144000+ entries in 1.172s

mircea_popescu: Bitcoind as written would be the best possible example of condescending software design if it were worthy of being called "designed" instead of "crufted together by a monotonically increasingly febrile group of contributors". <<
i can sign that.
SuchWow: Anyhow, it's been a pleasure speaking with you all, and should
I ever quit my job and start daytrading BTC/USD fulltime again,
I will return.
I will give back the last 2 minutes
I have of being 'upped' to the floor. :)
ben_vulpes: ah CAddrDB("cr+").LoadAddresses();
i missed you
SuchWow:
i ofc assume that sentimentality on btc prices affects the securities tradded with it lol
mircea_popescu: then go through these phases of he's kidding no wait, wait,
i recall this. but it couldn't be. o yes it is.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes
i just keep forgetting the horrest parts of bitcoin
SuchWow: hence why
i was curious as to the general sentiment here
SuchWow:
i'm currently bullish, after a LONG time of being bearish
SuchWow: (
i just trade btc/usd on 796 at 50:1 for gambling purposes)
SuchWow: and if nobody here knows that answer, than that tells me what
i need to know lol
SuchWow:
i think nobody knows the answer to my question lol
SuchWow: srsly tho, only thing
i can find
SuchWow: that's what
i can't figure out
SuchWow: anyhow
i'll poof after the up goes down
mircea_popescu: nbews in past 6 months : s.mpoe almost went to shit but recovered,
i lost the berkshire bet, s.mg launched eulora, s.nsa's phuctor delivered 60 or so broken rsa moduli
SuchWow: and
i say that from an outside perspective
SuchWow:
i really never was a super active participant
ben_vulpes: and
i guess is deedbot new since you last were here?
SuchWow: and yes,
i get this chan is professional, and above my head, that's why
i left lol
SuchWow: ben_vulpes:
i feel ya, grumpy seems about right
SuchWow: upon joining,
i asked what the current sentiment of btc was here
SuchWow:
i remembered being active here long ago
SuchWow: anyhow
i will restate why
i joined this chan again
cazalla:
i can hold my breath under water for 30 seconds..
SuchWow: yet
i trade successfully for 2 years
assbot: Logged on 23-08-2014 07:41:30; SuchWow:
i've NEVER ONCE talked here lol\
SuchWow: [20:11:46] <+SuchWow> and
i've never been interested
SuchWow:
i've answered all of your questions
SuchWow:
i'm not bragging?
i was answering a question asked of me
SuchWow: 6 months ago when
i was last here
williamdunne: SuchWow: You mentioned the dogecoin thing,
I also assumed you're still involved
SuchWow: cazalla:
i was asked 'who are you again'
SuchWow: but
i'm not involved with dogecoin
SuchWow: cazalla: there you go again. Why do you think
i am involved with dogecoin?
ben_vulpes: <mircea_popescu> "
i thought
i killed it a year ago!"
SuchWow: and
i l ike to trade 796 at 50:1 instead of playing poker these days
cazalla: SuchWow, you're the one that said check out the charts..
i did and btc38 is supposedly 85% of the dogecoin trade
SuchWow:
i just saw one of your 'members' spamming in another chan
SuchWow: what he actually said cold be true,,
i woudln't know lol
SuchWow: implying that
i have knowledge of what he was saying
SuchWow: someone asked who
i was,
i reminded them, and then you started in with ur bullshit
SuchWow: cazalla:
i've been upped over a dozen times here, thanks
SuchWow:
i dunno, you're here in this chan,
i haven't been here for months
SuchWow: cazalla: if you say so,
i really and honestly wouldn't know anything about that
SuchWow: now
i get why you only voice ppl under certain conditions
cazalla: SuchWow, you mean
i don't know chinese exchanges pump it up with fake volume to fool westerners?
SuchWow: cazalla: clearly you haven't been watching dogecoin charts, and even more clearly, you have no idea who
i am.
SuchWow: u can search ur logs for more,
i've had a few mildly amusing exchanges here (not really tho
SuchWow: and
i've never been interested
SuchWow:
I was a founding op of #dogecoin lol
SuchWow:
i've been gone for 2-3 months, tl;dr me the best parts
funkenstein_: which unfortunately uses java 8, and when
I was trying to test
I didn't even get as far as building OpenJDK 8
funkenstein_:
i'm doubt it's what you are referring to, but the "atomic transaction.. btc from x to y and Ztc from y to x all in one all-or-nothing TX, has supposedly been implemented by mercury exchange
assbot: Logged on 21-06-2015 17:56:12; punkman: asciilifeform:
I think the state of the art is: you send X BTC to 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE then new genesis block assigns X newcoin to originating address, or something along these lines
assbot: IamA 23 year old from the UK who can end the austerity and inequality that we are facing, but
I am ignored by the media and even my own political party AMA! : IAmA ... (
http://bit.ly/1JcT6Ae )
mod6: ok,
i've got a patch
i created myself (post application of patches: gentoo/uclibc/PIE) for gcc... just trying to get it to work with emerge.
jurov: that's incredible picture... why it does not go on at least to 2100,
i wonder
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller
i wonder briefly why these tards don't do something useful with their time, instead of making pointless "infographs" that make no sense, represent no data and interest no one.
ben_vulpes: although
i did get a claim yesterday...
ben_vulpes:
i don't even have any items in eulora yet
mod6: lol, this is uglier than
I had thought.
I patched the gcc-4.8.4 source with all of the patches from /their/ bundle v1.5 (
http://dpaste.com/1NRJTT7.txt), and now
i'm in there apply patches by hand, and only 2 out of ~10 files to patch actually exist here (the rest are for pr# files (Problem Report?)). And when
I can apply a patch, the surrounding code is slightly different.
cazalla: ;;later tell peter_dushenski
i think your blog might've eaten my comment
mod6:
I think
I might try to manually implement the changes required if the files in question do exist.
mod6: so trinque &
I have discovered that the patch provided by the email mentioned (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00410.html ) doesn't patch cleanly at all. Even with some McGuyvering of the patch to ensure the paths are correct etc, there are still a number of files not found. It might be plausible to write our own custom patch for 4.8.4 to resolve the issue.
punkman: asciilifeform:
I think the state of the art is: you send X BTC to 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE then new genesis block assigns X newcoin to originating address, or something along these lines
☟︎ mod6: anyway, yeah,
i think this crud goes all the way back to the start.
mod6: anyway,
i did checkout git tag v0.1.5 and the code there has the external ip stuff too.
mod6: oooh.
i was super confused. ok the name of the file is "bitcoin-src-21may2012.tar.gz"
williamdunne: asciilifeform: Remind me tomorrow, and yeah
I need to revive scoop anyway
williamdunne: mircea_popescu:
I know your policy on MPEX is only to support bitcoin denominated businesses, but whats your opinion on exchanges? IMO while fiat is involved, revenue is almost entirely pegged to bitcoin
williamdunne: Naphex: Definitely,
I'm guessing its the scammer you worked for trying to revive his shit without your source
williamdunne: Which if
I'm reading correctly, doesn't apply to EU citizens for Romanian companies
williamdunne: Naphex:
I was terrified this was the finished product
mod6: Unrelated,
I downgraded my GPG version from v1.4.13 to v1.4.10 -- incase anyone notices the change in my sigs.
mod6: So yeah, in the version (v0.2.1) from MPs email, that code to find the external ip is included. Also if
I do a checkout of tag v0.1.5 from git, same thing. Still don't know who added it for sure though.