24300+ entries in 0.096s
ThickAsThieves: the fact is there is total ability for the bet to resolve incorrectly if no one is always watching the page and no historical data is served by the page
ThickAsThieves: but instead your resolution implies you would have known if it were No
ThickAsThieves: you couldve been able to say Well when we looked it was not true sorry
ThickAsThieves: partly to make sure i wasnt crazy to spend any time on this
ThickAsThieves: just to acknowledge that what it showed for that date was such
ThickAsThieves: i didnt expect you take take the source to change the bet
ThickAsThieves: (digging myself in a hole here if i'm wrong, i know...)
ThickAsThieves: it would also be cool if the headers on the homepage linked to full displays of that category
ThickAsThieves: well i had a number of bets, all of which i was sure i won and i was digging through emails and saw notifications of .00001 deposits on one of my betting addresses
ThickAsThieves: archive.org is not bitcoincharts.org, the court will argue
ThickAsThieves: any moment where it was <50% in Aug is not able to be displayed on that link
ThickAsThieves: i'm not sure the court gives me any avenue for doing so
ThickAsThieves: is the court allowed to make decisions that conflict with reality
ThickAsThieves: i'm merely asking for bitbet to assert its good faith to the court by disclosing how it knew gox was never <50% before sept
ThickAsThieves: so it's some kind of court where everyone has to use facts but you?
ThickAsThieves: so you concur the court case justification is not applicable here?
ThickAsThieves: it'll take you more time dealing with me than just showing me
ThickAsThieves: so bitbet has no responsibility for it's resolutions to reflect reality?
ThickAsThieves: reality is reality, whether bettors point it out or not