log☇︎
312000+ entries in 1.875s
Namworld: I am torn right now, by my will to secure a profit right away and how good ASICMINER seems to be turning out.
Namworld: I guess the competition will be an important impact
Namworld: If they stick around for at least a year mining and selling ASICs, I guess... more if they design new chips in the future.
Diablo-D3: Namworld: hahahaha I made the list short
pigeons: another one I wonder about is deepbit reclaimer asics where you buy the shares at icbit.se
Diablo-D3: Namworld: I made a bid
midnightmagic: pigeons: Originally, 200+ share owners for asicminer were planned to be able to trade-in and get an asicminer. I don't know what's happening with that deal these days.
Diablo-D3: well, let the games begin I guess
midnightmagic: On the bright side, I heard back from them and they told me that Icarus owners get to jump the line. :)
Diablo-D3: Bugpowder: I think closer to 2
Bugpowder: I think that is the max upside
Bugpowder: I would take it and run
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: I'm really hoping it's not that sensitive to heat. Because that would suck..
Diablo-D3: I think they did the fault detection shit wrong
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: I dont know why the reboots are happening
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: Their changes to cgminer I'm personally most interested in.
pigeons: i want an avalon
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: dude, I really doubt they made 2 fully functioning machines like that
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: Also, Yifu said the source would be published ages ago, but I don't see it.
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: I don't hear about anyone else receiving their units.
Namworld: If the others never ship, I'll be pissed.
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: anyhow, whatever. if numactl says its numa, its probably numa, and I was tired of this argument long before gmaxwell freaked out
pigeons: i thought you meant "consumer asic mining devices"
Namworld: I think my ASICMINER shares will be sold =/
Diablo-D3: Namworld: yeah, I think thats awesome
Diablo-D3: dont get me wrong, I wish more shit was numa aware
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: I dont consider mm northbridges
Namworld: Now that's what I'm talking about
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: yours I wouldnt doubt it has a weird layout
midnightmagic: I'm talking about the one I'm currently logged into.
midnightmagic: Ah, you're talking about your own machine, not the one I'm currently logged into right now.
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: I said 2 not 8.
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: and btw, that 8 core box I described, Im pretty sure it had a northbridge for the second ring
Diablo-D3: no, I thought moore was trolling me
midnightmagic: I don't know enough about that to meaningfully discuss it with you.
Diablo-D3: actually, I wonder if it does really qualify to be called that
Diablo-D3: yes, but I go by magnitudes
midnightmagic: I'm fairly sure that speed of memory access is the only qualifier.
midnightmagic: I know you don't log, but even in your scrollback, I'm fairly sure you can't find a quote from me where I asserted that.
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: thats not the way I interpreted that
midnightmagic: I'm fairly sure he's limited it to the definition of NUMA.
Diablo-D3: I'd hate to own that machine though
Diablo-D3: and I believe I also said that opterons with htx bridges are numa
midnightmagic: Except that I have a machine that AMD calls NUMA that I'm logged into right now.
Diablo-D3: I dont, I just dont like people claiming anything with more than one socket is numa
Diablo-D3: same reason I said some older 8 socket boards might appear as numa
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: I think I know why it has numa enabled
Diablo-D3: weird, I wonder whats wrong with it
midnightmagic: No that's the machine I'm currently logged into right now.
Diablo-D3: yes, I already pasted that in the other channel
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: yes, that statement does not conflict with anything I said
Diablo-D3: if it said 24 cores, you could possibly argue that if I didnt already know better
midnightmagic: Admit that the PDF I linked is talking about a single box!
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: They've been around for years. I have been personally benchmarking them for years.
midnightmagic: Right, I am logged into a machine right now with 32 cores, and it's just one machine.
burnside: I think they're confused. Shoulda been btcto.ca. ;)
Chilca: I don't have more money to buy more!!
jcpham: i call paradox
jcpham: <ProfMac> -hustler I started at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=124441.0 I used pgp, and have not yet registered a BTC address. I don't know if I have to re-authenticate each login or not. There is a lot of info to assimilate, and I'm not there yet.
maximian: some other non-US controlled TLD I should say
maximian: If this uncertainty didn't exist, I wouldn't care if the share price was 0.0001, because I could be confident that I'd extract dividends for years
evoorhees: so that's what I'm in the process of exploring
maximian: I have a feeling your lawyer is going to say "you're doing WHAT?!"
evoorhees: I think that's the most important thing right now
evoorhees: would be bad for my investors if I got it super popular only to have it shut down
evoorhees: I'll figure out some excellent marketing for it, but not until I've gotten some good legal advice on how to protect this thing
evoorhees: honestly it's getting way more marketing than I want, currently
truffles: cant find any other examples i forum too much
ThickAsThieves: heh, if i google "gamble online" first return is "FBI — Online Gambling Is Illegal"
truffles: i get to voice my dislike here
truffles: def puts me on the spot, i visit a lotta shit websites lol
evoorhees: yeah I want example
truffles: i do..
ThickAsThieves: I don't mind the current website
ThickAsThieves: i could do respectable graphics, but no I can't help with vid
evoorhees: well actually - I only want someone to do a vid if that person is really experienced with it.
truffles: to write a script i would need to know what it was about..
ThickAsThieves: I could probably record the voiceover in my studio if I had a script
ThickAsThieves: I do graphics and some sound design, no video though
truffles: can i have video veto power?
ThickAsThieves: that's the first thing i tried to do
ThickAsThieves: yeah, i do think the POV is, teach gamblers about bitcoin thru sdice, not the reverse
ThickAsThieves: i also dont care about whales
DeadWeasel: i haven't even seen it since the revamp
evoorhees: I'd rather be marketing the game
evoorhees: I think we all know how easily people dump money into unsubstantiated "opportunities" in bitcoin
ThickAsThieves: at this point i'm more interested in dice players than investors
evoorhees: I don't want to make the asset frothy
evoorhees: no I'm saying I don't want to do that
evoorhees: I'd rather it sit just below market value, than puff up a bubble with some marketing tricks int he presentation
evoorhees: I don't want to puff it up
DeadWeasel: I've seen you in videos and on interviews, you can talk the talk.
evoorhees: but, I don't want to be marketing the s.dice asset over and above what it's legitimately worth, if that makes sense
evoorhees: I'm a marketing guy, so i understand that
evoorhees: no I agree, you're absolutely right about that
DeadWeasel: but those with BTCs already might. I think there needs to be a cleaner version of your monthly profit and associate dividends.
evoorhees: oh haha I don't think those people will be bying s.dice shares anytime soon
Bugpowder: I thought .0062 would sell through though
evoorhees: it's okay, at the end of the day if they don't sell I get the dividends
topace: Diablo-D3: i beg to differ