194800+ entries in 1.447s

decimation: the annoying thing to me (growing up on
a -48) was that the 16 only displayed one stack element at
a time
undata predicts there will just be drivers that establish one part of ram as
a ramdisk
PeterL: "In particular, the company needs to perfect
a new form of computer memory based on an electronic component called
a memristor" << so, they just need to figure out how to make the core feature work, then they are all set!
BingoBoingo would like to rip all of the memory out of "The Machine" and air drop it to asciilifeform in 2010 with
a duffelbag full of money
decimation:
a high-end fgpa would be perfectly capable of passing full pipe of signed packets
decimation: what if mr. spam learns the ip of
a friend?
decimation: asciilifeform: agreed, but it might be impractical. consider
a 'firewall' that is checking mr spam's packets all day
PeterL: (or just send
a signed rating message once that gets implemented)
PeterL: auth to assbot in
a pm, that gives you voice?
decimation: ah, but then assbot would need
a 'hot key'
nanotube: use pastebin to pass
a signed message to the bot. assbot can just grab the user database on
a regular basis to keep current.
decimation: but at least it would be
a step in the right direction
decimation: why not have assbot (or
a slave bot) simply pm everyone
a copy of signed messages?
PeterL: nanotube: I don't think the change I am suggesting would require any change of gribble, just adding
a separate auth to assbot
PeterL: would we need to pm assbot to get
a challenge to decrypt, or could it be something like we just send assbot the signature of "auth <wot name> <current time>"?
nanotube: asciilifeform: hrm... that's
a tough problem. how?
nanotube: PeterL: oh well, i guess auth can stay for that purpose. or you can just send
a signed message to assbot directly, in theory.
PeterL: that helps with ratings, but does not help the current voicing model of #b-
a nanotube: asciilifeform: i'm hoping for
a gradual transition, as people upgrade their ratings with signed packets. after
a sunset period, all unsigned ratings may be ignored
nanotube: PeterL: you'll say "rate dude 1 signature". why even
a separate 'auth' step?
nanotube: asciilifeform: well, more like an anti "guy leaves, some other guy comes in on same ip, and gribble has no way of knowing about it, unless they share
a channel and gribble can see quits"
nanotube: it is being worked on. but have
a lot of other stuff on my plate. once everything is signed, there will not even be
a need for something like "auth".
PeterL: so the question for you: would it be possible to let people auth without being in
a chan with gribble?
undata: no idea why, but it left me without my cloak for
a bit, as freenode wouldn't let me change nicks
nanotube: well, that's
a reason for people here to be cloaked. i remember hearing about that
decimation: nanotube: there's
a ddoser who spams anyone who joins #bitcoin-assets with
a 'naked' ip with an ntp amplification attack
nanotube: asciilifeform: it's
a way to track
a person by hostmask, to provide persistent auth sessions. once we move to 'everything must be signed' there would be no need for auth sessions, and thus no need for people to be in particular channels shared with gribble.
kakobrekla: i go through it
a few times
a year but for that reason particularly
BingoBoingo: #b-
a irc net seems the only long term solution
PeterL: decimation: there are
a bunch of -1s which offset +1s
PeterL: have
a #bitcoin-assets WoT separate from #bitcoin-otc?
PeterL: it's strange, you must be in chan, but you can auth in
a pm, so why be in the chan?
mike_c: kako is too easily swayed by
a cookie or two.
PeterL: but really, you can learn alot more going over
a few months of logs than trying to get lucky by finding something interesting happening right now at this moment
mike_c: by hitting f5 on log.b-
a?
Luke-Jr: asciilifeform: you are
a hypocrite, nothing more
mike_c: ok, I am
a reporter for NYT, I have to do same dance?
BingoBoingo: ^ Ah, case for keeping
a vegetable garden element
undata_: heh I am totally making
a bitcoin overlay as
a weekend project btw
kakobrekla: afaik it is suppose to be
a securitah feature and i dunno where nano stands on that.
BingoBoingo: Seems hsitorically this was
a "Sundown Town"
BingoBoingo remembers for the longest time in childhood the hometown having
a metal wagon wheel fascimile supported on
a post in the town square
BingoBoingo: I think having had
a GPG key fingerprint on an MPEx listed contract is the rough equivalent of
a commision so asciilifeform at the worst you are probaby
a captain by now.
undata_: hosted in
a five-eyes country might be another :p
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Well, there are ideas. If
a new network popped up parachute would be likely. Seems though that the root of current problem is freenode baring IPs and lacking any controling entity that could be convinced to do otherwise.
kakobrekla: well you manually invite
a 'new guy' take the chance it doesnt work out, you need some means to get rid of it?
kakobrekla: which was also responsible for
a bunch of cloak fails
decimation: it's not really
a ban, it's more of
a bouncer
decimation: asciilifeform: but this only works if one regards
a n00b with utter contempt