131200+ entries in 3.17s
smickles: i clearly don'
t understand the world all that well
smickles: better: why would someone think it's worth .0045, 'cause i currently don'
t BTC-Mining: Well I wouldn'
t see a problem to that =/
BTC-Mining: Since you two don'
t like each other, I think you wouldn'
t mind either cases.
BTCHero: and we will all be like, hey dude that wasn'
t cool
BTC-Mining: The community would get really pissed if he doesn'
t pay up and he's bluffing.
BTC-Mining: Well if pirate doesn'
t pay... He'd better pay up
agath: how? anyway I don'
t know your architecture enough.. so I can'
t say...
nefario: I don'
t see how transactions handle concurrent access to a resource that shouldn'
t be ..concurrently accessed
agath: but I don'
t know anything more than what I can see from the web service so I think I can'
t give you any hint, I guess you know better.. :-)
nefario: he's been having a go at me since I didn'
t agree with him
nefario: which isn'
t happening without locking sorted
BTC-Mining: shouldn'
t the new reserve less balance be implemented now?
BTCHero: i don'
t know, I will try it again
BTC-Mining: I wouldn'
t mind helping along others do that
BTCHero: I reset my password and i still can'
t get in
BTC-Mining: Wouldn'
t using a full backup and letting a few dozen of us go crazy on it help tho seeing how it would behave live?
nefario: In testing I didn'
t have any issues with deadlock
nefario: BTC-Mining: you don'
t see a lot of problems until you launch the system live
nefario: BTC-Mining: I did, you don'
t think that I tested the new version?
BTC-Mining: Can'
t you have a testing platform like testing.glbse.com with all features working? Placed on another server with a backup of the current GLBSE, where me and others here could go and go crazy on doing transactions and whatnot to test new features?
smickles: bah, i can'
t continue to recite the new twitter rules, my wife wants to drink and watch america's next top model
kakobrekla: 02:10.26 ( BTC-Mining ) I don'
t see the bot relaying the trade
BTC-Mining: I don'
t see the bot relaying the trade
BTC-Mining: Can'
t you create a copy of GLBSE on a small VPS or something for which to test rolling updates and doing those kind of testing prior to rolling it out?
BTC-Mining: I can make assbot repeat the transactions, they just don'
t occur...
smickles: and if the share isn'
t removed from availability to sell on the exchange, the proof of ownership at time X is meaningless, 'cause i could sell it at time X + .01
smickles: yeah, but what's the use of that? you wouldn'
t be able to sell it to someone 'off exchange', right?
mircea_popescu: you don'
t sign your share tho, you jsut get a signed cert that you own so and so shares
BTC-Mining: I can'
t check the security internally...
smickles: it seems a seat on the NYSE, allows you to trade, and doesn'
t get you an account history
mircea_popescu: ya i guess it depends what they're used to, but prolly most wouldn'
t.
BTC-Mining: It doesn'
t change the percent returned, but should allow to reinvest in full (or almost) each week if wanted.
BTCHero: I saw a bunch at .1 then went to buy and they weren'
t there
DeaDTerra: they didn'
t have the Bitcoins accessable so they were automatically cancelled :P
MoneyIsDebt: kakobrekla: Until they get that health bar over ppl in real life, they won'
t know when to stop shooting
evoorhees: the print ad campaign will be longer term - it'll introduce the normal gambling world to bitcoin. This will have a long-term effect on SD's long term outlook, but I don'
t think it would cause any sudden surge
mircea_popescu: i haven'
t done any print advertising in > 5 years now.
evoorhees: True but this week can reasonably be considered an outlier - I don'
t want people to think that this week is far out of the norm, however. It is fairly in line with the past 30 days of performance
evoorhees: just to clarify, the 4.72x P/E for the past 30 days wouldn'
t be far different if we excluded this past week of performance. So if you want to remove the publicity factor from this week, the P/E for the past 30 days is probably in the 5-6x range
usagi: You can'
t enter market orders on GLBSE tho.
Jackmaninov: usagi: i agree limit orders are the rational thing to do, but panics aren'
t rational :)
teek: they won'
t realy dissapeer because as soon as the account can'
t honor the bid it is removed
mircea_popescu: i don'
t see what needs to be argued really. pretty clear as it is.
mircea_popescu: this "plans change" doesn'
t fly. the only way it can change is if he says he starts monday and finishes friday
rg: he didn'
t ask you to create passthrough bonds and sell them
gigavps: they didn'
t tell you that!
BTCHero: I would really like to setup a fund to buy houses with, but the currency risk of btc is too high. if it went up i wouldn'
t be able to payback
rg: why didn'
t my irc client show that
BTCHero: nefario: i don'
t understand that request. I have .18xxx in my balance and ~.15 buy orders out. When i put in a order for .1 it just says it is queued instead of saying i can
t do it
rg: i emailed him and he didn'
t reply
nefario: BTCHero: no, should tell you if you don'
t have enough
BTCHero: so if you don'
t have enough btc for an order it just says your order has been queued then it dissapears?
mircea_popescu: i bet you vast majority of chinese ppl don'
t eat that.
nefario: tonikt: why don'
t you use the web interface?
nefario: so it doesn'
t tie up the web server
nefario: tonikt: orders are cancelled when you don'
t have enough BTC to cover them
usagi: can'
t log in and had to reset my pw
Lucidize: You are spouting rubbish. I don'
t want any 7%, it was actually you who told me to hang on and wait for the divs, they haven'
t appeared so next question was when you will be buying back. Telling me to wait like everyone else when you have already made promises on it hasn'
t helped your integrity
usagi: Why the heck would I liquidate 2000 btc worth of mining bonds because you can'
t wait for pirate? That's not really my problem.
usagi: He's shutting down his bank. I didn'
t get any dividend payments. And I don'
t have the money. But as I am told, by pirate, payments are coming out soon, within a week
usagi: That isn'
t how it works.
usagi: Pirate didn'
t default because you aren'
t getting 7% a week
usagi: Step one, you have to realize pirate hasn'
t defaulted yet.
usagi: I mean I don'
t mind answering questions but if you're going to call me an ass and say I am being unprofessional when it's obvious you haven'
t even done basic research
mircea_popescu: if you don'
t tell them what to expect they pick something random, expect that, and then it just gets everyone frustrated.
usagi: and then there won'
t be any money left
Lucidize: I don'
t know why you're being so rude to be fai, I guess you just don'
t have the answers
Lucidize: I have been quite patient and discussed it in pm previously, I don'
t intend to be rude
Lucidize: Many days later, neither have happened. I just didn'
t realise it all depended on if and when pirate was going to pay out
Lucidize: I thought CPA had a backer, didn'
t realise it was pirate investments
Lucidize: ok I didn'
t know that luceo, switching to comp brb
Luceo: But if you don'
t think he will pay you back, I'm more than willing to take that risk for you
Lucidize: I don'
t understand the connection if cpa and pirate, why there are no funds to continue with buy back
Lucidize: feels like I'm just told to f.o. every time I ask about the buy back, don'
t know why its so difficult and I'm losing my patience with yarr now
usagi: I didn'
t move the market up.
usagi: Duhh, when I bought in, I didn'
t buy in at a high price either :p
usagi: Even if I had 3x trhe money... selling it all at once wouldn'
t yield enough to cover the 1x in pirate
usagi: If I don'
t sell it for what it's worth there won'
t be enough to cover the pirate.
usagi: If I do it slowly then theoretically as I sell off the assets, people will reinvest at least part of it and the market won'
t crash