275700+ entries in 0.107s
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform custom pacemakers have been the norm for not-poor people for what, 20 years ?
mircea_popescu: jurov anyway, you should prolly apply, then you can sue for unfair treatment
mircea_popescu: Naphex problem being they also want to do it for free, but mayhap there's a solution for that.
mircea_popescu: jurov: prolly i can be never classified to work with usg sekrets <<< you saw i lolled at the "medical devices" part yes ? :D
mircea_popescu: "On the balance of probabilities this would seem the most likely outcome, strictly because history unerringly flows in that direction which most cruely rapes the “average person”."
mircea_popescu: Yet another one of them is that consumers revolt, entrepreneurs intervene, before the end of 2015 there’s about a thousand to a million different Bitcoin forks, each with its ten million-ish monetary base worth about a dollar, on global average. The size of the inter-Bitcoins market, the complexity and confusion ensuing makes pretty much everything unmanageable for the “ordinary person”
mircea_popescu: Naphex: a enterprise node, hook into trusted bitcoin core nodes over P2p protocol. Index and cache the data << this is not a bad idea.
mircea_popescu: chicks the fucking definition of "here, i found this model passed out in the bathroom"
mircea_popescu: wait mikayla believes mila jovovich is NOT a carbon copy and unique ?!
mircea_popescu: actually you'll hear hell from people trying to pretend that this is the right way, and pgp is XYZ FUDstuffs even today.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform anon is permitted to hold copyright by bern convention, actually.
mircea_popescu: <punkman> I've also thought of signing the "lite" bundles << seems redundant. sign once, which you do, with the tx.
mircea_popescu: the result is a very cruel mistreatment of human soft tissue.
mircea_popescu: well, to be generous, it's not the voice that's the problem. it's the god awful pretense that one can understand things by guessing what words might mean "in context"
mircea_popescu: just, a medieval institution, arguably inadequate for modern times.
mircea_popescu: mentally compare the difference between an estate owned by nobody and commons
mircea_popescu: of course, us shitshow would reject this, but it's a perfectly valid approach.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform actually, satoshi was smart here. an anon holding copyright means that nobody else can claim it, and it can never be enforced.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform well, we can't. to remove them they'd have to at first somehow been included.
mircea_popescu: lol look at that, reddit asks for bitcoin foundation to remove satoshi from its rolls, the fucktards react by removing satoshi from the bitcoin code they're raping.
mircea_popescu: jurov yes, but i myself can also take it away, and have, and will, if the person's obnoxious.
mircea_popescu: <undata> but to what end, then? << you seen miller's crossing ?
mircea_popescu: well, like sex is no longer fashionable so the girl will claim she was "raped", just so the visit by two state employees to confiscate some contraband is called a "raid"
mircea_popescu: undata obama finished the reorganisation of everthing law enforcement as a homeland security sub.
mircea_popescu: so the person in question can be charged with conspiracy "?
mircea_popescu: once it disappears, irrespective of what the usg propaganda machine claims, it's happened.
mircea_popescu: the law can not compel one to lie, and so as long as that statement appears, it's not happened
mircea_popescu: no, the way these things work is the company has a firm negative statement published. "we have not been approached to so and so".
mircea_popescu: this comic font business is neither passive nor unavoidable
mircea_popescu: for something to be a canary it has to be a passive, unavoidable mechanism.
mircea_popescu: but they'd be legally forbidden from stopping hitting that button.
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo i fail to get how this is supposed to be a canary.
mircea_popescu: magic numbers are all equal. if 99.999999% of bitcoin were destroyed as you describe, the remainder coupla hundred btc will play the role of twenty million
mircea_popescu: <TheNewDeal> perhaps, or it's not worth anything to anyone any more << that's pure nonsense.
mircea_popescu: <decimation> at least, that's my understanding, would like to know if it's incorrect. << there's other ways to verify too, but this one definitely works.
mircea_popescu: <PeterL> are you familiar with the deedbot? << exactly.
mircea_popescu: but if you're trying to prevent the asshole from getting resources, why even consider the matter, just ignore it.
mircea_popescu: but you gotta decide which line you're going. inasmuch as it keeps the asshole from getting resources, yes it's better than giving him bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: TheNewDeal well, would you say that the best way to help your poor neighbour is to burn some soup ?
mircea_popescu: <TheNewDeal> do you think that's true? << no, it's stupid.
mircea_popescu: "We also need to find the sender's address, so we know where to send the money. This is done by looking at the inputs of the original transaction. The transaction can have multiple inputs that are all under the control of the sending party. We just send everything back to one of the input addresses at random."
mircea_popescu: you mean where private first class amanda stole all the data ?
mircea_popescu: anyway, in this particular case the best rebuttal is letting the guy do whatever he does after "setting sights"
mircea_popescu: maybe we should just publish a schematic, help these dumbasses self-rebutt