304800+ entries in 2.156s

jcpham:
i'm doing much better in the poll today
kakobrekla: oh
i read that "in summary the coinbase is defenetly useful" and got a heart attack almost
mod6:
i'd love to take the time to audit that shit, but who wants to fight with LukeJr and the others?
jurov: but maybe
i'm just crazy, going into anything
jurov: mod6 good for ya.
i did touch it and it didn't hurt.
mod6: so
i'll just my retard ass out of there
mod6:
i never wanted to touch bitcoin's client or anything else because the #bitcoin-dev is filled with pompus retards
mod6:
i dunno,
i guess
i'd have to spend some time in there. and the client needs to be combed through
MJR_:
I think a central clearing corp, that only needs to transfer the diff between exchanges will be the best way
MJR_:
I can't remember your exact quote mircea_popescu but something like "if you want to use crypto currency but don't understand cryptography..."
MJR_:
I think bitcoin-assets is the bleeding edge of the bleeding edge
MJR_:
I think it's multicast tcp?
MJR_:
I wrote a program to monitor how often we need to fail over to TCp for our data feeds
mod6: any thoughts on that? anyone know what
I'm referring to?
MJR_: but also...
I really think node and branch will be needed
mircea_popescu: mod6 one of the key reasons why
i keep the code closed.
MJR_:
I really think a gpg based order system would be nice
MJR_: anyway
I think there is a ton of room for competition to mt gox
mircea_popescu: usure ? cause
i wrote about this and iirc shrem was saying btc
MJR_:
I meant the bitcoin exchanges
pizzaman1337: well, there must be some info on it somewhere that
I could get access too
pizzaman1337: so what is the "proper" way to run an exchange? where can
I read about this?
MJR_: well...last
I checked there was only one exchange that hasn't been hacked
mod6:
i got trolled so hard by my gf for this shit yesterday
mod6:
i don't think im smart enough for this stuff.
MJR_: well, again
I think that could happen on a larger scale...
mircea_popescu: Mar 11 09:19:14 <mod6> think
i just need to add some sleep time....
mod6:
i was thinking about the gox issue...
mod6:
i couldn't possibly remember them all
mircea_popescu: pigeons
i fear it'll take me a little to digest this one
mircea_popescu: this is possibly the worst case of "hi
i am calling to report a bug" bungled tech support ever.
pigeons: "If anyone has any idea how
I can buy a large amount of bitcoins please message me. The largest amount
I can buy from bitinstant is $500 worth ive looked and looked and its near impossible to make a large bitcoin purchase anywhere."
pigeons: "if
I was a scammer
I could be living it up easy some place warm instead of braving the same upstate new york winters
I have been for 30+ years"
pigeons: today
I downloaded .7 and have been patiently waiting for my blockchain to download, im not sure if
I will continue refunds or just buy a big crack rock and smoke it in a cave some where but
I am totally offended by this scammer tag
imsaguy:
I am one of the unidentifieds
ThickAsThieves:
i'm just stuck on meta thoughts lately,
i think its lack of sleep
imsaguy: but
I don't know how often it updates
smickles: where's the statics on what version people are running,
i think there are a bunch still on .3
imsaguy:
I'm not advocating they do this
mircea_popescu: once
i get the rest online, can you measure the lag for the entire $proxies list ?
mircea_popescu: mpex could trade on beenz if
i wanted to, it's completely btc agnostic.
smickles: benkay:
i could have it place an order, to test, but the problem would be cancelling that order later
ThickAsThieves: so
i know they me seem ignorant, but just thinking out loud, is there not a way to make the bitcoin software part of the blockchain itself?
mircea_popescu: and incidentally,
i wonder what OTHER exploits are there for berkley
Namworld: No,
I mean malicious stuff from knowing ahead of time about a fork.
jborkl_:
I like Death and Taxes response
Namworld:
I think being heavily dependant on miners is actually what Satoshi wanted... miners vote with their hashing power... That's exactly how the system is supposed to work.
Namworld: Only bob
I know around these parts.
Namworld: If it was a written text,
I might make less omissions. When chatting tho,
I type fast and usually omit things.
Namworld:
I think you are very literal on what sentences mean and interpret as little as possible. You avoid making too many inferences during a conversation so even small omissions can result in misunderstandings.
MJR_: has anyone ever said "bitcoin-assets is great but
I just wish it had as much drama as bitcointalk.com"
imsaguy:
I'm glad
I'm not almost everyone else
Namworld: Almost all misunderstandings on Bitcoin IRC are with you.
I usually go about quite well with almost everyone else.
Namworld: Actually
I find you go about things in a different way than anyone else...
mircea_popescu:
i enjoy arguing with him mostly because he seems to go about things in a totally different way than anyone else
Namworld: That's new.
I don't recall that.
Namworld:
I hate it when
I forget something in a sentence and
I'm getting argued against for 10 minutes when
I have the same point of view as the one arguing against me.
Namworld: mircea:
I was referring to testing of .8 alone.
I'm made an omission in it.
I've been trying to correct myself for like the last few minutes =/
Namworld:
I'm talking about people making such claims... not about me making the same claims =/
Namworld: THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT
I'M FUCKING CLAIMING THAT THE ISSUE AIN'T ON .8!
smickles: personall,
i include previous version interaction in the testing of one version
Namworld: This is the only thing
I'm trying to say.
jborkl_: Yeah, me too-
I don't like being the first to change- bit me too many times
Namworld: Don't you get it?
I'm trying to refute people who think the issue is with .8 and that .8 alone should have been tested more...
MJR_: Namworld:
I think what they mean is that part of testing a new release is testing it's interactions with other versions for backward compatiblity
mircea_popescu: jborkl_
i've always been slow to upgrade, specifically for lack of faith.
smickles: Namworld:
i believe they do test for interaction with older versions
jborkl_:
I just solo mined on .72 again last night until it was all figured out-
I knew
I kept .72 around and running for a reason
Namworld:
I know... but people everywhere say that .8 should have been tested more so the issue would have been found.
Namworld:
I'm not saying it couldn't have been found,
I'm just refuting that doing more testing on .8 would have given any result.