. If you don't want to be called a liar, then don't say definitively that something is true when it is not.
burnside:
I've made lots of mistakes, mostly in terms of getting sucked into petty bickering.
Ukto: as
I clicked through things
burnside: that may be, but
I don't think so.
I haven't made anything up about BitFunder and stated it as fact.
Ukto: except
I was just talking with a few friends
burnside:
I'll be honest,
I hold you to a higher standard. There was no simple mistake. What you stated was not true and you stated it clearly, intentionally, and in a way that damages the company.
Ukto: as
i said,
I was talking
Ukto:
i'll take my 35btc. ;)
Ukto: The withdraw page clearly, plainly, and simply says
I have 35.5btc available to withdraw. No further details.
Ukto:
I have 35.5 btc in my account,
I have a 35btc order up for a security right now.
burnside:
I don't say anything about bid depth or order depth on the market.
Ukto: When you withdraw or transfer it cancels your orders you can no longer afford. Plain. Simple. Effective.
I even have a display on the withdrawal page clearly showing the maximum you can withdraw without orders getting canceled -- AND, this behavior has been discussed to death in the btct/litecoinglobal threads.
burnside: [12:06] <Ukto> Regardless of 'pumping the numbers',
i think traders have a right to knwo that a bid is actually backed, and not just a fake number on the books.
burnside: [12:05] <Ukto> on btct,
I can fill my account with 100btc, put up to 100btc orders on each asset, and withdraw the 100btc
Ukto: and
I put in my reubutle it was based on what
I could see
Ukto: So in the end,
I told the truth, that you can set bids on a per asset basis, right?
pigeons:
i just spent 2 btc on btc-bond to learn how this works
Ukto:
I think, also to some degree, it misrepresents market size as well
Namworld: but evaluating one individually will always show an accurate orderbook and that's all
I care about.
Ukto: and how
I feel about it. :)
Namworld: yeah. Orderbook is true only for the asset you're currently looking at...
I don't see the problem with bids on other assets disappearing upon filling that orderbook
Ukto: as a trader,
I like to know that the books are there
Ukto: and now
I cant get what
I expected
Ukto:
i start with asset A
Ukto:
i look, and see hey, if
i sell 500 share sof each asset,
i should get X
Ukto: so say
I am dumping my shares of all my assets
pigeons: its not fake cause it cancels immediately
i agree, but also
i dont think its user friendly, shouldnt accept the order
Ukto: Namworld: so all 6 of my 5btc pids could instnatly be filled even tho
I have 20btc?
pigeons: sometimes you guestimate, if it lets me do it
i mathjed right, not here ;)
burnside:
I thought about that pigeons, but that's a ui issue where
I decided that the order they're placing should rank higher than orders they already had. (what they want to do NOW outranks what they wanted to do yesterday.)
Ukto:
I was saying that in my opinion
i feel its a lie to show X btc worth on the books when its not actually there
Ukto: but not what
I was going on about. :)
Ukto:
i never said same asset
Ukto: so if
I have 20btc, and put 6 5btc bids on assets
Ukto:
i cant force wsomeone to buy my shares.
burnside: The looking bad part
I think you accomplish just fine on your own.
burnside: Ukto, just so we're clear. Anytime you post something that is incorrect, wrong, or misleading,
I'm going to post a follow up with the truth. If that bothers you,
I'm sorry, but it has to be done. If you don't want to be called a liar, then don't say definitively that something is true when it is not.
Ukto: reminds me of when
I had my JAH shares on glbse, and rasta paid divs nightly, even though he only had to paid weekly.
Namworld: Bonuses
I give on BTC-BOND are a very small fraction of what
I make.
Namworld: yeah. Well
I had indeed made great profit trading options...
Ukto: Namworld: btw,
I think those bonus divs were a great use of the pre-timed payouts to get some sales.
I think it helped alot for getting shares out. :)