log☇︎
300400+ entries in 0.216s
asciilifeform: i shit thee not, this is the actual law in usa since '50s
mircea_popescu: i wonder if the logs will end up classified now also.
mircea_popescu: and since it's gas-based, prolly heated by means of the gas being a neutron poison. xenon.
asciilifeform: the H-bomb. It symbolizes the banality of evil which is the essence of the whole H-bomb business. Workaday people doing workaday jobs building doomsday machines based on 1950's technology, while civilization marches bravely into the new millennium, oblivious to the death sentence imposed by a secret technology involving plastic foam. It calls to mind the most famous line from The Graduate, "One word: plastics."'
asciilifeform: Errata, which I dubbed "exploding styrofoam," the corresponding phrase would be "a gas of electrons." The implosion of the secondary is driven by matter pressure, not radiation pressure. Incidentally, Dow Chemical complained that Styrofoam is a trademark, like Xerox, and that nuclear weapons do not contain Styrofoam. Point conceded; the foam is generic. ... I like the idea of a nuisance material, plastic foam, as the real secret of
asciilifeform: 'In the one-page Errata in the December 1979 issue, I explained that the turkey in the oven is a plastic "channel filler" which captures x-ray energy and explodes with enormous force, purely as the result of getting very hot very fast (ten million degrees in half a microsecond). In the original H-bomb article, I had described the conditions inside the radiation channel in terms of "a gas of photons." For my revised explanation in the
mircea_popescu: you know what the literary model for this is ?
asciilifeform: because they are annoying.
asciilifeform: specifically to cut off the parnassus.
asciilifeform: and recall how it is my profession to cut things ?
asciilifeform: can be taught - technology. 'must be aryan, and live on mt. parnassus' - magic.
mircea_popescu: how familiar you are with making axes vs making aerogels does not establish if making axes or making aerogels is "magic", it just establishes how familiar you are with them.
asciilifeform: but this is still quite apart from 'my anal telepathy muscles are ineffable and stfu finance made progress'
mircea_popescu: soon enough you're going to re-discover post-structuralism at this rate, and end up understanding what i meant by context above.
mircea_popescu: then the design is for a magic item
mircea_popescu: but if the "purpose" of the axe (as you imagine it) is unspoken part of the design,
asciilifeform: (heads, trees, ...)
asciilifeform: but on the other hand if he knows that it is to cut heads with.
asciilifeform: this would happen if he lived in some heavenly vacuum where the purpose of the axe is entirely unclear
mircea_popescu: the same sort of thought process is involved (for him) when he decides to make the axe at all and when he decides to make singlespoked flanged mace.
mircea_popescu: even your "primitive man won't stray" argument is broken, as you stop midway. a) the point of his following your recipe is that he got off lazy butt ; if he doesn't, he doesn't AT ALL. why would he get off lazy butt JUST AS FAR as you imagine he would and no further ?
asciilifeform: (communicate to intergalactic whateverthefucks)
asciilifeform: i would have a bit of a tougher cookie on my hands
asciilifeform: well yes, if i were in the position of the hero of that one asimov story where he is trying to communicate what humans look like over radio, but he has no idea even which way their displays scan, or what the hell they use to decode signal in the first place,
mircea_popescu: not even the fucking axe is "fully technologized"
mircea_popescu: (note how you keep trying to brace yourself against unstated convention, "of course you would understand this is not the item because that'd breach symmetry and we have a convention re symmetry")
asciilifeform: hard enough to give a stone 1 edge.
asciilifeform: at any rate, 'resistance of medium', this is not a place where a primitive axe-maker is likely to wander into
mircea_popescu: wasn't clear that part is intentionally meaningful. fine, consider same item with a single such spoke
mircea_popescu: but you communicated axe and i ended up with a flanged mace. http://www.therionarms.com/reenact/therionarms_c1306b.jpg << is this your axe ?
mircea_popescu: name one item that is not in this situation.
mircea_popescu: but this is universally the case.
asciilifeform: but in fact the would-be maker still needs the right unobtainium
asciilifeform: when you ~think~ you have reduced the item to a recipe of dead words
mircea_popescu: what is this "Failed technologizing" mean ?
asciilifeform: i was specifically citing example of failed technologizing
mircea_popescu: (think about it - dead words failed to convey it. in spite of everyone's best effort)
mircea_popescu: but the implications for your position are pretty lulzy, wouldn't you say ?
asciilifeform: anyway i was not there, and cannot say how much the entire story was simply a cover for embezzling half a bil usd
asciilifeform: and eventually had to reverse-engineer old samples and found the missing 'gotta have trace elements x, y, z'
mircea_popescu: so this was a technology yes
asciilifeform: but ~no longer~ present in 2000s when they resumed production
mircea_popescu: ah and they can't make it now ?
asciilifeform: as it turned out to have a hidden dependence on an impurity which was present in the feedstock at the time
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: story is, the particulars of making just-that (and it had to be just-that, on account of the detonation process) foam, were never fully written down
trinque: mircea_popescu: yeah we can work that out too
mircea_popescu: so what's lost here ? very thin foams are well understood
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: good evidence that it was indeed a product
mircea_popescu: i always thought it to be a sort of snipe pee.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform ah that's an actual thing ?
mircea_popescu: trinque were you also going to give him deedbot log access ?
mircea_popescu: gotta get the logsearch already.
mircea_popescu: which incident is this ?
mircea_popescu: repeatable is one thing ; but your idea of communicable is murky at best.
asciilifeform: (recall the 'fogbank' incident ?)
asciilifeform: in that sense, much of what we think of as technology, has not in fact yet been technologized.
mircea_popescu: but that's not what you said :)
asciilifeform: it has to be communicable via dead words.
mircea_popescu: anwyay, there's not so much difference between what we're saying. "make it repeatable" as you say is part of parcel of "economy of scale" as i say.
mircea_popescu: well, they look the same, should be good enough for our technological needs :D
asciilifeform: well the damascene pattern is there. but no, i did not personally buy these swords and go back in time to 14th c and fight with them for 20y
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform there's not much to go on when one believes there's more substance than marketing to that "damascus" claim.
asciilifeform: to technologize is to break apart magic and make it repeatable - e.g., damascus steel was magic (gotta be in the right time, right place, use iron from here-and-here, and whisper the incantations yer grandfather taught you for good measure, and be of pure aryan blood, and ....) but then somebody builds mass spectrometer and today you can buy a damascus knife from helsinki
mircea_popescu: to take a simple illustration : make this matchstick exactly 1 mn thick within 0.1% tolerance throughout it's length and i'll pay you a dollar is hard. make this rod of molybdenum 1 mm thick within 0.0000001% tolerance and i'll pay you a billion is easy.
mircea_popescu: and by this measure, a good chunk of what you regard one is really the other and back again.
mircea_popescu: in fact, a useful heuristic to distinguish magic and technology, is that as the stakes increase, magic gets harder and technology easier to do.
a111: Logged on 2016-05-19 15:51 asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-05-19#1468573 << i'ma bite this bait. tell me, what constructive thing have improvements in finance in past 30y enabled ?
asciilifeform: thus far thread seems to compress to a very discouraging http://btcbase.org/log/2016-05-19#1468598 ; mircea_popescu: 'me an' the other wizards got vastly moar powerful!1111' asciilifeform: 'waiwut how' mircea_popescu: 'yer puny brain will never apprehend the smallest part of it' ☝︎
mircea_popescu: and the day choir.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform well the problem with this choir is that it's made of apparent 16 yo girls who spend the night doing all manner of kinky stuff
asciilifeform: but on the other hand it is not wholly impossible to write something meaningful and useful re mathematical creativity.
mircea_popescu: or what, you think he was anti-talented ?
asciilifeform: if mircea_popescu is going into 'mathematical creativity has never been and likely will never be technologized' he is preaching to choir.
mircea_popescu: recall the example of the esteemed mr shockley, for instance.
mircea_popescu: but if it's actually useful to do, it can't fucking be done worth a shit.
mircea_popescu: then you can say like the butcher that moved into village and introduced hygiene, "i am a better surgeon than the guys in paris"
mircea_popescu: it's not surprisingly easy to do it usefully. it's very easy to do it when no one's doing it and there's a lot of low hanging fruit,
mircea_popescu: it's a technology, right ? by ytour notions of tech, math is the supertech. so then ?
asciilifeform: ^ this is surprisingly easy
mircea_popescu: but try it prospectively, like a math teacher on a grad program. pick which kids do good work and which waste their lives.
mircea_popescu: see, it's easy enough in retrsopect, to confound historical accident and meaning.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform and how do you distinguish the theorems for which he WILL BE famous from the ones for which he will not be ?
asciilifeform: erdos cannot teach me to be erdos but can write down the theorems.
asciilifeform: and yes, circus weight lifter has strength and he cannot teach the strength
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform yes, but not to all :) to selected gurlz.
mircea_popescu: it is, to a degree and after a fashion, a talent.
asciilifeform: iirc mircea_popescu routinely taught it to the gurlz
mircea_popescu: i use "technology" to describe my numeric head-mathing, though most gurlz can't do it.
asciilifeform: that is is useful to distinguish the 2 ?
mircea_popescu: and why is that ?
asciilifeform: however genuine his talent.
asciilifeform: but if mircea_popescu is a gifted telepath, clairvoyant, and spirit-summoner and proposes to use 'technology' to describe his abilities, imho this is abuse of terminology.
mircea_popescu: point in fact, most of what you do is not communicable to "filthy white man". though from what you're saying i take it next you go renting you'll rouse them from their beds to teach lisp ?
asciilifeform: and yeah in some jungle there is witch doctor whose wonderful spirit-summoning tech is not communicable to the filthy white man.
mircea_popescu: haha no. until then technology MAY be communicable.
asciilifeform: but until then technology is a communicable thing.
asciilifeform: quite possibly tomorrow we https://xkcd.com/298 .
asciilifeform: 'ain't no magic on this here planet' is a religious proposition, yes.
mircea_popescu: and how do you know this ? other than, it happening to be your religion.
asciilifeform: then unless the trick requires cunt muscles i can duplicate it.