27400+ entries in 0.488s
mircea_popescu: conceivably the technology improved since the 70s, but anyway. i like pills, they give the girls proper hormonal cycles. why shouldn'
t she pms ?
a111: Logged on 2017-03-17 12:46 mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-03-17#1628626 << i don'
t see this at all. if you fuck a woman "normally" and she's not on the pill, you will obtain 8 kids in 10 years. you will also obtain an extremely shriveled woman, because like it or not females are essentially the cotyledon of children. biology is merciless and the ultimate empire, it dun care one whit your girl is smart and pleasant and worships you, it just cares to push o
a111: Logged on 2017-03-17 07:21 davout: in other TRB news, my node is happily bitcoining, doesn'
t seem too bothered by working with a regular HDD, and that's without asciilifeform's cache patch
a111: Logged on 2017-03-17 06:08 trinque: regarding the pill, I wouldn'
t be surprised at all if it's had a profound impact on female behavior.
mircea_popescu: nah. sultans who were porphyrogenited so to speak don'
t. gengis khan, who is basically a sort of dewey cox, does.
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-03-17#1628626 << i don'
t see this at all. if you fuck a woman "normally" and she's not on the pill, you will obtain 8 kids in 10 years. you will also obtain an extremely shriveled woman, because like it or not females are essentially the cotyledon of children. biology is merciless and the ultimate empire, it dun care one whit your girl is smart and pleasant and worships you, it just cares to push o
☝︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: heck, should be parenting 101. "baby, don'
t fall LIKE THAT. fall like this, look" and there she goes, plop on the carpet.
davout: in other TRB news, my node is happily bitcoining, doesn'
t seem too bothered by working with a regular HDD, and that's without asciilifeform's cache patch
☟︎ trinque: regarding the pill, I wouldn'
t be surprised at all if it's had a profound impact on female behavior.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: think for a moment lol. wtf, nuke plant doesn'
t put out 1pw
ben_vulpes: people don'
t immediately make friends with the largest animal in the room?
mircea_popescu: nah. contrary to popular imagination, domestic tigers aren'
t particularly ferocious.
a111: Logged on 2017-03-16 22:55 mircea_popescu: yeah, i have nfi why teh putin isn'
t flooding the usg with red notices for usgtards.
mircea_popescu: ok. THAT's exclusive. not because it's expensive but because you can'
t fucking get it.
pete_dushenski: dunno why anyone would pose with grey goose that wasn'
t 10l either
pete_dushenski: grey goose has normal unflavoured variants. in mega-bottles (>2l) isn'
t the only 'flavour' available afaik
mircea_popescu: they really gotta hfcs all the things, don'
t they. it's not enough the difference between beer and fanta is the label. now gotta fuck up the liquors too don'
t they
mircea_popescu: yeah, i have nfi why teh putin isn'
t flooding the usg with red notices for usgtards.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: lmao, the libertards are nao in "plox don'
t expect evidence for that trump-russia thing" mutual grooming mode.
ben_vulpes: precisely so that losing power doesn'
t mean instadeath
ben_vulpes: don'
t the megaplanes do the trick with the tiny flap that actuates the effecting flap?
davout: i somehow just don'
t see it
davout: ben_vulpes: i think some don'
t davout: first: don'
t die immediately by recovering the aircraft
davout: tl;dr: don'
t fuck with A380s
davout: trinque: basically your point, which seems absolutely valid, is that past a certain depth you simply can'
t do a reorg, right?
mircea_popescu: bitcoin really doesn'
t have that many nodes active, nor has, for a while now.
trinque: can'
t even say they ~ever~ were a part of bitcoin
trinque: whole thing doesn'
t even have to be SSD; I routinely shuffle off chunks of bdb to platters
mircea_popescu: to which the only sane lucentio answer is "fu, i own them, and if you don'
t like it ask me."
mircea_popescu: and this situation you wish to replace with "because we say so, and if you don';
t like it ask another one of us".
trinque: surely that wasn'
t 'every clever kid wants a fish to eat and a cock to sit upon' ?
davout: google translate doesn'
t exactly help: "et le poisson à manger, et assis sur la bite"
mircea_popescu: i'm not even sure what the thought process is here, beyond "i don'
t want to store books because momstate makes libraries and oh, where did anything but cosmo go ?!"
davout: doesn'
t really matter where you get it from, as long as it verifies, you're not asking your connected peers for a wot identity, yet you take their data and verify it independently
mircea_popescu: the defense to something stupid isn'
t picking something else that's stupid to be yelled at top of lungs.
davout: your copy of the blockchain being personal i don'
t see any other problem than peer-service, if, and only if, you've validated it as validly producing the UTXO set you consider valid
mircea_popescu: davout in principle nothing ; in practice if you can'
t justify whence the coins came then what do you have
mircea_popescu: mpoe-pr didn'
t have "dev" talk on her list and who else read that shithole lol.
ben_vulpes: don'
t get me wrong, responding in context is entirely adequate most of the time
Framedragger: ben_vulpes: sorry for being obtuse, but if by 'show signature' you mean print signature in ascii-armored way, why can'
t you `echo 'foo' | gpg --clearsign > a.txt`, then `cat a.txt | gpg --encrypt --recipient recipient-username > b.bin`, then `gpg --decrypt b.bin`? (this assumes gpg is interactive and will ask for password, so best to break it into multiple commands)
ben_vulpes: i didn'
t understand his shovelful, is all
Framedragger: wasn'
t sure what you were trying to do, sorry - you want to first decrypt a message, *then* check signature - but check how beyond 'signature is good'?
mircea_popescu: there's reasons we don'
t like the sign-and-encrypt bs.
a111: Logged on 2017-03-16 18:26 davout: in case where A was ~never~ spent, after a block containing its reintroduction gets reorg'd, it can'
t ~ever~ be spent
davout: i didn'
t see this "has to be spent before reappear"
davout: in case where A was ~never~ spent, after a block containing its reintroduction gets reorg'd, it can'
t ~ever~ be spent
☟︎ davout: wouldn'
t it consider the reintroduction as "already spent" ?
davout: you can'
t have this in bitcoin is all i'm saying
davout: i don'
t particularly care, just wondering about "you can do it with a system otherwise identical to traditional bitcoin"
davout: don'
t see how, as far as i know you can'
t craft a tx without providing the tx of its parents
mircea_popescu: you're a fine gent, standing on a pile of "because so and so, the sky is falling." "well... i don'
t see it fallen" "show me why not!"
mircea_popescu: and then he wants to re-introduce original. but he can'
t. because doublespent.
mircea_popescu: he'd be doing this by himself as block 60 (really, why all the 0s ? you need them for something ?) which doublespends block 50 won'
t be accepted by eg me.
mircea_popescu: so restate. and also spare me specifications that c ain'
t b, obviously it isn'
t, if it were you'd call it b.
mircea_popescu: do you mean, "it removes transaction entirely but it doesn'
t nor could correcty undo the damage to the ball of yarn" ?
mircea_popescu: other than the hope "they won'
t be many" (recall the naive oh, if we need we just add more digits after decimal ? hurr. you fucking don'
t.)
mircea_popescu: which don'
t discuss "worry, for or against". they discuss "worry, lulz" and other things.
mircea_popescu: fucking female state doesn'
t get to set the agenda for the discussion.
mircea_popescu: it dun work. why would i have qntra do it again ? i know it doesn'
t work.
mircea_popescu: this independent mind trick dun work so well in vacuums, most people aren'
t nearly imaginative enough to pull it off.
mircea_popescu: understand how consequences work : you can'
t at the same time "oh, nobody even told be item from my field of interest" and "oh i see from anthill". either you do or you don'
t, and broadly speaking i guess you don'
t.