250500+ entries in 0.164s
mircea_popescu: it is. in order for you
to get
the whole set you must a) break rsa keys as numerous as
the whole set and b) magically intercept all communications, even
those happening outside of any set
that includes you.
mircea_popescu: this is a stronger guarantee
than what rsa offers, incidentally.
mircea_popescu: from
the fact
that A asks B
to p-add P1 and P1 you can not distinguish whether P1 is being multiplied or added.
that you can't distinguish between
these
two means you have 0 bits, not > 0 bits.
mircea_popescu: you present
to yourself
that you do, because you wish
to. but in practice, you do not.
mircea_popescu: this is a very abstruse spoke off an interesting discussion. i dun really want
to follow it. can we get back
to
the point ?
mircea_popescu: don't CALL
THINGS
THINGS. show. don't
tell.
this isn't bad fanfic hour.
mircea_popescu: let's
try once more. so, I want
to multiply 3 by 3. suppose
the encrypted form of 3 is fgh.
mircea_popescu: i have nfi what you're on about. again : i want
to multiply C1 by C2. I fire up
the UCI, i ask C2 processes
to add C1
to
the result of
the previous process adding C1
to
the result of
the...
mircea_popescu: if my job is
to obtain C1 * C2 I will chain it : ask A
to produce P1 + P1 ; ask B
to add P1
to his result. ask C
to add P1
to
that result and so on.
mircea_popescu: i am very much interested in
this method, because i guess it could be extended
to distinguish malicious from stupid slavegirls
mircea_popescu: how do you aim
to extract difference between crackpot and charlatan from examination of physical reality ?
trinque: is
the
timecube guy not lying?
trinque: what does what he believes in "his
true self" matter?
mircea_popescu: there is a difference if and only if
the difference can be shown.
mircea_popescu: the department of "here's words,
they don't mean anything"
a111: Logged on 2016-10-20 16:01 asciilifeform: ^ argentina mandates diebold voting machine and proclaims
that publication of flaws is punishable
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform hey, if
they have a controversy it means
they exist rite ?
mircea_popescu: anyway.
that
the matriarchy always builds some sort of reddit, which is
to say
the female hujra, pointless-blather-house is much of a historical necessity ; much like how
the matriarchy's annoyance at ~what
trump represents~ necessarily expressed itself in
terms of fantastic "rape".
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform sometimes i suspect you might have been
the only one at your kindergarten :)
mircea_popescu: meanwhile patriarchy is an arrangement among
the best in society, who are strong, inconsequential, and careless.
they
tend
to spend a lot of
time doing, which is purpose without speech, and dedicate
themselves
to raping
the women and
tearing down anything
taller
than
themselves.
mircea_popescu: and since we're on it, let's define
terms. matriarchy - an arrangement built among
the worst in society, who are weak, inconsequential, ambitious and envious.
they
tend
to spend a lot of
time gossiping - which is speech without purpose - and dedicate
themselves
to a very pedestrian sort of magico-technology, aiming
to protect,
their worthless flesh as well as
their miserable progeny.
this necessarily decays into a quest for c
mircea_popescu: and since it's been mentioned, let it be said i'm rather suspicious of
this fuhrerprinzip business also. nazis WERE socialists, by
their own lights, and
the fact
that
they desired a matriarchy stylistically irreconcilable with
the matriarchy in power in england does not make
them men, or respectable.
mircea_popescu: (and for bonus lulz - according
to
THEMSELVES,
the pashtun are jews. unlike
the people you and i know as jews, who are idiots,
the good jews from afghanistan heard of
the last prophet and sent envoys
to muhammad.)
mircea_popescu: there is absolutely nothing but
this
to glue
together eg
t aquinas and jonas
the prophet
mircea_popescu: this is how metaphysics, or christianity, etc even became subjects in
the first place
mircea_popescu: well i dunno about
that.
the point being, if
two works purport
to describe items
that can not be distinguished, it
then stands
that
the
two works are about
the same
thing.
mircea_popescu: physically
the same people, ideologically
the same agenda, financially
the exact same "money", wherein lies
the distinguishing ?
mircea_popescu: the whole "this is how
the matriarchy does it,
this is how it should be done - because
the matriarchy in all
times and places is so much frozen shit" is not liable
to change over
time.
mircea_popescu: the difference from
the other one being specifically
that ?
mircea_popescu: what he does is
the very americansky "i buy old books and rewrite
them in my own hand, nobody'd ever know"
mircea_popescu: not in
the slightest. i daresay
there is not one
thing
that originates with
the curtis yarvin fellow.
trinque: where does he define
this Cathedral
thing
trinque: looking back over recent history, maybe a guy asks himself why
the government stopped pushing
the clipper chip.
trinque: Framedragger: I had old school
thinkpads; I was mocking your implication
that it meant anything about whether
the hardware was diddled
thestringpuller: writing a program for it felt a lot liek
telling
the computer
to play a
tape...