log☇︎
278600+ entries in 0.156s
asciilifeform: PeterL: most orc folk use transliteratrons of one kind or another.
asciilifeform: PeterL: phf i think might have a genuine cyrillic kbd somewhere
PeterL: nevermind, was supposed to be joke
asciilifeform: PeterL: they differ like the letters on my keyboard differ from yours.
PeterL: protons differ, that is how NMR/MRI works
mircea_popescu: they do. they're the protons of the cancer cell.
asciilifeform: rather than at protons of cancer cell, because you get the notion that they differ from regular protons in your garden.
asciilifeform: you will look at the ~relevant~ zoom level.
asciilifeform: overall i agree with 'folks dumbly copy, paste, dun think things through'
mircea_popescu: you WILL look at the fucking bit values
mircea_popescu: obviously, if you'e looking at a picture of snatch, catlols etc, best to scroll through. if you are trying to decide if there is or is not a nuclear base there ; a cancer cell there, etc
asciilifeform: wake me up when there is any support for this hypothesis.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i am willing to state that the reason nobody discovered anything interesting since the 90s or so is because they haven't.
asciilifeform: PeterL: you may have missed mega-thread earlier , where mircea_popescu suggested that the pictures are unnecessary because the textual representation is possible.
mircea_popescu: maybe i'm using that as a thinking support. which i usually am.
mircea_popescu: PeterL depends man. if i am involved in a process of trying to understand something, which may take many hours to many months, that i am saved five minutes for a typing out is not necessarily useful.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: my point was that everyone who worked in chemistry in any capacity since '90s or so, has used it, but no one works WITH it on paper or in head !
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you wilfully ignore the benefit this exercise has for thinking.
PeterL: its like trying to see a picture by looking at the bit values, works better if you have a program draw it out for you
asciilifeform: and yes you can close rings, etc. but it rapidly turns into a regexp-like monster.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform fu you're not to speak for humans! PeterL sure, and most people only write html by clicking on buttons. but i like to type my shit out.
PeterL: I only use it by drawing the structure and having it generate the SMILES, which can be, E.G. pasted into another program
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: it's ~only use is to key in structures from journals, and to keep'em in db
asciilifeform: PeterL: aha, i had this! in chemgroup's 'MOE'
mircea_popescu: but mind, i wasn't seriously proposing this be used ; just ad-hoc showing that it can be.
a111: Logged on 2016-07-20 14:34 mircea_popescu: i'm even amenable to saying ::oc/C-COH-C::
PeterL: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-07-20#1507007 << are you familliar with the SMILES system of notation? ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://trilema.com/2012/blutjunge-verfuhrerinnen/ < for the rophone.
deedbot: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066852/ << Blutjunge Verführerinnen (1971) - IMDb | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rgTKczaris << Blutjunge Verfuhrerinnen 197 - YouTube | http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068298/ << Blutjunge Verführerinnen 3. Teil (1972) - IMDb
mircea_popescu: i'd rather use hoare - hor if forced to do something with it.
asciilifeform: no worse than 'she-wolf'
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform and yes but it drives stupidity such as chomsky's rank nonsense about "what is gramatical". if you recall that recently linked essay.
mircea_popescu: how do i humorously say "male whore" as in, "curv", which is the never-seen but PERFECTLY GRAMMATICAL masculine of curva, whore ?
mircea_popescu: anyway. fucking javascript of a language if i ever saw one, this english thing. how do you people live ?
mircea_popescu: part of the problem is obviously that english is a language spoken by idiots, and it shows. but this isn't a large part and certainly not the largest part - i was doing the same thing in romanian. arguably much worse - people don't realise romanian is ALSO mostly spoken by idiots.
mircea_popescu: drives people up the walls.
mircea_popescu: trinque anyway, trilema is a foremost example of "i have my set of defintions and you likely don't know what they are ; nor will likely figure it out through a whole article - shit's too fine."
asciilifeform: it is not the sword from norse saga, won't fight by itself.
mircea_popescu: i think we're sitting on a poorly understood oilpatch.
mircea_popescu: which is by itself an achievement which dwarfs the accomplishments of the entire current genewration of anthropologists and kinda takes my breath away.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you know ? it's actuallty much huger than originally realised ; v is actually a model of knowledge in the general sense.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform my shirt was weaved out of virgin tears tho!
mircea_popescu: (cycle kind 1 : when your definitions can be forced into a cycle by changing contexts ; cycle kind 2 : when your definitions can be forced into a cycle by changing spot in time)
asciilifeform: trinque: no redefinitions involved. i run'em. what's the problem.
mircea_popescu: is not a thing, no matter what it pretends), but it must have no cycles in it.
mircea_popescu: trinque the thing is that you're perfectly allowed to use your own, consistent definitions, even if they may contradict "the common sense" ; provided that a) they are consistent ~and stable enough so as not to change by context~ and b) you're capable of expliciting them on request and this will not contradict previous construction. ie - you may have any graph you wish (chiefly because anyone does anyway, "community consensus"
trinque: worth probably also giving n00bs the holy truth beating and leaving redefining english to shakespeare
asciilifeform: shinohai: 1 per box at a time..
trinque: nothing wrong with that; I was saying the same yesterday
shinohai: Kind of imagined you meant plural of viruses there. ☟︎
trinque: there's a pragmatic distinction here between "this is a statement of holy truth" and "this shovel is currently doubling as guillotine in a pinch"
a111: Logged on 2016-07-20 15:43 phf: so i push back on the guy, rme says "let's change subject", within minutes guy goes "it's late here i gotta go to sleep"
mircea_popescu: you're "men with jobs, jerry! and secretaries!" whereas average http://btcbase.org/log/2016-07-20#1507131 has one stale pizza box and one pizza stained tshirt. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform hey, they keep thinking "mp has one suit", so why not.
asciilifeform: shinohai: malware in the general case.
asciilifeform: i might not even be able to catalogue what else.
asciilifeform: incidentally i might not even ~know~ all of the assumptions which some luser somewhere might read into the text. mircea_popescu reminds me that most of'em probably think 'he has 1 computer, and 1 lan'
mircea_popescu: check out all the unexpected trouble one can stir up out of entirely left field dao.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu has a point here, but i did consider 'run' to have been explained eons ago, when i publicly described my profession.
mircea_popescu: the latter is how ambitious if incompetent lawyers lose 90% of the cases they lose.
asciilifeform: (why? nfi, maybe they are in jail)
asciilifeform: even if it turns out that most folks do.
mircea_popescu: it's one thing to do this like i do it on trilema ; but it's another to do it in the face of contention.
asciilifeform: just like i take a shit, you should not assume that i did it in same room i sleep and eat in.
mircea_popescu: which is culpable, seeing how the entire argument there hinged on the definition of number 2.
asciilifeform: neh simply forgot to explain that i 'redefined number 2'
mircea_popescu: "everyone is welcome to substitute it randomly" ?
mircea_popescu: what, you're talking ascii ?
mircea_popescu: well no, but your assumption that you making a general statement will be taken as made rather than modified ad-hoc is not only unwarranted, but actually contrary to your declared preference.
asciilifeform: i suppose my assumption that ~everyone~ has distinct 'circles of hell' for running proggies, is baseless
mircea_popescu: hey, i'm not the one sprouting spurious absolutes, which is why i'm not the one with this problem. what picture.
asciilifeform: picture i were to run a pesticide shop
a111: Logged on 2016-06-30 15:38 asciilifeform: trinque: fact remains, if you think i'm gonna run a binary, ANYONE's binary, for whatever reason, yer smoking dope.
asciilifeform: have entire room of machines devoted to same.
asciilifeform: used to do it, for a living, even.
asciilifeform: i have nfi what, then, is a niche.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform in dispute is not the ownership part, but the niche part. it's not a niche!
a111: Logged on 2016-07-20 15:48 phf: well, they don't realize anything changed. decade ago a newbie was younger version of you, today with some chance a newbie might still be a younger version of you, but much more likely it's a person who never knew you had to wash hands after bathroom there purely to turn everything that you've built to shit
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-07-20#1507141 << this "newbie was an earlier version of you" never fucking happened in reality. it was just the fashionable hash for the pipe the wikipedia-generation idiots were smoking. ☝︎
asciilifeform: ida is the example of 'sole inhabitant of niche'
mircea_popescu: well then most of them will be "tivo software owns tivo niche"
trinque: runs great on wine too; I ran it there longer than on winderz
mircea_popescu: for as long as this "music library" thing was a thing, winamp was the thing for it.
mircea_popescu: winamp is prolly the best example of niche owner.
phf: asciilifeform: you can get winamps of some vintage that still run on recent windows machines
mircea_popescu: one of my secret lulz, for all the extra holes apple gets in here, nobody goes "stfu winamp"
asciilifeform: and win95 to go with it ?
mircea_popescu: the space between not getting laid and noticing you're not getting laid is short. the space from the noticing to the fixing however...
asciilifeform: not same. total war, you can declare.. alone.
a111: Logged on 2016-07-20 15:43 asciilifeform: i dun get why more folks won't declare total war.
asciilifeform: sorta like going from 'bic' lighter to flint.
phf: there was a pleasant notion of ownership with xmms, your playlist becomes an organic thing with a state, with most listened artists at the top, sequences organically created that align with your personal feel for harmony, etc. without bringing that whole aspy ocd file management into the equation. can't really do it with cli.
asciilifeform: just as you cannot have a theatre that is also a dairy farm
phf: "oh your carefully annotated rip of late 80s punk tape of misc artists is all different artists. let me helpfully spawn a folder per track for you. a cover art scan? kek!"
asciilifeform: its continuation as whatever going concern is incompatible with their presence
phf: it's kind of funny that xmms got "replaced" with various itunes clones. i had at various points a very large partially pirated, partially salvaged, partially ripped collection of music and i'm convinced that there's nothing better than an fs level folder structure for managing music.
asciilifeform: or consider the contortions you must go through, to build geda
phf: also culture was gutted. it was acceptable to be an asshole a decade ago, now flaming someone on irc is equivalent of voting for trump.
phf: well, they don't realize anything changed. decade ago a newbie was younger version of you, today with some chance a newbie might still be a younger version of you, but much more likely it's a person who never knew you had to wash hands after bathroom there purely to turn everything that you've built to shit ☟︎
asciilifeform: count, merely, the software packages that CANNOT BE USED today, that worked fine decade ago