15200+ entries in 0.009s
ossabot: Logged on 2019-10-04 11:59:44 diana_coman: all 3 loggers seem synced atm; ossabot is back
too,
though still waiting
to find out wtf happened exactly.
ossabot: Logged on 2019-10-03 22:28:19 asciilifeform: i find it mighty 'coincidence'(tm)
that for year+ we get 24/7 pipe, and
then put a logger and nao dulap-I
treatment.
diana_coman: it did reconnect properly
the
times when it just lost connection; hm,
the log I saw for when unreachable, it was
trying
to connect
diana_coman: asciilifeform:
thanks, I'll have a look; fwiw so far bvt's fix actually worked well for ossabot
mp_en_viaje: amusingly, muh
thing here unmolested apparently, i got complete scrollback even
BingoBoingo: mp_en_viaje: Got flooded, appears
to have been one of
the lurkers havesting uncloaked ips and shooting
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform:
This
terminal is on a radiomodem atm
BingoBoingo: I have stopped irissi, weechat, and znc services on
the shared machine. I am about
to request
the portion of
the IP space not known
to be running uncloaked bouncers is restored shortly.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform:
ty in
the basement on junkyard wars connection
ericbot: Logged on 2019-10-04 17:32:32 diana_coman: asciilifeform: uhm, how does
that reasoning go?
they fire less at my box because one box or what? anyways, is
there at least any concrete communication from piz's data centre re what
they are doing otherwise exactly?
diana_coman: not
that "oh, so currently not under fire because
they are firing at piz"
diana_coman: asciilifeform: ok, but
the point here is
that moldavians managed
to mitigate it while under fire.
diana_coman: asciilifeform: uhm, how does
that reasoning go?
they fire less at my box because one box or what? anyways, is
there at least any concrete communication from piz's data centre re what
they are doing otherwise exactly?
diana_coman: dunno, moldavians managed
to mitigate it sanely without unplugging my logger
diana_coman had
to follow quite a few
things at
the same
time during
this last hr so didn't focus on pizarro specifically.
diana_coman: o.O
they mitigated by unplugging
the paying customer, I see.
diana_coman: asciilifeform: yes re piz house; I was just noting
that
those have nothing
to do with cloaks and irc at any rate.
BingoBoingo: It seems
to depend on how big
the incoming crapflood is and how far upstream
they have
to go
to find a sufficiently wide pipe
to cut off
the crapflood.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: We have an asymmetrical pipe.
The 200Mb/s is
traffic going out of
the rack
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: We have
to start from somewhere
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: I
trying
to start by getting
the portions of
the range without known, uncloaked IRC bouncers opened up again. From
there we continue
trying
to open
things up.
ossabot: (pizarro) 2019-10-04
thimbronion: fwiw my bouncer (running on non-pizarro box) was disconnected yesterday, and a few days prior, and although I have a cloak, it does not get applied before bouncer rejoins channels.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: It does appear
the SSLism for cloaks is still optional, but a delay needs
to be inserted between authentication and joining channels
BingoBoingo: Well, now with cloaks attacker HAS
to reveal
that
they are
targeting
diana_coman: ok but
the problem is still
there, only ...better hidden, no/
BingoBoingo: I am saying have cloak, ever so slightly more protected in
theory yet substantially more protected in practice
diana_coman: BingoBoingo: are you saying
that "have a cloak -> no problem" or what exactly?
BingoBoingo: I suspect what happened is a long stretch of relatively calm weather got a lot of people complacent on
the matter of IRC cloaks.
BingoBoingo: The cloak is not perfect protection, but it does frustrate
the lazy sort of attack we appear
to have been struck by
BingoBoingo: The omissions strongly suggest uncloaked IRC connections drew
the aggro
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: "The attacks are moving on
the range. It started with .97,
then move
to .99,
then
to .200 and so on."
This supports lazy attack
targeting uncloaked irc connections.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: I am presently connected
through not a bouncer
diana_coman: moldavians seem
to be doing fine so far ie attack still on from what
they say but not making it
through.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: I don't see a simpler narrative for why diana_coman's bot went down
too.
BingoBoingo: <diana_coman>
that's why I didn't really bother re cloak because
the ip is public anyway << Even
the most
trivial barrier does something, like prevent lurkbots from harvesting addresses as
they connect.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Someone appears
to be hopping around and hitting addresses. DDoS is an unsolved problem.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Apparently
the full block down due
to flooding