193100+ entries in 1.489s

artifexd: And now we have
a blockchain growth problem.
artifexd: If you do the gossip thing then each server needs to maintain
a history (of possibly infinite length)
artifexd: Now you're talking about
a lot of back and forth instead of the bundle approach.
artifexd: Anybody have
a good name for this project? ircd isn't going to cut it.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Right. Prolly won't be long before ISIS seizes
a medical xray and does some experimenting to catch up tp 5Is on this front
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu: Well i imagine sufficiently resourceful turrorist would make
a normal looking to X-Ray evil battery pack
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo soon enough there's going to be
a "no half empty batteries" rule then.
BingoBoingo: hanbot: Well, the first bullet on the subject missed and you politely loaded the chamber with
a second so why not?
mircea_popescu: suppose i make 50k 1btc txn. they don't fit in
a 1mn block. they do fit in
a 10mb block. what now ?
hanbot: BingoBoingo oh, i just thought i'd give the paragraph mp described
a shot
ben_vulpes: i still fail to see how you're going to make
a txn that gets included in the large block chain and not the small block chain.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes if one block's large and the other small, all i need
a tx that's included in the large block but not the small one. then doublespend it on the small one, which will be rejected necessarily by the large block blockchain
assbot: Which bank will have the foresight to give /krakenfx
a USD bank account? /Chase /WellsFargo /BofA_News /usbank /Citibank /HSBC_US /hashtag/bitcoin?src=hash
BingoBoingo: First step is to double spend such that confirmed coins from address
A end up confirmed to
a safe depth at different addresses B and C on the different forked chains.
ben_vulpes: mircea_popescu: how do you plan to cook up
a transaction dumping your coins that's valid on the gavinchain but not the mirceachain?
mircea_popescu: but there can be
a later protocol extension covering udp
mircea_popescu: if done right,
a reasonable expectation will be that any box is running it anyway.
mircea_popescu: it is in my eyes much more valuable to have
a working prototype rapidly, that then can be extended (and nothing will prevent
a future client to filter traffic any way itchooses, say by accepting udp only)
artifexd: 576 bytes ain't
a lot of space.
mircea_popescu: for that matter, we have
a much shittier version currently,
mircea_popescu: on
a more practical angle, you will note that the various entities relying on "secrecy" are in jail, from the pirate robets to the shrem dude. even "thanking the judge for
a justice well done".
mircea_popescu: no, i shan't live by any entities' permission. the state will live by my permission, or go down in
a hail of bullets and flame thrower exhaust.
mircea_popescu: artifexd more's the point, i don't specifically give
a shit about "analysis"
artifexd: Right. But "once
a second" is in the first draft of the rfc.
artifexd: syn floods are
a solved problem
artifexd: TCP does offer advantages. Not having to reinvent/reimplement transmission reliability/ordering is not
a minor thing.
artifexd: Is "can be transmitted via carrier pigeon" really
a priority for this project?
kakobrekla: >As you well observe, this thing is in fact Bitcoin without the shared public ledger (kept instead as
a virtual private ledger by each node).
mircea_popescu: i thought about it for
a while, but fundamentally, wot has
a lot of trouble existing independent of the forum.
mircea_popescu: artifexd it's supposed to replace ircd as
a secure, fast and reliable means to communicate directly with others.
artifexd: mircea_popescu: Do you envision the ircd project have the end goal of replacing the freenode #b-
a channel or is it only supposed to be
a way for one individual to communicate with another individual?
BingoBoingo: hanbot: Is that
a comment or
a article submission?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform how would someone know if sometyhing's
a mistranslation absernt source matrerial ?
BingoBoingo: muh_buttcoins: It depends. What % of your net wealth do you presently depend on for provisioning
a roof and some food?
muh_buttcoins: what % of your net wealth do you think is
a good amount to invest in bitcoin
mircea_popescu: and the us muppets are currently shivering to death in
a "democratic" ukraine that CLEARLY had to have its block sizes increased.
mircea_popescu: the us has
a lengthy history of getting involved in wars it can't afford
mircea_popescu: Apocalyptic kako's argument needs
a "and the govt will print money and give it to them. forever" companion.
mircea_popescu: jurov this discussion entirely elides the more important point of "why in the fuck would miners even consider
a proposal that inflates their main ware".